Neurophthalmological conditions mimicking glaucomatous optic neuropathy: analysis of the most common causes of misdiagnosis

Background: To analyze the most common neurophthalmological conditions that may mimic glaucomatous optic neuropathy and to determine which most often lead to misdiagnosis when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist. Methods: We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with optic neuropathies caused by neurophthalmological conditions screened in a single Eye Clinic within a period of 24 months. Within these enrolled patients, we selected the eyes whose fundoscopic appearance could resemble glaucoma based in pre-defined criteria (vertical cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.6, asymmetry of the cup-to-disc ratio >= 0.2 between eyes, presence of localized retinal nerve fiber layer and/or neuroretinal rim defects, and disc haemorrhages). Then, color fundus photographs and Humphrey Visual Field tests (HVF) of these eyes were mixed with tests from 21 consecutive glaucomatous patients (42 eyes with normal tension glaucoma). These images were mixed randomly and a masked glaucoma specialist was asked to distinguish if each set of exams was from a patient with glaucoma or with a neurophthalmologic condition. Results: Among the 101 eyes (68 patients) enrolled with neurophthalmological diseases, 16 (15.8%) were classified as conditions that could mimic glaucoma. The most common diagnoses were ischemic optic neuropathy (25%), compressive optic neuropathy (18.7%) and hereditary optic neuropathy (18.7%). Based on the analysis of fundus photographs and HVF tests, 25% of these were misdiagnosed as glaucoma (two ischemic optic neuropathies and two congenital optic disc anomalies). Conversely, 11.9% of the glaucomatous neuropathies were misdiagnosed as neurophthalmological disorders. Overall, the glaucoma specialist correctly diagnosed 84.5% of the eyes. Conclusions: Some neurophthalmological disorders can mimic glaucoma. In our study, isquemic and compressive optic neuropathies were the ones that most often did so. Almost one quarter of the eyes were misdiagnosed when evaluated by a glaucoma specialist, which can lead to inadequate management and influence the prognosis of these patients.Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, BrazilHosp Med Olhos, Glaucoma Unit, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, BrazilMayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USAUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Nova técnica de sutura ajustável para trabeculectomia

PURPOSE: To describe an adjustable suture (AS) experimental model that allows for tightening, loosening and retightening of the suture tension in trabeculectomy. METHODS: Standard trabeculectomy was performed in fifteen pig eyeballs. All pig eyes were tested twice: one test with conventional suture in both flap's corners (conventional suture group) and another test with a conventional suture at one corner and an adjustable suture in the other corner (AS group). The order in which each test was performed was defined by randomization. Intraocular pressure was measured at three time points: T1) when the knots were tightened; T2) when the AS was loosened or the conventional knot was removed; and T3) when the AS was retightened in the AS group or five minutes after the knot removal in the conventional suture group. RESULTS: The mean Intraocular pressure was similar between the two groups at time point 1 (p=0.97). However, significant Intraocular pressure differences were found between eyes in the conventional and adjustable suture groups at time points 2 (12.6 ± 4.2 vs 16.3 ± 2.3 cmH2O, respectively, p=0.006) and 3 (12.2 ± 4.0 vs 26.4 ± 1.7cmH2O, respectively; p=0.001). While the conventional technique allowed only Intraocular pressure reduction (following the knot removal; T2 and T3), the AS technique allowed both Intraocular pressure reduction (T2) and elevation (T3) through the management (loosening and retightening) of the suture. CONCLUSION: This experimental model provides an effective noninvasive postoperative mechanism of suture tension adjustment.OBJETIVO: Descrever uma nova técnica de sutura ajustável para o flap da trabeculectomia (TREC), que permite apertar e folgar a sutura no pós-operatório. MÉTODOS: Foram realizadas trabeculectoomia em 15 olhos de porco. Todos os olhos de porco foram testados duas vezes; um teste com sutura convencional nas duas extremidades do flap(grupo sutura convencional), outro teste com sutura convencional em uma das extremidades e na outra extremidade a sutura ajustável proposta por esse trabalho (grupo sutura ajustável). A ordem de qual teste seria realizado primeiro em cada olho foi definida por sorteio. A pressão intraocular foi medida de forma direta em três momentos: T1) Todas as suturas apertadas; T2) Após lise de uma sutura convencional ou de afrouxar a sutura ajustável; T3) Após apertar novamente a sutura ajustável ou no caso do teste com as duas suturas convencionais após 5 minutos da lise de uma das suturas. RESULTADOS: No primeiro momento de medida da pressão intraocular (T1) as pressões médias foram similares entre os dois grupos (p=0.97). No entanto, diferenças significativas em relação a pressão intraocular foram encontradas entre os grupos de sutura convencional e ajustável nos tempos 2 (12,6 ± 4,2 vs 16,3 ± 2,3 cmH2O, respectivamente; p=0,006) e 3 (12,2 ± 4,0 vs 26,4 ± 1.7cmH2O, respectivamente; p=0,001). Enquanto a técnica convencional permitiu somente a redução da pressão intraocular após a remoção da sutura (T2 e T3), a técnica de sutura ajustável permitiu tanto a redução (T2) quanto a elevação da pressão intraocular (T3) através do manejo da sutura. CONCLUSÃO: Esse modelo experimental demonstrou a eficácia de uma possível técnica não-invasiva para ajuste da tensão da sutura do flapno pós-operatório da trabeculectomia.Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Department of OphthalmologyUNIFESP, Department of OphthalmologySciEL

Analysis of neuroretinal rim distribution and vascular pattern in eyes with presumed large physiological cupping: a comparative study

Background: To investigate possible differences in neuroretinal rim distribution, vascular pattern, and peripapillary region appearance between eyes with presumed large physiological optic disc cupping (pLPC) and eyes with minimal optic disc excavation.Methods: We prospectively enrolled consecutive subjects with pLPC and individuals with minimal excavation (optic disc excavation within normal limits; control group). All eyes had normal visual fields and untreated intraocular pressure (IOP) = 0.6 and >= 30 months of follow-up with no evidence of glaucomatous neuropathy. for controls, VCDR was limited to <= 0.5. We compared ocular signs and characteristics related to the neuroretinal rim distribution, vascular pattern, peripapillary region appearance and disc size between groups. Whenever both eyes were eligible, one was randomly selected for analysis.Results: A total of 74 patients (mean age, 45.6 +/- 14.9 years) with pLPC and 45 controls (mean age, 44.8 +/- 11.6 years) were enrolled (p = 0.76). Median disc size and VCDR was significantly larger in eyes with pLPC compared to controls (p < 0.01). the proportion of eyes with violation of the ISNT rule, laminar dot sign, nasal shifting of the central vessels, nasal excavation and baring of circumlinear vessel was significantly greater in the eyes with pLPC compared to controls (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences regarding the proportions of eyes with peripapillary atrophy between groups (p < 0.09). Finally, disc size was significantly associated with VCDR (r(2) = 0.47, p < 0.01), with an increase of 0.21 in VCDR for each 1 mm(2) in disc area.Conclusion: Compared to normal controls, eyes with pLPC may present a higher proportion of optic nerve head findings frequently observed in glaucomatous eyes. This seems to be explained in part by the larger discs found in these eyes. We believe care should be taken while classifying them as glaucomatous or not based solely on these characteristics.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-04021001 São Paulo, BrazilHosp Med Olhos, Glaucoma Unit, BR-06018180 Osasco, SP, BrazilMayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USAUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Ophthalmol, BR-04021001 São Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Macular Inner Retinal Layer Thinning in Diabetic Patients without Retinopathy Measured by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

The aim of this study was to use Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) to measure the thickness of the Macular Inner Retinal Layer (MIRL) and compare the results between diabetic patients with no signs of retinopathy and healthy subjects. Overall, 47 type 2 diabetic patients without clinical signs of retinopathy were prospectively analyzed along with 36 healthy subjects. This study excluded patients with other systemic or ocular diseases. All patients had their MIRL thickness measured by RTVue-100 SD-OCT (7x7 mm macular grid). The MIRL thickness is provided by the ganglion cell complex scan (comprised of the retinal nerve fiber, ganglion cell, and inner plexiform layers). Only one eye was randomly selected if both were eligible for analysis. Mean age was similar between the two groups (diabetic patients: 57.3 ± 10.6 and control subjects: 60.2 ± 12.2 years) (P = 0.19). No significant differences regarding optic disc area and cup-to-disc ratio was observed in the comparison of the two groups (P ≥ 0.38 for both comparisons). In patients with diabetes, the average MIRL was significantly thinner when compared to controls (91.6 versus 96.2 micrometer (µm); P = 0.02). Regional analysis revealed superior and inferior MIRL to be significantly thinner in patients with diabetes than the controls (P ≤ 0.04). The juxtafoveal area was compromised (thinned) in 70% of diabetic eyes, classified as abnormal (P &lt; 1%; compared to the device’s normative database). In conclusion, patients with type 2 diabetes without clinical evidence of retinopathy had lower MIRL average values when compared to the control group. This can be explained by the ischemia and retinal tissue injury caused by diabetes even in early stages of diabetic retinopathy, which can affect MIRL thickness. Possible implications of these findings on diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy requires further investigation