Why is adiabatic compressed air energy storage yet to become a viable energy storage option?

Recent theoretical studies have predicted that adiabatic compressed air energy storage (ACAES) can be an effective energy storage option in the future. However, major experimental projects and commercial ventures have so far failed to yield any viable prototypes. Here we explore the underlying reasons behind this failure. By developing an analytical idealized model of a typical ACAES design, we derive a design-dependent efficiency limit for a system with hypothetical, perfect components. This previously overlooked limit, equal to 93.6% under continuous cycling for a typical design, arises from irreversibility associated with the transient pressure in the system. Although the exact value is design dependent, the methodology we present for finding the limit is applicable for a wide range of designs. Turning to real systems, the limit alone does not fully explain the failure of practical ACAES research. However, reviewing the available evidence alongside our analytical model, we reason that underestimation of the system complexity, difficulty with the integration of off-the-shelf components, and a number of misleading performance claims are the primary reasons hindering ACAES development.</p

How pressure affects costs of power conversion machinery in compressed air energy storage; Part I:Compressors and expanders

This study addresses a critical economic aspect in compressed air energy storage that has not been discussed much in existing literature: the impact of operating pressure on machinery capital cots. It aims to answer whether the cost per unit of power for power conversion systems changes with the maximum storage pressure. Considering that higher storage pressures are associated with greater energy density, enhanced energy storage capabilities and improved system efficiency. This paper helps clarify uncertainties in initial cost estimations for power-generation plants. Effects of operating pressure on the components and overall sizes and consequently costs of power conversion machinery are individually investigated in two parts. Part I encompasses the compressor and expanders, and part II comprehensively discusses the effects of the operating pressure on the costs of heat exchangers. The analysis employs a conceptual engineering approach, revealing that higher intake pressure reduces overall compressor/expander size, leading to cost savings. Additionally, increasing the number of compression stages for higher storage pressures enhances exergy storage cost-effectiveness. To establish an advanced adiabatic CAES plant with a storage pressure of 200 bar instead of 50 bar, there is potential for a 6 % reduction in $/kW expenditure.</p

How pressure affects costs of power conversion machinery in compressed air energy storage; part II:Heat exchangers

In the field of compressed air energy storage, a critical economic aspect that has been overlooked in existing literature relates to the influence of storage pressure on the capital cost of power conversion system. In Part I, a comprehensive study was conducted to address this question focusing on compressors and expanders. This part is devoted to the heat exchangers and basically assesses the engineering rationale behind the relationship between the cost per kW for HXs and operating pressure. Based on the performed analysis, the operating pressure of a HX impacts two crucial cost-related factors: the heat transfer area and required tube thicknesses. Higher operating pressures are associated with the smaller heat transfer area tending to lower costs, but increasing pressure raises tube thickness requirements, tending to increase costs. Below approximately 200 bar, the former effect prevails over the latter, leading to cost reductions with rising pressure. Conversely, at higher pressures, the latter effect outweighs the former, resulting in cost increases with increasing pressure. On the other hand, as the number of compression stages is increased to attain higher storage pressures, there is a noteworthy variation in the cost contribution of HXs. Specifically, the contribution of HX costs within the PCS machinery escalates from 10 % at a storage pressure of 30 bar to approximately 35% at a storage pressure of 350bar. This cost increase is accompanied by a substantial reduction in costs associated with other PCS machinery components (compressors and expanders), ultimately justifying the advantages of operating at higher storage pressures.</p

How pressure affects costs of power conversion machinery in compressed air energy storage; Part I:Compressors and expanders

This study addresses a critical economic aspect in compressed air energy storage that has not been discussed much in existing literature: the impact of operating pressure on machinery capital cots. It aims to answer whether the cost per unit of power for power conversion systems changes with the maximum storage pressure. Considering that higher storage pressures are associated with greater energy density, enhanced energy storage capabilities and improved system efficiency. This paper helps clarify uncertainties in initial cost estimations for power-generation plants. Effects of operating pressure on the components and overall sizes and consequently costs of power conversion machinery are individually investigated in two parts. Part I encompasses the compressor and expanders, and part II comprehensively discusses the effects of the operating pressure on the costs of heat exchangers. The analysis employs a conceptual engineering approach, revealing that higher intake pressure reduces overall compressor/expander size, leading to cost savings. Additionally, increasing the number of compression stages for higher storage pressures enhances exergy storage cost-effectiveness. To establish an advanced adiabatic CAES plant with a storage pressure of 200 bar instead of 50 bar, there is potential for a 6 % reduction in $/kW expenditure.</p

Improving the performance of a shell and tube latent heat thermal energy storage through modifications of heat transfer pipes:A comprehensive investigation on various configurations

The modification of the geometric configurations of heat transfer pipes in shell and tube Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage (LHTES) systems not only enhances the melting process of the phase change material (PCM) but also improves the overall performance of these systems. This study aims to investigate ways to enhance the performance of LHTES systems by employing heat transfer pipes with various fin and twisted tape arrangements in a horizontal orientation. The Finite Volume Method and Enthalpy-Porosity method are employed to simulate the melting process. Stearic acid is used as the PCM material, while water serves as the heat transfer fluid. Eight different geometric configurations are modelled in the LHTES system: base case, horizontal fins, vertical fins, helical fins, horizontal tape, vertical tape, twisted tape and helical fins with twisted tape. The results show that within the time range of 0 and 29 min, the combined configuration of helical fins with twisted tape consistently demonstrates the fastest melting process. After 29 min, the configuration with vertical fins exhibits a marginally faster melting process than the combined configuration of helical fins with twisted tape. The configurations involving tapes also contribute to accelerated melting, although to a lesser extent than those with fins. Particularly, twisted tape proves highly effective in facilitating faster melting. The complete melting process times for configurations with vertical fins, helical fins, and combined helical fins with twisted tape are 38.7 %, 23.5 % and 32.7 % faster compared to the base case which is ∼69 min. Among the configurations, using tapes results in higher flow resistance and surface area compared to the base case. The attractive features of these configurations make them ideal for creating efficient and space-saving energy storage systems. This study provides crucial insights into essential heat and mass transfer processes, which can be leveraged to develop advanced LHTES systems for enhanced performance and sustainable energy solutions.</p

How pressure affects costs of power conversion machinery in compressed air energy storage; part II: Heat exchangers

In the field of compressed air energy storage, a critical economic aspect that has been overlooked in existing literature relates to the influence of storage pressure on the capital cost of power conversion system. In Part I, a comprehensive study was conducted to address this question focusing on compressors and expanders. This part is devoted to the heat exchangers and basically assesses the engineering rationale behind the relationship between the cost per kW for HXs and operating pressure. Based on the performed analysis, the operating pressure of a HX impacts two crucial cost-related factors: the heat transfer area and required tube thicknesses. Higher operating pressures are associated with the smaller heat transfer area tending to lower costs, but increasing pressure raises tube thickness requirements, tending to increase costs. Below approximately 200 bar, the former effect prevails over the latter, leading to cost reductions with rising pressure. Conversely, at higher pressures, the latter effect outweighs the former, resulting in cost increases with increasing pressure. On the other hand, as the number of compression stages is increased to attain higher storage pressures, there is a noteworthy variation in the cost contribution of HXs. Specifically, the contribution of HX costs within the PCS machinery escalates from 10% at a storage pressure of 30 bar to approximately 35% at a storage pressure of 350 bar. This cost increase is accompanied by a substantial reduction in costs associated with other PCS machinery components (compressors and expanders), ultimately justifying the advantages of operating at higher storage pressures

How pressure affects costs of power conversion machinery in compressed air energy storage; Part I: Compressors and expanders

This study addresses a critical economic aspect in compressed air energy storage that has not been discussed much in existing literature: the impact of operating pressure on machinery capital cots. It aims to answer whether the cost per unit of power for power conversion systems changes with the maximum storage pressure. Considering that higher storage pressures are associated with greater energy density, enhanced energy storage capabilities and improved system efficiency. This paper helps clarify uncertainties in initial cost estimations for power-generation plants. Effects of operating pressure on the components and overall sizes and consequently costs of power conversion machinery are individually investigated in two parts. Part I encompasses the compressor and expanders, and part II comprehensively discusses the effects of the operating pressure on the costs of heat exchangers. The analysis employs a conceptual engineering approach, revealing that higher intake pressure reduces overall compressor/expander size, leading to cost savings. Additionally, increasing the number of compression stages for higher storage pressures enhances exergy storage cost-effectiveness. To establish an advanced adiabatic CAES plant with a storage pressure of 200 bar instead of 50 bar, there is potential for a 6 % reduction in $/kW expenditure

Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage system performance with application-oriented designed axial-flow compressor

Medium and long-duration energy storage systems are expected to play a critical role in the transition towards electrical grids powered by renewable energy sources. ACAES is a promising solution, capable of handling power and energy ratings over hundreds of MW and MWh, respectively. One challenge with ACAES is achieving the required highly efficient operation in the compressor over the range of conditions encountered in the system as the pressure in the air store changes. In this paper, an application-oriented axial-flow compressor is designed, aiming towards efficient operation throughout the operation range, whilst also associating the performance prediction to a practical compressor geometry. A two-step design methodology based on inviscid, axisymmetric flow conditions has been implemented, leading to the flowtrack, blade-row geometries and the compressor performance map. The compressor model is integrated into an ACAES model, including two compression spools, two expansion stages with preheat, a constant volume high pressure storage operating between 5.5 and 7.7 MPa and two separate Thermal Energy Storage units. While the existing ACAES literature either ignores the transient off-design operation or uses generic numerical correlations (which are not associated to a particular geometry), the key novelty of this paper is the application of a detailed design method for turbomachinery to ACAES. The results indicate that the designed compressor requires 33 stages over the two spools, and is able to operate efficiently over the storage pressure range, showing that if the application-oriented design procedure is applied to the compressor, it does not stop ACAES reaching 70% round-trip efficiency, outputting 35MW for approximately 15 h. Importantly, the specific ACAES requirement of conserving heat at higher temperatures has been fulfilled by decreasing the number of intercoolers. Finally, it is recommended that a similar level of scrutiny is applied to the other components (i.e. expanders, heat exchangers and TES units), keeping in mind the unique set of operational requirements of ACAES. This work is an important step towards removing the common misconception that off-the-shelf components can be easily be used in typical ACAES designs.</p

Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage system performance with application-oriented designed axial-flow compressor

Medium and long-duration energy storage systems are expected to play a critical role in the transition towards electrical grids powered by renewable energy sources. ACAES is a promising solution, capable of handling power and energy ratings over hundreds of MW and MWh, respectively. One challenge with ACAES is achieving the required highly efficient operation in the compressor over the range of conditions encountered in the system as the pressure in the air store changes. In this paper, an application-oriented axial-flow compressor is designed, aiming towards efficient operation throughout the operation range, whilst also associating the performance prediction to a practical compressor geometry. A two-step design methodology based on inviscid, axisymmetric flow conditions has been implemented, leading to the flowtrack, blade-row geometries and the compressor performance map. The compressor model is integrated into an ACAES model, including two compression spools, two expansion stages with preheat, a constant volume high pressure storage operating between 5.5 and 7.7 MPa and two separate Thermal Energy Storage units. While the existing ACAES literature either ignores the transient off-design operation or uses generic numerical correlations (which are not associated to a particular geometry), the key novelty of this paper is the application of a detailed design method for turbomachinery to ACAES. The results indicate that the designed compressor requires 33 stages over the two spools, and is able to operate efficiently over the storage pressure range, showing that if the application-oriented design procedure is applied to the compressor, it does not stop ACAES reaching 70% round-trip efficiency, outputting 35MW for approximately 15 h. Importantly, the specific ACAES requirement of conserving heat at higher temperatures has been fulfilled by decreasing the number of intercoolers. Finally, it is recommended that a similar level of scrutiny is applied to the other components (i.e. expanders, heat exchangers and TES units), keeping in mind the unique set of operational requirements of ACAES. This work is an important step towards removing the common misconception that off-the-shelf components can be easily be used in typical ACAES designs.</p

Effectiveness of Screening and Treatment Approaches for Schistosomiasis and Strongyloidiasis in Newly-Arrived Migrants from Endemic Countries in the EU/EEA: A Systematic Review

We aimed to evaluate the evidence on screening and treatment for two parasitic infections—schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis—among migrants from endemic countries arriving in the European Union and European Economic Area (EU/EEA). We conducted a systematic search of multiple databases to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 1 January 1993 and 30 May 2016 presenting evidence on diagnostic and treatment efficacy and cost-effectiveness. We conducted additional systematic search for individual studies published between 2010 and 2017. We assessed the methodological quality of reviews and studies using the AMSTAR, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and QUADAS-II tools. Study synthesis and assessment of the certainty of the evidence was performed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. We included 28 systematic reviews and individual studies in this review. The GRADE certainty of evidence was low for the effectiveness of screening techniques and moderate to high for treatment efficacy. Antibody-detecting serological tests are the most effective screening tests for detection of both schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis in low-endemicity settings, because they have higher sensitivity than conventional parasitological methods. Short courses of praziquantel and ivermectin were safe and highly effective and cost-effective in treating schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis, respectively. Economic modelling suggests presumptive single-dose treatment of strongyloidiasis with ivermectin for all migrants is likely cost-effective, but feasibility of this strategy has yet to be demonstrated in clinical studies. The evidence supports screening and treatment for schistosomiasis and strongyloidiasis in migrants from endemic countries, to reduce morbidity and mortality