666 research outputs found

    ITalian Excluder Registry and results of Gore Excluder endograft for the treatment of elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Get PDF
    BackgroundTo report the midterm results of elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in a multicenter, clinical unsponsored registry using the Gore Excluder endograft.MethodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of a multicenter, prospective registry that involved nine centers in Italy. Periodic clinical and radiographic follow-up with computed tomography scans were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure, and on a yearly basis thereafter.ResultsA total of 872 patients underwent elective EVAR. Primary technical success was 97.5%, and hospital mortality was 1.0% (9/872). At least 816 (93.6%) patients underwent a follow-up control. Freedom from all-cause death was estimated to be 97.9% at 1 year, 93.4% at 3 years, and 88.5% at 5 years. Aneurysm-related mortality was 1.6% (n = 13) with only two late AAA-related deaths observed at 21 and 36 months. Significant predictors of all-cause mortality included age (P < .001) and AAA maximum diameter (P = .027). Overall conversion rate was 2.3% (n = 19). Mean elapsed time from initial intervention to surgical conversion was 23 ± 18 months (range, 0-52 months). Late rupture was detected in four (0.5%) cases: two of these patients died after conversion. The rate of any reintervention was 9.4% (n = 77); most of them were required within the first 24 months. The leading cause of reintervention was endoleak (n = 41; 5.0%). Limb thrombosis occurred in nine (1.1%) cases. Freedom from reintervention at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up were 98.6%, 94.6%, and 86.5%.ConclusionsThe ITalian Gore Excluder Registry is the largest clinical unsponsored registry using a single device, with the longest follow-up period so far. The present experience confirms the effectiveness of EVAR using the Gore Excluder with low rates of mortality, migration, reintervention, and limb thrombosis

    A 20-year experience with surgical management of true and false internal carotid artery aneurysms

    Get PDF
    Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse early and late results of surgical management of internal carotid artery (ICA) true and false aneurysms in a single-centre experience. Materials and methods: From January 1988 to December 2011, 50 consecutive interventions for ICA aneurismal disease were performed; interventions were performed for true ICA aneurysm in 19 cases (group 1) and for ICA post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) pseudo-aneurysm in the remaining 31 (group 2). Early results (&lt;30 days) were evaluated in terms of mortality, stroke and cranial nerves' injury and compared between the two groups with χ2 test. Follow-up results (stroke free-survival, freedom from ICA thrombosis and reintervention) were analysed with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with log-rank test. Results: All the patients in group 1 had open repair of their ICA aneurysm; in group 2 open repair was performed in 30 cases, while three patients with post-CEA aneurysm without signs of infection had a covered stent placed. There were no perioperative deaths. Two major strokes occurred in group 1 and one major stroke occurred in group 2 (p = 0.1). The rates of postoperative cranial nerve injuries were 10.5% in group 1 and 13% in group 2 (p = 0.8). Median duration of follow-up was 60 months (range 1-276). Estimated 10-year stroke-free survival rates were 64% in group 1 and 37% in group 2 (p = 0.4, log rank 0.5); thrombosis-free survival at 10 years was 66% in group 1 and 34% in group 2 (p = 0.2, log rank 1.2), while the corresponding figures in terms of reintervention-free survival were 68% and 33%, respectively (p = 0.2, log rank 1.8). Conclusions: Surgical treatment of ICA aneurismal disease provided in our experience satisfactory early and long-term results, without significant differences between true and false aneurysms. In carefully selected patients with non-infected false aneurysm, the endovascular option seems to be feasible.© 2012 European Society for Vascular Surgery

    Endovascular Treatment of Aorto-iliac Aneurysms: Four-year Results of Iliac Branch Endograft

    Get PDF
    Introduction: The aim of this report was to analyse early and mid-term outcomes of endovascular treatment (endovascular aneurysm repair, EVAR) for aorto-iliac aneurysms with the use of an iliac branch device (IBD). Report: A total of 85 EVAR procedures with IBD were electively carried out in 81 patients between September 2007 and August 2012. Technical success was obtained in 98.7% of the cases. The mean follow-up duration was 20.4 months (SD ± 15.4). There was one IBD occlusion (1.2%). Estimated 48 months' survival, freedom from re-intervention and branch occlusion were 76.7%, 88.3% and 98%, respectively. Conclusions: EVAR for aorto-iliac aneurysms using IBD is an effective procedure with low complication and re-intervention rates at mid-term follow-up
    corecore