Charged Particle Motion in a Highly Ionized Plasma

A recently introduced method utilizing dimensional continuation is employed to compute the energy loss rate for a non-relativistic particle moving through a highly ionized plasma. No restriction is made on the charge, mass, or speed of this particle. It is, however, assumed that the plasma is not strongly coupled in the sense that the dimensionless plasma coupling parameter g=e^2\kappa_D/ 4\pi T is small, where \kappa_D is the Debye wave number of the plasma. To leading and next-to-leading order in this coupling, dE/dx is of the generic form g^2 \ln[C g^2]. The precise numerical coefficient out in front of the logarithm is well known. We compute the constant C under the logarithm exactly for arbitrary particle speeds. Our exact results differ from approximations given in the literature. The differences are in the range of 20% for cases relevant to inertial confinement fusion experiments. The same method is also employed to compute the rate of momentum loss for a projectile moving in a plasma, and the rate at which two plasmas at different temperatures come into thermal equilibrium. Again these calculations are done precisely to the order given above. The loss rates of energy and momentum uniquely define a Fokker-Planck equation that describes particle motion in the plasma. The coefficients determined in this way are thus well-defined, contain no arbitrary parameters or cutoffs, and are accurate to the order described. This Fokker-Planck equation describes the longitudinal straggling and the transverse diffusion of a beam of particles. It should be emphasized that our work does not involve a model, but rather it is a precisely defined evaluation of the leading terms in a well-defined perturbation theory.Comment: Comments: Published in Phys. Rep. 410/4 (2005) 237; RevTeX, 111 Pages, 17 Figures; Transcription error corrected in temperature equilibration rate (3.61) and (12.44) which replaces \gamma-2 by \gamma-

Rigorous theory of nuclear fusion rates in a plasma

Real-time thermal field theory is used to reveal the structure of plasma corrections to nuclear reactions. Previous results are recovered in a fashion that clarifies their nature, and new extensions are made. Brown and Yaffe have introduced the methods of effective quantum field theory into plasma physics. They are used here to treat the interesting limiting case of dilute but very highly charged particles reacting in a dilute, one-component plasma. The highly charged particles are very strongly coupled to this background plasma. The effective field theory proves that this mean field solution plus the one-loop term dominate; higher loop corrections are negligible even though the problem involves strong coupling. Such analytic results for very strong coupling are rarely available, and they can serve as benchmarks for testing computer models.Comment: 4 pages and 2 figures, presented at SCCS 2005, June 20-25, Moscow, Russi

Charged Particle Motion in a Plasma: Electron-Ion Energy Partition

A charged particle traversing a plasma loses its energy to both plasma electrons and ions. We compute the energy partition, the fractions $E_e/E_0$ and E_\smI/E_0 of the initial energy $E_0$ of this `impurity particle' that are deposited into the electrons and ions when it has slowed down into an equilibrium distribution that we shall determine. We use a well-defined Fokker-Planck equation for the phase space distribution of the charged impurity particles in a weakly to moderately coupled plasma. The Fokker-Planck equation holds to first sub-leading order in the dimensionless plasma coupling constant, which means we compute to order $n\ln n$ (leading) and $n$ (sub-leading) in the plasma density $n$. Previously, the order $n$ terms had been estimated, not calculated. Since the charged particle does not come to rest, the energy loss obtained by an integration of a $dE/dx$ has an ambiguity of order of the plasma temperature. Our Fokker-Planck formulation provides an unambiguous, precise definition of the energy fractions. For equal electron and ion temperatures, we find that our precise results agree well with a fit obtained by Fraley, Linnebur, Mason, and Morse. The case with differing electron and ion temperatures, a case of great importance for nuclear fusion, will be investigated in detail in the present paper. The energy partitions for this general case, partitions that have not been obtained before, will be presented. We find that now the proper solution of the Fokker-Planck equation yields a quasi-static equilibrium distribution to which fast particles relax that has neither the electron nor the ion temperature. This "schizophrenic" final ensemble of slowed particles gives a new mechanism to bring the electron and ion temperatures together. The rate at which this new mechanism brings the electrons and ions in the plasma into thermal equilibrium will be computed.Comment: Improved abstract, introduction, and conclusion

Analysis of Dislocation Mechanism for Melting of Elements: Pressure Dependence

In the framework of melting as a dislocation-mediated phase transition we derive an equation for the pressure dependence of the melting temperatures of the elements valid up to pressures of order their ambient bulk moduli. Melting curves are calculated for Al, Mg, Ni, Pb, the iron group (Fe, Ru, Os), the chromium group (Cr, Mo, W), the copper group (Cu, Ag, Au), noble gases (Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe, Rn), and six actinides (Am, Cm, Np, Pa, Th, U). These calculated melting curves are in good agreement with existing data. We also discuss the apparent equivalence of our melting relation and the Lindemann criterion, and the lack of the rigorous proof of their equivalence. We show that the would-be mathematical equivalence of both formulas must manifest itself in a new relation between the Gr\"{u}neisen constant, bulk and shear moduli, and the pressure derivative of the shear modulus.Comment: 19 pages, LaTeX, 9 eps figure

Dislocation-Mediated Melting: The One-Component Plasma Limit

The melting parameter $\Gamma_m$ of a classical one-component plasma is estimated using a relation between melting temperature, density, shear modulus, and crystal coordination number that follows from our model of dislocation-mediated melting. We obtain $\Gamma_m=172\pm 35,$ in good agreement with the results of numerous Monte-Carlo calculations.Comment: 8 pages, LaTe