Treatable traits in advanced emphysema patients eligible for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced emphysema eligible for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) using endobronchial valves (EBV) are characterized by severe static lung hyperinflation, which can be considered a treatable trait. Other treatable traits (TTs), which are assumed to be present in this highly selected patient group, have not been studied in detail nor how they may affect health-related quality of life (HRQL).AIMS: We aimed to evaluate a spectrum of TTs in COPD patients eligible for EBV treatment and their association with HRQL.METHODS: The SoLVE study (NCT03474471) was a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to examine the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients receiving EBV. The presence/absence of 16 TTs was based on pre-defined thresholds. HRQL was assessed with the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Subjects were stratified into two groups, using the median split method, into higher or lower SGRQ total score. Logistic regression assessed the odds ratio (OR) of having a higher SGRQ total score per TT.RESULTS: Ninety-seven subjects were included, the mean number of TTs per patient was 8.1 ± 2.5. Low physical activity (95%), poor exercise capacity (94%) and severe fatigue (75%) were the most prevalent TTs. The sum of TTs present in a subject was associated with the SGRQ total score (r = 0.53; p &lt; 0.001). Severe fatigue, depression, and anxiety were predictors of having a higher SGRQ total score.CONCLUSIONS: A high prevalence and co-occurrence of multiple TTs were identified in emphysema patients eligible for EBV. Patients with a higher number of TTs were more likely to have worse HRQL.</p

Differential Response to 12 Weeks of Once-Daily Tiotropium/Olodaterol Fixed Dose Combination in Patients with COPD:A Multidimensional Response Profiling in the TORRACTO Study

Purpose: Long-acting bronchodilators (LABD), in general, reduce respiratory symptoms, improve exercise endurance time and pulmonary function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there might be heterogeneity in improvement for several outcomes on an individual level. Therefore, we aimed to profile the multidimensional response in patients receiving tiotropium/olodaterol (T/O) using self-organizing maps (SOM).Materials and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the TORRACTO study: a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the effects of T/O (2.5/5 and 5/5 mu g) compared with placebo after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment in patients with COPD. In the current study, we used endurance time, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), inspiratory capacity (IC) at rest and IC at isotime (ICiso) to identify clusters by means of SOM in patients treated with T/O.Results: Six clusters with distinct response profiles were generated at week 12 in COPD patients receiving T/O (n = 268). Patients in cluster 1 improved significantly on all outcomes, whilst cluster 5 showed strong improvement in endurance time (357s); contrarily, FEV1, FVC, ICrest and ICiso decreased when compared to baseline.Conclusion: Individual responses on endurance time and pulmonary function after 12 weeks of T/O are heterogeneous. This study identified clusters in COPD patients with markedly different multidimensional response on LABD

Impact and timing of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients undergoing bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves:A multicentre randomized controlled trial in patients with severe emphysema

Background and Objective: Both bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves (BLVR-EBV) and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) are effective treatments for improving exercise capacity and patient-reported outcomes in patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). According to current recommendations, all BLVR-EBV patients should have undergone PR first. Our aim was to study the effects of PR both before and after BLVR-EBV compared to BLVR-EBV alone.Methods: We included patients with severe COPD who were eligible for BLVR-EBV and PR. Participants were randomized into three groups: PR before BLVR-EBV, PR after BLVR-EBV or BLVR-EBV without PR. The primary outcome was change in constant work rate cycle test (CWRT) endurance time at 6-month follow-up of the PR groups compared to BLVR-EBV alone. Secondary endpoints included changes in 6-minute walking test, daily step count, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life.Results: Ninety-seven participants were included. At 6-month follow-up, there was no difference in change in CWRT endurance time between the PR before BLVR-EBV and BLVR-EBV alone groups (median: 421 [IQR: 44; 1304] vs. 787 [123; 1024] seconds, p = 0.82) or in any of the secondary endpoints, but the PR after BLVR-EBV group exhibited a smaller improvement in CWRT endurance time (median: 107 [IQR: 2; 573], p = 0.04) and health-related quality of life compared to BLVR-EBV alone.Conclusion: The addition of PR to BLVR-EBV did not result in increased exercise capacity, daily step count or improved patient-reported outcomes compared to BLVR-EBV alone, neither when PR was administered before BLVR-EBV nor when PR was administered after BLVR-EBV.</p