191 research outputs found
Interaction Techniques using Head Mounted Displays and Handheld Devices for Outdoor Augmented Reality
Depending upon their nature, Outdoor AR applications can be deployed on head mounted displays (HMD) like Google glass or handheld Displays (HHD) like smartphones. This masterβs thesis investigates novel gesture-based interaction techniques and applications for a HMD-HHD hybrid system that account for advantages presented by each platform. Prior research in HMD-HHD hybrid systems and gestures used in VR and surface computing were taken into account while designing the applications and interaction techniques. A prototype system combining a HMD and HHD was developed and four applications were created for the system. For evaluating the gestures, an application that compared four of the proposed gestures for selection tasks was developed. The results showed a significant difference between the different gestures and that the choice of gesture for selection tasks using a hybrid system depended upon application requirements like speed and accuracy
ΠΠ½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ
ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΎΡΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡ ΡΠ΅Π³Π»Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΡΠΌ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ³ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ, Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ. Π‘ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. Π Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠΌ Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ. Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ²
Usability Assessment of a Powered Wheelchair Controller: How Impairments Affect Human Computer Interaction Based Tasks
Problem: Designing the user experience is a growing trend in product design; however this
trend has not greatly benefited people with impairments and disabilities. There are no practical
tools to broadly assist with this issue. There is a need for standardized measures to quantify
impairment, a model to predict how designs may perform and a need for data regarding how
people with impairments interact with consumer technology.
Purpose: To conduct a usability analysis with an industry partner on their powered wheelchair
controller using participants with varying impairments. The industry partner was seeking
better insight into the benefits of formal user testing.
Method: Forty consenting adults were given a score representing their level of impairment
using six measures from the International Classification of Functioning (ICF). These measures
were identified by the researcher to affect interaction with a device. Performance was
measured by time taken to complete tasks, errors made, reported task difficulty and reported
controller usability.
Results: Performance was reduced in participants with a higher ICF score and age. An ICF score
less than or equal to 2 was 117 times more likely to not complete the tasks, greater than or
equal to 3 was not able to complete the experiment. Age >50 years took an average 79 seconds
longer than <35 years to complete a task and reported greater difficulty, more errors and a
lower usability for the controller.
Implications: Low to moderate levels of impairment has a significantly negative effect on the
usability of common devices. Difficulties were mostly cognitive with participants unable to
create an accurate mental model of the system. Participants with lower performance tended to
be overly optimistic about their abilities. Mistakes were the greatest source of error followed by
lapses and almost no reported or observed slip errors.
Original Contribution: The ICF has never been used as a metric for usability testing. This study
successfully applied the ICF alongside other measures to prove its validity. Based on the results
and current literature the Task Process Model was created to provide a simple and practical
way to describe the interaction of people completing a task of basic to moderate complexity
The biological sewage disposal in local treatment facilities of objects of individual residential buildings
Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈ Ρ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ-Π±ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ². Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π° ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π² Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
"ΠΠΠ‘" ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΉ Π·Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΠΊΠΈ. ΠΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΠΠ‘ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ "Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ" ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΠΠ‘ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π·Π°Π»ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ "Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°" ΡΠ±ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ Π±ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ΄, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
Π’Π΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π°ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²
ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΠ² Π³ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈ Ρ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Ρ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π‘ΠΈΠΌΡ
Π° ΠΈ ΠΠΎΠΉΠ΅ΡΠ°. ΠΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ
ΠΡΠ±ΠΎΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²
ΠΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΠΊΠ°Ρ'ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΊΡ Π±Π°Π·Π°Π»ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ»Π° Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΡΠ΄Π½ΡΡΡΡ Ρ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Ρ ΡΡΠ·Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡΡΡ Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΡΠΊΠΈ, Π΄Π»Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ². Π£ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡΠ², Π²ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΡΠΊΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΉΠ½ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΏΠ½Ρ: Π΄ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ, Π΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΡΡΠ² Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΡΠ² ΠΌΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°, ΡΠΎΠ·ΠΌΡΡ ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΡΠΆ Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΊΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΡΡΠΊΠ°, ΡΠΎ Π·Π°Π²Π°Π½ΡΠ°ΠΆΡΡΡΡΡΡ Π² Π΄ΡΠΎΠ±Π°ΡΠΊΡ ΡΠ° ΡΡΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°Π»Ρ. ΠΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π· ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠΎΡ Π»Π°Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΊΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ, Π° ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½Ρ Π² ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠ·Π°Π³Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ.ΠΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈ Π±Π°Π·Π°Π»ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ»Π° Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π² Π΄Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ, Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ². Π ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΠΊΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅: Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ, Π΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡ, ΡΠ°Π·ΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²Π°Π»ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ, ΠΊΡΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π·Π°Π³ΡΡΠΆΠ°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π² Π΄ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠ»ΠΊΡ ΠΊΡΡΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π΄ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π°. ΠΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠ· Π²ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·Π±ΡΠ°Π½ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ, Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°
An isotopic and anionic study of the hydrologic connectivity between the Waimakariri River and the Avon River, Christchurch, New Zealand
The Waimakariri-Avon River system is an important component of the Christchurch aquifer
system and has been identified as one of, if not the, primary groundwater flow path. The
Waimakariri-Avon River system is ideally suited to geochemical tracing of surface water-
groundwater interaction and while many past studies have been undertaken to characterise
this system, in terms of its geochemistry and physical hydrogeological components, there is
still a large amount of uncertainty as to how long it takes for groundwater to flow from the
Waimakariri River, through the Waimakariri-Avon River groundwater system, to the springs
that feed the Avon River. The primary goals of this thesis were to;
1) Constrain the residence time of groundwater connecting the Waimakariri-Avon River
groundwater system using stable oxygen and hydrogen isotopes and analysis of anionic
concentrations of: chloride, fluoride, nitrate, nitrite, bromide and sulfate,
2) Provide additional evidence of a hydrological connection between the Waimakariri River
and the Avon River systems,
3) Present observations of the stable isotopic and anionic response of surface water to
rainfall events,
4) Identify stable isotopic and anionic surface water variation along the Waimakariri-Avon
River system, and establish the reasons for these.
This study presents the use of natural isotopic and anionic tracers to characterise the
residence time of the groundwater that flows between the Waimakariri and Avon Rivers, by
sampling surface water and meteoric water at sites that are part of the Waimakariri-Avon
River system. 375 samples were collected from 10 surface water and 4 rainwater sites
distributed across the Waimakariri-Avon River surface water-groundwater flow path
between March 5th and August, 2014. Additionally the study provides further stable isotopic
evidence of the connection between the Waimakariri and Avon Rivers, as well as presents
the variability of surface water chemistry in response to rainfall events. Identification of isotopic and anionic variation along the Waimakariri-Avon River system, by surface water
sampling, was also conducted to establish the probable causes of observed variations.
This study found that the use of large rainfall events, as natural tracers, was not conclusive
in establishing the groundwater residence time of the Waimakariri-Avon River system within
the 4.5 month sampling period available. Surface water sampling provided further evidence
in support of past studies that have determined an isotopic connection between the
Waimakariri River and the Avon River with mean stable isotopic values for the Waimakariri
River (-8.85β° Ξ΄18O and-60.65 Ξ΄D) and Avon River (-8.53β° Ξ΄18O and -58.72 Ξ΄D) being more
similar than those of locally derived meteoric water (-5.48β° Ξ΄18O and -35.13 Ξ΄D).
Observations of surface water chemistry variations thorough time determined and
identified clear responses to rainfall events as deviations from baseline values, coinciding
with rainfall events. Isotopic variation along the Waimakariri-Avon River system was shown
to reflect Waimakariri River derived shallow groundwater with the contributions from
rainwater increasing with increased proximity to the Avon River mouth.
Anionic profiling of the Waimakariri-Avon River system identified increasing concentrations
of chloride, nitrate, sulfate, nitrite and bromide, relative to the Waimakariri River, with
increased proximity to the Avon River mouth. Fluoride concentrations were identified in
lower concentration, relative to the Waimakariri River, with increased proximity to the Avon
River mouth. Fluoride and nitrite concentrations were attributed predominantly, if not
entirely, to an atmospheric source as mean concentrations were greater in meteoric waters
by a factor of at least 2, compared to surface water samples. Chloride and bromide have
been attributed to possible salt water mixing as a result of the interaction of upwelling
deeper groundwater with the marine and estuarine sands beneath the upper unconfined
aquifer, that act as a confining layer within the Christchurch aquifer system. Nitrate and
sulfate concentrations have been attributed to potential fertilizer usage and past land-use
impacts.
A significant step-change increase in chloride, bromide, nitrate and sulfate concentrations
was observed between the surface water sample sites at Avonhead Park and the University
of Canterbury. The step-change coincides with the boundary of the upper confining layer
within the Christchurch aquifer system, and explains the increases in chloride and bromide concentrations. It also suggests a widely distributed source area as concentrations do not
become diluted at the Avon River site, at Hagley Park, , which would be expected from the
addition of other tributaries, if they did not have similarly high chloride and bromide
concentrations. The area between these two sites has also been identified by Environment
Canterbury as potentially impacted by past agricultural land-use practices and may explain
the increases in nitrate and sulfate concentrations
Smoke Alarm Ownership in Relation to Socio-Economic Factors
This study focuses on smoke alarm ownership within Christchurch. Two different areas were selected, based on income levels. These two areas, Holmwood and Avon Loop, were then compared to determine if socio-economic factors impact on smoke alarm ownership. This study focused primarily on the relationships between smoke alarm ownership and location, income, education, and home ownership. Other topics discussed include the number of alarms per household, escape plans, people who smoke in the household, heating methods, reasons for non-purchase and other specific relationships that were uncovered during the study. The results between the two areas are significant for various reasons explained in this study
- β¦