852 research outputs found

    Gaps in the Main-Sequence of Star Cluster Hertzsprung Russell Diagrams

    Full text link
    The presence of gaps or regions of small numbers of stars in the main sequence of the Hertzsprung Russell Diagram (HRD) of star clusters has been reported in literature. This is interesting and significant as it could be related to star formation and/or rapid evolution or instabilities. In this paper, using Gaia DR3 photometry and confirmed membership data, we explore the HRD of nine open clusters with reported gaps, identify them and assess their importance and spectral types.Comment: Accepted in Bulletin de la Soci\'et\'e Royale des Sciences de Li\`eg

    Membership of Stars in Open Clusters using Random Forest with Gaia Data

    Full text link
    Membership of stars in open clusters is one of the most crucial parameters in studies of star clusters. Gaia opened a new window in the estimation of membership because of its unprecedented 6-D data. In the present study, we used published membership data of nine open star clusters as a training set to find new members from Gaia DR2 data using a supervised random forest model with a precision of around 90\%. The number of new members found is often double the published number. Membership probability of a larger sample of stars in clusters is a major benefit in determination of cluster parameters like distance, extinction and mass functions. We also found members in the outer regions of the cluster and found sub-structures in the clusters studied. The color magnitude diagrams are more populated and enriched by the addition of new members making their study more promising.Comment: Accepted for publication in The European Physical Journal ST, Special Issue on Modeling Machine Learning and Astronom

    The enhanced YSO population in Serpens

    Full text link
    The Serpens Molecular Cloud is one of the most active sites of ongoing star formation at a distance of about 300 pc, and hence is very well-suited for studies of young low-mass stars and sub-stellar objects. In this paper, for the Serpens star forming region, we find potential members of the Young Stellar Objects population from the Gaia DR3 data and study their kinematics and distribution. We compile a catalog of 656 YSOs from available catalogs ranging from X-ray to the infrared. We use this as a reference set and cross-match it to find 87 Gaia DR3 member stars to produce a control sample with revised parameters. We queried the DR3 catalog with these parameters and found 1196 stars. We then applied three different density-based machine learning algorithms (DBSCAN, OPTICS and HDBSCAN) to this sample and found potential YSOs. The three clustering algorithms identified a common set of 822 YSO members from Gaia DR3 in this region. We also classified these objects using 2MASS and WISE data to study their distribution and the progress of star formation in Serpens.Comment: Accepted in Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy (JoAA

    Using GMM in Open Cluster Membership: An Insight

    Full text link
    The unprecedented precision of Gaia has led to a paradigm shift in membership determination of open clusters where a variety of machine learning (ML) models can be employed. In this paper, we apply the unsupervised Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to a sample of thirteen clusters with varying ages (log t≈log \ t \approx 6.38-9.64) and distances (441-5183 pc) from Gaia DR3 data to determine membership. We use ASteca to determine parameters for the clusters from our revised membership data. We define a quantifiable metric Modified Silhouette Score (MSS) to evaluate its performance. We study the dependence of MSS on age, distance, extinction, galactic latitude and longitude, and other parameters to find the particular cases when GMM seems to be more efficient than other methods. We compared GMM for nine clusters with varying ages but we did not find any significant differences between GMM performance for younger and older clusters. But we found a moderate correlation between GMM performance and the cluster distance, where GMM works better for closer clusters. We find that GMM does not work very well for clusters at distances larger than 3~kpc.Comment: Accepted in Astronomy & Computin
    • …
    corecore