Comparison of a Chinese Herbal Medicine (CCH1) and Lactulose as First-Line Treatment of Constipation in Long-Term Care: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, and Placebo-Controlled Trial

Many institutionalized patients and their healthcare providers are dissatisfied with current laxative therapy. This study compared therapeutic efficacy, safety, and laxative cost of an herbal formula (CCH1) and lactulose for long stay patients with constipation. In this double-blind, double-dummy, and placebo-controlled trial, we randomized 93 residents with chronic constipation from two long-term care facilities in Taiwan to receive either CCH1 with lactulose placebo or CCH1 placebo with lactulose for 8 weeks, then followed up for 4 weeks without study medication. Both treatments were effective and well tolerated for patients, but CCH1 produced more spontaneous bowel movements, less rectal treatments, less amount of rescue laxative, and lower laxative cost than lactulose during treatment. No significant differences were found in stool consistency, stool amount, global assessment, and safety concerns. In conclusion, our results suggest that CCH1 may have better efficacy and could be used as an alternative option to lactulose in the treatment of constipation in long-term care

Comparison of Genotoxicity and Pulmonary Toxicity Study of Modified SiO₂ Nanomaterials

Surface-modified nano-SiO2 is a common additive in many products. However, the safety of nano-SiO2 products under various modifications is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the genotoxicity and acute pulmonary toxicity of nano-SiO2 with or without modification. The samples used in this study included: sample A (SA, 55.16 nm, 411.3 mg/mL), modified sample A (mSA, 82.29 nm, 37.7 mg/mL), sample B (SB, 22 nm, 358.0 mg/mL), and modified sample B (mSB, 86.64 nm, 37.7 mg/mL). In the genotoxicity study, we conducted an Ames test, chromosomal aberration test (CA), and a micronucleus (MN) test. The SA, mSA, and mSB groups showed negative results in all these genotoxicity tests. Only SB showed a weakly positive reaction in these assays, but the genotoxicity could be reversed after S9 metabolism or modification. In the acute pulmonary toxicity test, the rats were given an intratracheal instillation (IT) (0.5 mL/kg) of diluted samples and sacrificed after 1 or 14 days. The mortality rate, number of leukocytes and cytokines of TNF-α in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and the pathology in the lungs were determined. The results revealed that mSA posed acute toxicity in rats. After modification, the pulmonary toxicity was increased in mSA but decreased in mSB on Day 1, and no significant difference was observed on Day 14. In conclusion, there was no observed genotoxicity in either SA or SB, while mSA posed acute inhalation toxicity to rats that decreased in mSB after modification. This indicates that the decrease in pH level in SA and decrease in the solid content in SB are considered after the trifluorosilane surface-modified amorphous nano-silica

Comparison of Genotoxicity and Pulmonary Toxicity Study of Modified SiO2 Nanomaterials

Surface-modified nano-SiO2 is a common additive in many products. However, the safety of nano-SiO2 products under various modifications is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the genotoxicity and acute pulmonary toxicity of nano-SiO2 with or without modification. The samples used in this study included: sample A (SA, 55.16 nm, 411.3 mg/mL), modified sample A (mSA, 82.29 nm, 37.7 mg/mL), sample B (SB, 22 nm, 358.0 mg/mL), and modified sample B (mSB, 86.64 nm, 37.7 mg/mL). In the genotoxicity study, we conducted an Ames test, chromosomal aberration test (CA), and a micronucleus (MN) test. The SA, mSA, and mSB groups showed negative results in all these genotoxicity tests. Only SB showed a weakly positive reaction in these assays, but the genotoxicity could be reversed after S9 metabolism or modification. In the acute pulmonary toxicity test, the rats were given an intratracheal instillation (IT) (0.5 mL/kg) of diluted samples and sacrificed after 1 or 14 days. The mortality rate, number of leukocytes and cytokines of TNF-α in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and the pathology in the lungs were determined. The results revealed that mSA posed acute toxicity in rats. After modification, the pulmonary toxicity was increased in mSA but decreased in mSB on Day 1, and no significant difference was observed on Day 14. In conclusion, there was no observed genotoxicity in either SA or SB, while mSA posed acute inhalation toxicity to rats that decreased in mSB after modification. This indicates that the decrease in pH level in SA and decrease in the solid content in SB are considered after the trifluorosilane surface-modified amorphous nano-silica

Sheep as a large animal model for hearing research: comparison to common laboratory animals and humans

Abstract Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), caused by pathology in the cochlea, is the most common type of hearing loss in humans. It is generally irreversible with very few effective pharmacological treatments available to prevent the degenerative changes or minimise the impact. Part of this has been attributed to difficulty of translating “proof-of-concept” for novel treatments established in small animal models to human therapies. There is an increasing interest in the use of sheep as a large animal model. In this article, we review the small and large animal models used in pre-clinical hearing research such as mice, rats, chinchilla, guinea pig, rabbit, cat, monkey, dog, pig, and sheep to humans, and compare the physiology, inner ear anatomy, and some of their use as model systems for SNHL, including cochlear implantation surgeries. Sheep have similar cochlear anatomy, auditory threshold, neonatal auditory system development, adult and infant body size, and number of birth as humans. Based on these comparisons, we suggest that sheep are well-suited as a potential translational animal model that bridges the gap between rodent model research to the clinical use in humans. This is especially in areas looking at changes across the life-course or in specific areas of experimental investigation such as cochlear implantation and other surgical procedures, biomedical device development and age-related sensorineural hearing loss research. Combined use of small animals for research that require higher throughput and genetic modification and large animals for medical translation could greatly accelerate the overall translation of basic research in the field of auditory neuroscience from bench to clinic