6 research outputs found
Understanding the potential impact of different drug properties on SARS-CoV-2 transmission and disease burden : a modelling analysis
Q1Q1Background
The unprecedented public health impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has motivated a rapid
search for potential therapeutics, with some key successes. However, the potential impact of
different treatments, and consequently research and procurement priorities, have not been clear.
Methods and Findings
develop a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, COVID-19 disease and
clinical care to explore the potential public-health impact of a range of different potential
therapeutics, under a range of different scenarios varying: i) healthcare capacity, ii) epidemic
trajectories; and iii) drug efficacy in the absence of supportive care. In each case, the outcome
of interest was the number of COVID-19 deaths averted in scenarios with the therapeutic
compared to scenarios without. We find the impact of drugs like dexamethasone (which are
delivered to the most critically-ill in hospital and whose therapeutic benefit is expected to
depend on the availability of supportive care such as oxygen and mechanical ventilation) is
likely to be limited in settings where healthcare capacity is lowest or where uncontrolled
epidemics result in hospitals being overwhelmed. As such, it may avert 22% of deaths in highincome countries but only 8% in low-income countries (assuming R=1.35). Therapeutics for
different patient populations (those not in hospital, early in the course of infection) and types
of benefit (reducing disease severity or infectiousness, preventing hospitalisation) could have
much greater benefits, particularly in resource-poor settings facing large epidemics.
Conclusions
There is a global asymmetry in who is likely to benefit from advances in the treatment of
COVID-19 to date, which have been focussed on hospitalised-patients and predicated on an
assumption of adequate access to supportive care. Therapeutics that can feasibly be delivered
to those earlier in the course of infection that reduce the need for healthcare or reduce
infectiousness could have significant impact, and research into their efficacy and means of
delivery should be a priorityRevista Internacional - Indexad
The incidence, characteristics, impact and risk factors of post-COVID chronic pain in Thailand: A single-center cross-sectional study.
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected millions of individuals worldwide. Pain has emerged as a significant post-COVID-19 symptom. This study investigated the incidence, characteristics, and risk factors of post-COVID chronic pain (PCCP) in Thailand. A cross-sectional study was conducted in participants who had been infected, including those hospitalized and monitored at home by SARS-CoV-2 from August to September 2021. Data were collected for screening from medical records, and phone interviews were done between 3 to 6 months post-infection. Participants were classified into 1) no-pain, 2) PCCP, 3) chronic pain that has been aggravated by COVID-19, or 4) chronic pain that has not been aggravated by COVID-19. Pain interference and quality of life were evaluated with the Brief Pain Inventory and EuroQol Five Dimensions Five Levels Questionnaire. From 1,019 participants, 90% of the participants had mild infection, assessed by WHO progression scale. The overall incidence of PCCP was 3.2% (95% CI 2.3-4.5), with 2.8% (95% CI 2.0-4.1) in mild infection, 5.2% (95% CI 1.2-14.1) in moderate infection and 8.5% (95% CI 3.4-19.9) in severe infection. Most participants (83.3%) reported pain in the back and lower extremities and were classified as musculoskeletal pain and headache (8.3%). Risk factors associated with PCCP, included female sex (relative risk [RR] 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.9) and greater COVID-19 severity (RR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-11.7). Participants with COVID-19-related exacerbated chronic pain displayed higher pain interferences and lower utility scores than other groups. In conclusion, this study highlights the incidence, features, and risk factors of post-COVID chronic pain (PCCP) in Thailand. It emphasizes the need to monitor and address PCCP, especially in severe cases, among females, and individuals with a history of chronic pain to improve their quality of life in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic
Table_1_Characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study in Thailand.DOCX
IntroductionData on the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Thailand are limited.ObjectiveTo determine characteristics and outcomes and identify risk factors for hospital mortality for hospitalized patients with COVID-19.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who had COVID-19 infection and were admitted to the cohort ward or ICUs at Siriraj Hospital between January 2020 and December 2021.ResultsOf the 2,430 patients included in this study, 229 (9.4%) died; the mean age was 54 years, 40% were men, 81% had at least one comorbidity, and 13% required intensive care unit (ICU). Favipiravir (86%) was the main antiviral treatment. Corticosteroids and rescue anti-inflammatory therapy were used in 74 and 6%, respectively. Admission to the ICU was the only factor associated with reduced mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.05, P ConclusionThe overall mortality of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was 9%. The only factor associated with reduced mortality was admission to the ICU. Therefore, appropriate selection of patients for admission to the ICU, strategies to limit disease progression and prevent intubation, and early detection and prompt treatment of nosocomial infection can improve survival in these patients.</p
sj-docx-1-nah-10.1177_02601060221136918 - Supplemental material for A high-protein peptide-based enteral formula improves diarrhea in tube-fed patients: A prospective multicenter study
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-nah-10.1177_02601060221136918 for A high-protein peptide-based enteral formula improves diarrhea in tube-fed patients: A prospective multicenter study by Sornwichate Rattanachaiwong, Tippawan Siritientong, Veeradej Pisprasert, Pranithi Hongsprabhas, Phitphiboon Deawtrakulchai, Somkit Williams, Naluttaporn Suebsoh, Sidarut Samuksaman, Phayom Bunsut, Pornpoj Pramyothin, Nanta Khumkhana, Pennapa Tipsung, Mayura Vattanapongpisan and Panuwat Promsin in Nutrition and Health</p
Global Survey of Outcomes of Neurocritical Care Patients: Analysis of the PRINCE Study Part 2
BACKGROUND: Neurocritical care is devoted to the care of critically ill patients with acute neurological or neurosurgical emergencies. There is limited information regarding epidemiological data, disease characteristics, variability of clinical care, and in-hospital mortality of neurocritically ill patients worldwide. We addressed these issues in the Point PRevalence In Neurocritical CarE (PRINCE) study, a prospective, cross-sectional, observational study. METHODS: We recruited patients from various intensive care units (ICUs) admitted on a pre-specified date, and the investigators recorded specific clinical care activities they performed on the subjects during their first 7 days of admission or discharge (whichever came first) from their ICUs and at hospital discharge. In this manuscript, we analyzed the final data set of the study that included patient admission characteristics, disease type and severity, ICU resources, ICU and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. We present descriptive statistics to summarize data from the case report form. We tested differences between geographically grouped data using parametric and nonparametric testing as appropriate. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to evaluate factors associated with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 1545 patients admitted to 147 participating sites from 31 countries of which most were from North America (69%, N = 1063). Globally, there was variability in patient characteristics, admission diagnosis, ICU treatment team and resource allocation, and in-hospital mortality. Seventy-three percent of the participating centers were academic, and the most common admitting diagnosis was subarachnoid hemorrhage (13%). The majority of patients were male (59%), a half of whom had at least two comorbidities, and median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality included age (OR 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.04); lower GCS (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.16 for every point reduction in GCS); pupillary reactivity (OR 1.8; 95% CI, 1.09 to 3.23 for bilateral unreactive pupils); admission source (emergency room versus direct admission [OR 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.75]; admission from a general ward versus direct admission [OR 5.85; 95% CI, 2.75 to 12.45; and admission from another ICU versus direct admission [OR 3.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 8.8]); and the absence of a dedicated neurocritical care unit (NCCU) (OR 1.7; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.47). CONCLUSION: PRINCE is the first study to evaluate care patterns of neurocritical patients worldwide. The data suggest that there is a wide variability in clinical care resources and patient characteristics. Neurological severity of illness and the absence of a dedicated NCCU are independent predictors of in-patient mortality.status: publishe