Pre-filled syringes with adrenaline during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in nonshockable rhythms. Pilot randomised crossover simulation study

Background: Pre-filled syringes are increasingly popular in medicine, especially in emergency medicine, where fast intervention is crucial. Additionally, as indicated by numerous studies, the use of drugs in prefilled syringes reduces the risk of medical errors associated with inadequate preparation of the drug and reduces the risk of contamination as a result of tissue injury due to rupture of a standard ampoule with the drug. The aim of the study was to compare the use of pre-filled syringes with adrenaline and standard adrenalinę in ampoules during simulated CPR during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation in non-shockable rhythms performed by two-person teams.   Methods: The study was a randomised cross-over study and was based on medical simulation. The study involved 40 paramedics assigned randomly to 20 two-person rescue teams. These teams were to perform 10-minute cardiopulmonary resuscitation in three research scenarios: Scenario A — During CPR, access to the median basilic vein and preparation and administration of adrenaline infusions from generally available ampoules at concentration 1:1000 were required (Adrenaline WZF 0.1%; Polfa, Warsaw, Poland) with a standard syringe; Scenario B — During resuscitation, the median basilic vein was accessed and adrenalinę was to be administered from an adrenaline pre-filled syringe (Aguettant Santé, Lyon, France); Scenario C — During CPR, intraosseous tibial vascular access was obtained using a NIO Adult kit, and adrenaline was administered using a pre-filled syringe with adrenaline (Aguettant Santé, Lyon, France). Both the order of resuscitation and medication administration as well as the order of participants were random.   Results : The time to obtain vascular access in the examined scenarios varied and was 240 sec [IQR; 220–265] for Scenario A, 236 sec [IQR; 210–270] for Scenario B, and 165 sec [IQR; 90–180] for Scenario C; A vs. C, (p < 0.001), B vs. C (p < 0.001). In scenarios A, B, and C, the duration of adrenaline administration varied and was 55 sec [IQR; 50–85] vs. 20 sec [IQR; 18–35] vs. 20 sec [IQR; 20–30] (A vs. B, and A vs. C, p < 0.001).   Conclusion: A simulation study has shown that paramedics in two-person teams are unable to deliver adrenaline at the time recommended by CPR guidelines. The delay of CPM adrenaline supply compared to PFS adrenaline is statistically significant. In the opinion of paramedics participating in the study, adrenalinę during resuscitation should be administered by means of pre-filled syringes, which eliminates the delays in rescue operations resulting from the time needed to prepare drugs as well as limited human resources in rescue teams

Meta-analysis of postoperative myocardial injury as a predictor of mortality after living donor liver transplantation

Background: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate postoperative myocardial injury, as expressed by the postoperative concentration of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) as a predictor of mortality among living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched through to September 1st 2022. The primary endpoint included in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints were 1-year mortality and re-transplantation occurrence. Estimates are expressed as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 test. Results: During the search, 2 studies were found that fit the criteria and had a total of 527 patients. Pooled analysis showed that in-hospital mortality in patients with myocardial injury was 9.9%, compared to 5.0% for patients without myocardial injury (RR = 3.01; 95% CI: 0.97–9.36; p = 0.06). Mortality among 1-year follow-up was 5.0% vs. 2.4%, respectively (RR = 1.90; 95% CI: 0.41–8.81; p = 0.41). Conclusions: In recipients with normal preoperative cTnI, myocardial injury LDLT may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes during a hospital stay, but the results were inconsistent at 1-year follow-up. Although routine follow-up of postoperative hs-cTnI, even in patients with normal preoperative levels, might still help predict the clinical outcome of LDLT. In future large and more representative studies are needed to establish the potential role of cTns in perioperative cardiac risk stratification

Omicron Variants of the SARS-COV-2: A Potentially Significant Threat in a New Wave of Infections

From the beginning, the COVID-19 pandemic turned out to be a huge challenge and burden for medical services [1]. Currently, humanity is dealing with a new wave of the virus that has evolved and presents a new challenge, mainly due to its ability to avoid immune surveillance. Indeed, our main line of defense — vaccines — may be compromised. Omicron variants are characterized by an evolutionary force unprecedented so far. Among the several sublines that have already emerged, the BA.5 strain exhibit higher transmissibility and demonstrates a worrisome immune evasion. According to several laboratory investigations, vaccination-induced antibodies are less successful at preventing BA.4/5 strains infection as opposed to the infections following BA.1/BA.2 strains exposure [2–6]. The hyper contagious BA.5 variant is mainly responsible for the rise in hospital and intensive care unit utilization we are facing in the current times. Within a few months, BA.5 outperformed its forerunners and became the dominant strain in the United States (US). According to the most recent statistics provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), this subvariant was responsible for nearly 2 out of every 3 new COVID-19 infections in the US (3.07.2022–9.07.2022) [7]