24 research outputs found
Elevated Body Mass Index Is Associated with Secondary Hypogonadism among Men Presenting to a Tertiary Academic Medical Center
Purpose: To characterize the population of hypogonadal men who presented to a tertiary academic urology clinic and evalu-ate risk factors for primary vs. secondary hypogonadism.
Materials and Methods: We evaluated all men with International Classification of Diseases-9 diagnosis codes R68.82 and 799.81 for low libido, 257.2 for testicular hypofunction, and E29.1 for other testicular hypofunction at a tertiary academic medical center from 2013 to 2017. We included men who had testosterone (T) and luteinizing hormone (LH) drawn on the same day. We classified men based on T and LH levels into eugonadal, primary, secondary, and compensated hypogonad-ism. Risk factors including age, body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg/m2, current smoking status, alcohol use greater than 5 days per week, and Charlson comorbidity index greater than or equal to 1 were investigated and measured in each group using the eugonadal group for reference.
Results: Among the 231 men who had both T and LH levels, 7.4%, 42.4%, and 7.4% were classified as primary, secondary, and compensated hypogonadism, respectively. Only elevated BMI was associated with secondary hypogonadism compared to eugonadal men (median BMI, 30.93 kg/m2 vs. 27.69 kg/m2, p=0.003). BMI, age, comorbidities, smoking, or alcohol use did not appear to predict diagnosis of secondary hypogonadism.
Conclusions: Secondary hypogonadism appears to be the most common cause of hypogonadism among men complaining of low T and decreased libido at a tertiary academic medical center. Secondary hypogonadism is associated with elevated BMI and therefore obesity should be used as a marker to evaluate men for both T and LH levels
Recommended from our members
MP07-15 LANGUAGE-RELATED DISPARITIES IN ACUTE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT FOLLOWING PELVIC FLOOR RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Kidney Autotransplantation: Between the Past and the Future
Purpose of Review
The practice of kidney autotransplantation (KAT) has become an increasingly favorable approach in the treatment of certain renovascular, ureteral, and malignant pathologies. Current KAT literature describes conventional open procedures, which are associated with substantial risks. We sought to compare previously reported outcomes, evaluate common surgical indications, and assess associated risks and benefits of current KAT methods. A thorough evaluation and review of the literature was performed with the keywords “autologous transplantation” and “kidney.”
Recent Findings
Early outcomes of robotic KAT are encouraging and have been associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital stay, but require robotic technique proficiency.
Summary
KAT is an important method to manage selected complex urological pathologies. Robotic KAT is promising. Nevertheless, future studies should utilize larger patient cohorts to better assess the risks and benefits of KAT and to further validate this approach
Recommended from our members
Abstract 2149: West African genetic ancestry and origin of the BRCA1 locus in Jamaican men with high grade prostate cancer
Abstract Introduction: Men of West African (WA) ancestry are at higher risk for prostate cancer than men of European (EU) or Asian descent. Caribbean populations provide an opportunity to identify potential founder mutations that contribute to cancer risk. Jamaica has among the highest rates of prostate cancer incidence and mortality in the world and the majority of the population are of WA ancestry. However, there is a significant amount of genetic admixture of EU and Asian ancestry from historic migration patterns. Thus, the population provides a unique cohort for studying the complex interplay between genetic ancestry and prostate cancer. In this pilot study, we characterized the overall and gene locus-specific ancestry of Jamaican prostate cancer patients to explore potential associations with clinicopathologic disease features. We specifically focused this analysis on the BRCA1 locus based on its known association with inherited prostate cancer risk and also with breast cancer risk in patients from the Caribbean. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 31 Jamaican men (non-US citizens/residents) who travelled to the University of Miami (2015-2020) specifically for robotic prostatectomy were included in the analysis. DNA was prepared from normal prostate tissue and analyzed using the Illumina Global Screening Array version 3 with Multi-Disease Drop-In that includes more than 650,000 genetic markers. Both overall genetic ancestry and allele specific ancestries were determined for each study subject. Clinical and pathological features (age, PSA, stage, grade group (GG)) were also recorded and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Median age was 67 years, median pre-op PSA was 6.7. The majority of patients were cT1c (91%) and GG 2 (29%) on biopsy. On final pathology most men were ≥pT3 (51%) and the proportion of GG 1, 2 and ≥ 3 was 3%, 52% and 45% respectively. The mean overall West African genetic ancestry was 51.2% (SD 28.4%). Overall % West African ancestry was not associated with pathological GG. In contrast, 50% of the men who were homozygous for African ancestry alleles at the BRCA1 locus had high-grade prostate cancer (GG 3, 4, 5) versus 37% of the men with non-African or heterozygous BRCA1 genotypes. Conclusions: In a select cohort of Jamaican men, we found that half of patients with BRCA1 alleles derived from West African ancestry also have high grade prostate cancer. BRCA1 of African ancestral origin may contribute to the relatively high prevalence of aggressive prostate cancer in men from Jamaica. Work in progress focuses on an expanded study of associations between allele-specific genetic ancestry and prostate cancer in high-risk populations. Citation Format: Sandra M. Gaston, Anthony J. Griswold, Oleksandr N. Kryvenko, Tianjie Gu, Guan-Nan Zhang, Nachiketh S. Prakash, Yuval Avda, Tarek Ajami, Chad R. Ritch. West African genetic ancestry and origin of the BRCA1 locus in Jamaican men with high grade prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2149
Recommended from our members
Changing times: trends in risk classification, tumor upstaging, and positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy - results from a contemporary National Cancer Database study
Recent advancements in screening, prostate MRI, robotic surgery, and active surveillance have influenced the profile of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). We sought to examine their impact on trends in clinicodemographic, risk classification, and adverse pathology in men undergoing surgery.
We queried the National Cancer Database for clinicodemographic, risk group, and pathology data in men undergoing upfront RP between 2006 and 2020. Patients were categorized by NCCN risk groups, and trends were assessed among 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2020 periods. Endpoints included rates of pT3, positive surgical margins (PSM), pathologic upstaging, and Gleason grade group (GG) upgrading.
610,762 patients were included. There were significant increases in African Americans (9.8-14.1%), comorbidities (2.1-5.2% with Charlson scores > 1), and robot-assisted RP (78-84%). Over the three time periods, high-risk cases increased from 15 to 20 to 27%, and intermediate-risk from 54 to 51 to 60%. Overall rates of pT3 rose from 20 to 38%, and PSM from 20 to 27% (p < 0.001). Pathologic upstaging increased in low (6-15%), intermediate (20-33%), and high-risk groups (42-58%) -p < 0.001. Gleason upgrading rose in low-risk (45-59%, p < 0.001), with slight reductions in the intermediate and high-risk groups.
Recent trends in RP indicate a shift towards more advanced disease, evidenced by increasing rates of pT3, PSM, and pathologic upstaging across all NCCN risk groups. These findings emphasize the need for a careful balance in applying fascia and nerve-sparing techniques to avoid compromising oncological safety
Recommended from our members
MP68-14 CHANGING TIMES: TRENDS IN TUMOR UPSTAGING AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. RESULTS FROM A CONTEMPORARY NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE STUDY
Recommended from our members
PD34-03 RACIAL DISPARITY IN THE UTILIZATION OF NEW THERAPIES FOR ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Black and Hispanic patients have a high burden of prostate cancer mortality and this may be related to barriers to treatment. In 2010, Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy was the ..
Recommended from our members
MP68-18 BALANCING PRECISION AND CAUTION: THE DILEMMA OF FASCIA AND NERVE-SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY AMIDST THE SURGE OF HIGH-RISK CANCER: RESULTS FROM A CONTEMPORARY NATIONAL CANCER DATABASE STUDY
Re-examining Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Density: Defining the Optimal PSA Range and Patients for Using PSA Density to Predict Prostate Cancer Using Extended Template Biopsy
To compare the predictive accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density vs PSA across different PSA ranges and by prior biopsy status in a prospective cohort undergoing prostate biopsy.
Men from a prospective trial underwent an extended template biopsy to evaluate for prostate cancer at 26 sites throughout the United States. The area under the receiver operating curve assessed the predictive accuracy of PSA density vs PSA across 3 PSA ranges (10 ng/mL). We also investigated the effect of varying the PSA density cutoffs on the detection of cancer and assessed the performance of PSA density vs PSA in men with or without a prior negative biopsy.
Among 1290 patients, 585 (45%) and 284 (22%) men had prostate cancer and significant prostate cancer, respectively. PSA density performed better than PSA in detecting any prostate cancer within a PSA of 4-10 ng/mL (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.70 vs 0.53, P 10 mg/mL (AUC: 0.84 vs 0.65, P < .0001). PSA density was significantly more predictive than PSA in detecting any prostate cancer in men without (AUC: 0.73 vs 0.67, P < .0001) and with (AUC: 0.69 vs 0.55, P < .0001) a previous biopsy; however, the incremental difference in AUC was higher among men with a previous negative biopsy. Similar inferences were seen for significant cancer across all analyses.
As PSA increases, PSA density becomes a better marker for predicting prostate cancer compared with PSA alone. Additionally, PSA density performed better than PSA in men with a prior negative biopsy