A Scoping Review on the Effects of Kinesio Taping on Oropharyngeal Function Related to Swallowing and Feeding

Following the expansion of interdisciplinary communication among rehabilitative service providers, new techniques have been introduced for treating swallowing disorders. Kinesio taping (KT) is one of the recently noticed techniques in the rehabilitation of swallowing and feeding disorders. Given the novelty of this technique in research and practice, the present scoping review aimed to summarize the available evidence on the effects of KT on the oropharyngeal function related to swallowing, and to identify current knowledge gaps to guide future studies. The initial comprehensive search was conducted in the six databases in November 2022 and then was updated in June 2023. Studies were independently reviewed by two authors to exclude all types of reviews and study protocols, studies published only in an abstract form and also studies that used KT for improving voice and dysarthria symptoms. The methodology of the included studies was also critically appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) standard tools by two authors. The results of the studies were categorized and reported based on their overall objectives. In final analysis, 21 articles were described. Study designs ranged from randomized control trials (RCTs) to the case reports. The effects of KT had been investigated on drooling, oral feeding skills of infants, immediate activation of swallowing muscles, and management of dysphagia in patients with stroke or cerebral palsy (CP). Although innovative approaches to use KT as a therapeutic method in swallowing disorders have been investigated in the studies, there are many methodological limitations that affected validity of the results. In general, it seems there is not enough evidence to add KT to the usual management of feeding and swallowing disorders yet. Further studies, therefore, are required to achieve more accurate conclusions in each of the objectives summarized in this study

The effects of swallowing exercise and non-nutritive sucking exercise on oral feeding readiness in preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial

Introduction: Preterm infants demonstrate problems with pharyngeal swallowing in addition to sucking problems. Oral motor intervention and nonnutritive sucking (NNS) were introduced for promoting oral feeding skills in preterm infants. NNS cannot cover all the components of oral feeding. In another hand, the swallowing exercise (SE) can accelerate the attainment of independent oral feeding in the preterm infants. The current study sought to examine if a combined program of NNS and SE compared with a program that only involves NNS would be more effective on oral feeding readiness of premature infants. Material and methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). 45 preterm infants were recruited in three groups. In the group I, infants were provided with NNS twice a day. The group II received a program that involved 15 min of NNS and 15 min of SE, daily. Both interventions were provided 10 days during two consecutive weeks. The group III, control group, just received the routine NICU care. All infants were assessed by functional oral feeding outcome measures including postmenstrual age (PMA) at the start of oral feeding, PMA at full oral feeding, transition time (days from start to full oral feeding), PMA at discharge time and also the infant's dependency on tube-feeding at discharge time after interventions. Also, all infants were assessed via Preterm Oral Feeding Readiness Scale (POFRAS) before and after intervention. Results: No significant differences were observed in the PMA mean at start of oral-feeding (P = 0.29), full oralfeeding (P = 0.13), discharge time (P = 0.45) and the mean of transition time (P = 0.14). Compared to the control group, more infants in the group II were discharged without tube-feeding (P = 0.01). The mean of POFRAS was significantly higher in both groups I and II compared to the group III (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively). This score was, however, not statistically different between the groups I and II (P = 0.98). Conclusions: Both studied interventions were superior to routine NICU care in enhancing the oral feeding readiness of preterm infants based on the POFRAS score. The studied combined program of NNS and SE, and not NNS program, could significantly increase the number of discharged infants without tube-feeding compared to control group