4 research outputs found

    Complexed prostate-specific antigen, complexed prostate-specific antigen density of total and transition zone, complexed/total prostate-specific antigen ratio, free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio, density of total and transition zone prostate-specific antigen: Results of the prospective multicenter European trial

    No full text
    This prospective, multicenter European Prostate Cancer Detection study evaluated the value and performance of the molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and their derivatives in combination with prostate gland and transition zone volumes in early detection of prostate cancer in patients with PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL. Of 750 men enrolled at 7 different European urology centers into the study between November 2001 and March 2002, 340 (45.3%) had a total PSA (tPSA) between 4 and 10 ng/mL (age range, 46 to 87 years). In all patients, the ratio of complexed PSA (cPSA) to tPSA (c/tPSA), cPSA density (cPSAD), cPSAD of the transition zone, PSA, free PSA (fPSA), ratio of fPSA to tPSA (f/tPSA), tPSA density (PSAD), and PSAD of the transition zone were measured and collected 5 to 10 minutes before the sextant biopsy with 2 additional transition zone cores. Measurements of tPSA and fPSA were done with the AxSYM test, whereas cPSA was measured with the ACS 180 cPSA assay. All patients had a transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant prostate biopsy, and 2 additional transition zone biopsies and total and transition zone volumes were measured at the time of biopsy. Histopathologic findings revealed benign histology in 237 patients and prostate cancer in 103 patients (69.7% and 30.3%, respectively). Statistically significant differences included larger total volumes, larger transition zone volumes, and f/tPSA in patients with benign disease (P = 0.0009, P <0.0001, P <0.0001, respectively). At 90% and 95% sensitivity, specificity of cPSA was significantly greater than that for PSA (P <0.0001). At sensitivity levels of 90% and 95%, the specificity of the cPSA assay using cutoff values of 3.06 and 2.52 ng/mL was 20.3% and 9.1%, respectively. A cPSA cutoff value of 6.95 ng/mL and 7.57 ng/mL afforded 90% and 95% specificity for detecting prostate cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristics curve of cPSA was statistically significantly higher compared with tPSA (60.8 vs 56.9, P = 0.032). AUC for volume-related parameters PSAD, cPSAD, PSAD of the transition zone, and cPSAD of the transition zone were 62.8%, 63.1%, 63.0%, and 63.6%, respectively. cPSA performs better than tPSA in the differentiation between benign disease and prostate cancer and provides similar information to the f/tPSA ratio. In addition, cPSA and cPSA volume-related parameters (cPSAD, cPSAD of the transition zone) further improved the specificity of PSA in early detection of prostate cancer. © 2002, Elsevier Science Inc.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: When should we stop?

    No full text
    Purpose: We evaluated biochemical parameters and pathological features, as well as biopsy related morbidity of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 2, 3 and 4 in men with total serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) between 4 and 10 ng./ml. These features were compared to those detected on prostate biopsy 1. Materials and Methods: In this prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study 1,051 men with total PSA between 4 and 10 ng./ml. underwent transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsy and 2 additional transition zone biopsies. All patients in whom biopsy samples were negative for prostate cancer underwent biopsy 2 after 6 weeks. If also negative, biopsies 3 and even 4 were performed at 8-week intervals. Those patients with clinically localized cancer underwent radical prostatectomy. Pathological and clinical features of patients diagnosed with cancer on either biopsy 1 or 2 and clinically organ confined disease who agreed to undergo radical prostatectomy were compared. Results: Cancer detection rates on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 22% (231 of 1,051), 10% (83 of 820), 5% (36 of 737) and 4% (4 of 94), respectively. Overall, of the patients with clinically localized disease, which was 67% of cancers detected, 86% underwent radical prostatectomy and 14% opted for watchful waiting or radiation therapy. Overall, 58.0%, 60.9%, 86.3% and 100% of patients had organ confined disease on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Despite statistically significant differences in regard to multifocality (p=0.009) and cancer location (p=0.001), including cancer on biopsy 2 showing a lower rate of multifocality and a more apico-dorsal location, there were no differences in regard to stage (p=0.2), Gleason score (p=0.3), percent Gleason grade 4/5 (p=0.2), serum PSA and patient age between biopsies 1 and 2. However, cancer detected on biopsies 3 and 4 had a significantly lower Gleason score (p=0.001 and 0.001), lower rate of grade 4/5 (p=0.02), and lower volume (p=0.001 and 0.001) and stage (p=0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Despite differences in location and multifocality, pathological and biochemical features of cancer detected on biopsies 1 and 2 were similar, suggesting comparable biological behaviors. Cancer detected on biopsies 3 and 4 had a lower grade, stage and volume compared with that on biopsies i and 2. Morbidity on biopsies 1 and 2 was similar, whereas biopsies 3 and 4 had a slightly higher complication rate. Therefore, biopsy 2 in all cases of a negative finding on biopsy 1 appears justified. However, biopsies 3 and 4 should only be obtained in select patients with a high suspicion of cancer and/or poor prognostic factors on biopsy 1 or 2.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
    corecore