Immunological and genetic kinetics from diagnosis to clinical progression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Progressió clínica; Evasió immuneProgresión clínica; Evasión inmuneClinical progression; Immune evasionBackground Mechanisms driving the progression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) from its early stages are not fully understood. The acquisition of molecular changes at the time of progression has been observed in a small fraction of patients, suggesting that CLL progression is not mainly driven by dynamic clonal evolution. In order to shed light on mechanisms that lead to CLL progression, we investigated longitudinal changes in both the genetic and immunological scenarios. Methods We performed genetic and immunological longitudinal analysis using paired primary samples from untreated CLL patients that underwent clinical progression (sampling at diagnosis and progression) and from patients with stable disease (sampling at diagnosis and at long-term asymptomatic follow-up). Results Molecular analysis showed limited and non-recurrent molecular changes at progression, indicating that clonal evolution is not the main driver of clinical progression. Our analysis of the immune kinetics found an increasingly dysfunctional CD8+ T cell compartment in progressing patients that was not observed in those patients that remained asymptomatic. Specifically, terminally exhausted effector CD8+ T cells (T-betdim/−EomeshiPD1hi) accumulated, while the the co-expression of inhibitory receptors (PD1, CD244 and CD160) increased, along with an altered gene expression profile in T cells only in those patients that progressed. In addition, malignant cells from patients at clinical progression showed enhanced capacity to induce exhaustion-related markers in CD8+ T cells ex vivo mainly through a mechanism dependent on soluble factors including IL-10. Conclusions Altogether, we demonstrate that the interaction with the immune microenvironment plays a key role in clinical progression in CLL, thereby providing a rationale for the use of early immunotherapeutic intervention.This work was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (PI17/00950, M.C., PI18/01392, P.A. and PI17/00943, F.B.) and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Fundación Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (M.C. and P.A.), Gilead Fellowships (GLD16/00144, GLD18/00047, F.B.) and Fundació la Marató de TV3 (201905–30-31 F.B). S.B. is the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from Fundación Alfonso Martin Escudero. R.V-M. is supported by a Torres Quevedo fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PTQ-16-08623). A.E-C. is funded by ISCIII/MINECO (PT17/0009/0019) which is co-funded by FEDER. M.C. holds a contract from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (RYC-2012-2018)

Cell free circulating tumor DNA in cerebrospinal fluid detects and monitors central nervous system involvement of B-cell lymphomas

Limfoma no Hodgkin agressiu; Limfoma del SNCLinfoma no Hodgkin agresivo; Linfoma del SNCAggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma; CNS lymphomaThe levels of cell free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma correlated with treatment response and outcome in systemic lymphomas. Notably, in brain tumors, the levels of ctDNA in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are higher than in plasma. Nevertheless, their role in central nervous system (CNS) lymphomas remains elusive. We evaluated the CSF and plasma from 19 patients: 6 restricted CNS lymphomas, 1 systemic and CNS lymphoma, and 12 systemic lymphomas. We performed whole exome sequencing or targeted sequencing to identify somatic mutations of the primary tumor, then variant-specific droplet digital PCR was designed for each mutation. At time of enrolment, we found ctDNA in the CSF of all patients with restricted CNS lymphoma but not in patients with systemic lymphoma without CNS involvement. Conversely, plasma ctDNA was detected in only 2/6 patients with restricted CNS lymphoma with lower variant allele frequencies than CSF ctDNA. Moreover, we detected CSF ctDNA in 1 patient with CNS lymphoma in complete remission and in 1 patient with systemic lymphoma, 3 and 8 months before CNS relapse was confirmed; indicating CSF ctDNA might detect CNS relapse earlier than conventional methods. Finally, in 2 cases with CNS lymphoma, CSF ctDNA was still detected after treatment even though a complete decrease in CSF tumor cells was observed by flow cytometry (FC), indicating CSF ctDNA better detected residual disease than FC. In conclusion, CSF ctDNA can better detect CNS lesions than plasma ctDNA and FC. In addition, CSF ctDNA predicted CNS relapse in CNS and systemic lymphomas.This work was supported by research funding from Fundación Asociación Española contra el Cáncer (AECC) (to JS, MC and PA); FERO (to JS), laCaixa (to JS), BBVA (CAIMI) (to JS), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (PI16/01278 to JS; PI17/00950 to MC; PI17/00943 to FB) cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Gilead Fellowships (GLD16/00144, GLD18/00047, to FB). MC holds a contract from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (RYC-2012-12018). SB received funding from Fundación Alfonso Martin Escudero. LE received funding from the Juan de la Cierva fellowship. We thank CERCA Programme / Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support

Repolarization of tumor infiltrating macrophages and increased survival in mouse primary CNS lymphomas after XPO1 and BTK inhibition

XPO1; BTK; Sistema immunitari innatXPO1; BTK; Sistema inmune innatoXPO1; BTK; Innate immune systemBackground Patients diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) often face dismal outcomes due to the limited availability of therapeutic options. PCNSL cells frequently have deregulated B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling, but clinical responses to its inhibition using ibrutinib have been brief. In this regard, blocking nuclear export by using selinexor, which covalently binds to XPO1, can also inhibit BCR signaling. Selinexor crosses the blood–brain barrier and was recently shown to have clinical activity in a patient with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the CNS. We studied selinexor alone or in combination with ibrutinib in pre-clinical mouse models of PCNSL. Methods Orthotopic xenograft models were established by injecting lymphoma cells into the brain parenchyma of athymic mice. Tumor growth was monitored by bioluminescence. Malignant cells and macrophages were studied by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. Results Selinexor blocked tumor growth and prolonged survival in a bioluminescent mouse model, while its combination with ibrutinib further increased survival. CNS lymphoma in mice was infiltrated by tumor-promoting M2-like macrophages expressing PD-1 and SIRPα. Interestingly, treatment with selinexor and ibrutinib favored an anti-tumoral immune response by shifting polarization toward inflammatory M1-like and diminishing PD-1 and SIRPα expression in the remaining tumor-promoting M2-like macrophages. Conclusions These data highlight the pathogenic role of the innate immune microenvironment in PCNSL and provide pre-clinical evidence for the development of selinexor and ibrutinib as a new promising therapeutic option with cytotoxic and immunomodulatory potential.This work was supported by research funding from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (PI17/00950, M.C., PI17/00943, F.B, PI18/01392, P.A., PI16/01278, J.S) cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); Fundación Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (M.C. and P.A.) and Gilead Fellowships (GLD16/00144, GLD18/00047, F.B). M.C. holds a contract from Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (RYC-2012-12018). S.B. is the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from Fundación Alfonso Martin Escudero