Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in Australian isolates of Clostridium difficile, 2013–14

Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the activity of fidaxomicin and comparator antimicrobials against Clostridium difficile isolated from patients with C. difficile infection (CDI) in Australian hospitals and in the community. Methods: One private and one public laboratory from five states in Australia submitted a total of 474 isolates/PCR-positive stool samples during three collection periods in August-September 2013 (n=175), February-March 2014 (n=134) and August-September 2014 (n=165). Isolate identification was confirmed by selective culture for C. difficile and a proportion of isolates from each state were characterized by PCR for toxin genes and PCR ribotyping. MICs of fidaxomicin and eight comparator antimicrobials were determined for all isolates using agar methodology. Results: Site collection yielded 440 isolates of C. difficile and PCR revealed a heterogeneous strain population comprising 37 different PCR ribotypes (RTs), 95% of whichwere positive for tcdA and tcdB (A+B+). The most common RTs were 014 (29.8%) and 002 (15.9%). Epidemic RT 027 was not identified; however, small numbers of virulent RTs 078 and 244 were found. Resistance to vancomycin, metronidazole and fidaxomicin was not detected and resistance to moxifloxacin was very low (3.4%). Fidaxomicin showed potent in vitro activity against all 440 isolates (MIC50/MIC90 0.03/0.12 mg/L) and was superior to metronidazole (MIC50/MIC90 0.25/0.5 mg/L) and vancomycin (MIC50/MIC90 1/2 mg/L). Conclusions: These data confirm the potent in vitro activity of fidaxomicin against C. difficile. Moreover, this study provides an important baseline for ongoing long-term surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and prospective tracking of prominent and emerging strain types

Laboratory-based surveillance of Clostridium difficile Infection in Australian health care and community settings, 2013 to 2018

In the early 2000s, a binary toxin (CDT)-producing strain of Clostridium difficile, ribotype 027 (RT027), caused extensive outbreaks of diarrheal disease in North America and Europe. This strain has not become established in Australia, and there is a markedly different repertoire of circulating strains there compared to other regions of the world. The C. difficile Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CDARS) study is a nationwide longitudinal surveillance study of C. difficile infection (CDI) in Australia. Here, we describe the molecular epidemiology of CDI in Australian health care and community settings over the first 5 years of the study, 2013 to 2018. Between 2013 and 2018, 10 diagnostic microbiology laboratories from five states in Australia participated in the CDARS study. From each of five states, one private (representing community) and one public (representing hospitals) laboratory submitted isolates of C. difficile or PCR-positive stool samples during two collection periods per year, February-March (summer/autumn) and August-September (winter/spring). C. difficile was characterized by toxin gene profiling and ribotyping. A total of 1,523 isolates of C. difficile were studied. PCR ribotyping yielded 203 different RTs, the most prevalent being RT014/020 (n = 449; 29.5%). The epidemic CDT+ RT027 (n = 2) and RT078 (n = 6), and the recently described RT251 (n = 10) and RT244 (n = 6) were not common, while RT126 (n = 17) was the most prevalent CDT+ type. A heterogeneous C. difficile population was identified. C. difficile RT014/020 was the most prevalent type found in humans with CDI. Continued surveillance of CDI in Australia remains critical for the detection of emerging strain lineages

Refugee Hospitality in Lebanon and Turkey. On Making ‘The Other’

This paper examines the hospitality provided to Syrian refugees during the refugee crisis spanning from 2011 to 2016 in the border areas of Gaziantep (southeastern Turkey) and the Akkar region (northern Lebanon). Hospitality, apart from a cultural value and societal response to the protracted refugee influx, is a discursive strategy of socio‐spatial control used by humanitarian agencies, local and national authorities. This paper, first, argues against hospitality as an assessment to ethically compare host countries (i.e. more welcoming versus less welcoming states). Second, drawing on Walters’ notion of “humanitarian border”, it shows how the governmental, humanitarian, and everyday workings of hospitality exercise an assertive politics of sovereignty over the social encounter between locals and refugees. We examine the state‐centered hospitality in the Turkish case and a humanitarian‐promoted hospitality in the Lebanese case. We also show how the hospitality discourse shapes the spaces that refugees, citizens, and earlier migrants partake in

Species richness coincidence: Conservation strategies based on predictive modelling

SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe