Predicting Vertical Ground Reaction Forces in Running from the Sound of Footsteps

From the point of view of measurement, footstep sounds represent a simple, wearable and inexpensive sensing opportunity to assess running biomechanical parameters. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the sounds of footsteps can be used to predict the vertical ground reaction force profiles during running. Thirty-seven recreational runners performed overground running, and their sounds of footsteps were recorded from four microphones, while the vertical ground reaction force was recorded using a force plate. We generated nine different combinations of microphone data, ranging from individual recordings up to all four microphones combined. We trained machine learning models using these microphone combinations and predicted the ground reaction force profiles by a leave-one-out approach on the subject level. There were no significant differences in the prediction accuracy between the different microphone combinations (p < 0.05). Moreover, the machine learning model was able to predict the ground reaction force profiles with a mean Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.99 (range 0.79–0.999), mean relative root-mean-square error of 9.96% (range 2–23%) and mean accuracy to define rearfoot or forefoot strike of 77%. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of using the sounds of footsteps in combination with machine learning algorithms based on Fourier transforms to predict the ground reaction force curves. The results are encouraging in terms of the opportunity to create wearable technology to assess the ground reaction force profiles for runners in the interests of injury prevention and performance optimization

Prediction of instantaneous perceived effort during outdoor running using accelerometry and machine learning

The rate of perceived effort (RPE) is a subjective scale widely used for defining training loads. However, the subjective nature of the metric might lead to an inaccurate representation of the imposed metabolic/mechanical exercise demands. Therefore, this study aimed to predict the rate of perceived exertions during running using biomechanical parameters extracted from a commercially available running smartwatch. Forty-three recreational runners performed a simulated 5-km race on a track, providing their RPE from a Borg scale (6-20) every 400 m. Running distance, heart rate, foot contact time, cadence, stride length, and vertical oscillation were extracted from a running smartwatch (Garmin 735XT). Machine learning regression models were trained to predict the RPE at every 5 s of the 5-km race using subject-independent (leave-one-out), as well as a subject-dependent regression method. The subject-dependent method was tested using 5%, 10%, or 20% of the runner's data in the training set while using the remaining data for testing. The average root-mean-square error (RMSE) in predicting the RPE using the subject-independent method was 1.8 ± 0.8 RPE points (range 0.6-4.1; relative RMSE ~ 12 ± 6%) across the entire 5-km race. However, the error from subject-dependent models was reduced to 1.00 ± 0.31, 0.66 ± 0.20 and 0.45 ± 0.13 RPE points when using 5%, 10%, and 20% of data for training, respectively (average relative RMSE &lt; 7%). All types of predictions underestimated the maximal RPE in ~ 1 RPE point. These results suggest that the data accessible from commercial smartwatches can be used to predict perceived exertion, opening new venues to improve training workload monitoring.</p