177 research outputs found
ATP Concentration-Dependent Fractions of One-Head-Bound and Two-Head-Bound States of the Kinesin Motor during Its Chemomechanical Coupling Cycle
Kinesin is a typical motor protein that can use the chemical
energy
of ATP hydrolysis to step processively on microtubules, alternating
between one-head-bound and two-head-bound states. Some published experimental
results showed that the duration of the one-head-bound state increases
greatly with a decrease in ATP concentration, whereas the duration
of the two-head-bound state is independent of ATP concentration, indicating
that ATP binding occurs in the one-head-bound state. On the contrary,
other experimental results showed that the duration of the two-head-bound
state increases greatly with a decrease in ATP concentration, whereas
the duration of the one-head-bound state increases slightly with a
decrease in ATP concentration, indicating that ATP binding occurs
mainly in the two-head-bound state. Here, we explain consistently
and quantitatively these contradictory experimental results, resolving
the controversy that is critical to the chemomechanical coupling mechanism
of the kinesin motor
Dynamics of Forward and Backward Translocation of mRNA in the Ribosome
<div><p>Translocation of the mRNA-tRNA complex in the ribosome, which is catalyzed by elongation factor EF-G, is one of critical steps in the elongation cycle of protein synthesis. Besides this conventional forward translocation, the backward translocation can also occur, which can be catalyzed by elongation factor LepA. However, the molecular mechanism of the translocation remains elusive. To understand the mechanism, here we study theoretically the dynamics of the forward translocation under various nucleotide states of EF-G and the backward translocation in the absence of and in the presence of LepA. We present a consistent explanation of spontaneous forward translocations in the absence of EF-G, the EF-G-catalyzed forward translocations in the presence of a non-hydrolysable GTP analogue and in the presence of GTP, and the spontaneous and LepA-catalyzed backward translocation. The theoretical results provide quantitative explanations of a lot of different, independent experimental data, and also provide testable predictions.</p></div
Summary of energy barriers during forward translocation.
<p>Summary of energy barriers during forward translocation.</p
ATP Concentration-Dependent Fractions of One-Head-Bound and Two-Head-Bound States of the Kinesin Motor during Its Chemomechanical Coupling Cycle
Kinesin is a typical motor protein that can use the chemical
energy
of ATP hydrolysis to step processively on microtubules, alternating
between one-head-bound and two-head-bound states. Some published experimental
results showed that the duration of the one-head-bound state increases
greatly with a decrease in ATP concentration, whereas the duration
of the two-head-bound state is independent of ATP concentration, indicating
that ATP binding occurs in the one-head-bound state. On the contrary,
other experimental results showed that the duration of the two-head-bound
state increases greatly with a decrease in ATP concentration, whereas
the duration of the one-head-bound state increases slightly with a
decrease in ATP concentration, indicating that ATP binding occurs
mainly in the two-head-bound state. Here, we explain consistently
and quantitatively these contradictory experimental results, resolving
the controversy that is critical to the chemomechanical coupling mechanism
of the kinesin motor
Backward translocation.
<p>(a) Schematic of transition from post- (State POST) to pre-translocation state, including the classical non-ratchet state (State NR) and hybrid state (State hybrid). (b) Potential <i>V</i>(<i>x</i>) that characterizes the transition from the pre- to post-translocation state.</p
Results of forward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, which are calculated by using Eq. (5), with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i>β=β23.87 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i>β=β24.24 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> (corresponding to the case in the absence of EF-G).
<p>Results of forward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, which are calculated by using Eq. (5), with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i>β=β23.87 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i>β=β24.24 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> (corresponding to the case in the absence of EF-G).</p
Forward translocation.
<p>(a) Schematic of transition from pre-translocation state, including the classical non-ratchet state (State NR) and hybrid state (State hybrid), to post-translocation state (State POST). (b) Potential <i>V</i>(<i>x</i>) that characterizes the transition from the pre- to post-translocation state.</p
Results of backward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>0</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E</i><sub>0</sub>, which are calculated by Eq. (3) but with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i> being replaced by <i>E</i><sub>0</sub> and <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, respectively. <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>β=β33.91<i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i>.
<p>Results of backward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>0</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E</i><sub>0</sub>, which are calculated by Eq. (3) but with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i> being replaced by <i>E</i><sub>0</sub> and <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, respectively. <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>β=β33.91<i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i>.</p
Results of forward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, which are calculated by using Eq. (7), with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i>β=β23.02 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i>β=β26.54 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> (corresponding to the case with binding of EF-G.GDPNP).
<p>Results of forward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, which are calculated by using Eq. (7), with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i>β=β23.02 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i>β=β26.54 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> (corresponding to the case with binding of EF-G.GDPNP).</p
Schematic of the 30S subunit complexed mRNA containing one (a), two (b) and three (c) base pairs in the codon which is immediately adjacent to the mRNA entry channel in the 30S subunit.
<p>Schematic of the 30S subunit complexed mRNA containing one (a), two (b) and three (c) base pairs in the codon which is immediately adjacent to the mRNA entry channel in the 30S subunit.</p
- β¦