177 research outputs found

    ATP Concentration-Dependent Fractions of One-Head-Bound and Two-Head-Bound States of the Kinesin Motor during Its Chemomechanical Coupling Cycle

    No full text
    Kinesin is a typical motor protein that can use the chemical energy of ATP hydrolysis to step processively on microtubules, alternating between one-head-bound and two-head-bound states. Some published experimental results showed that the duration of the one-head-bound state increases greatly with a decrease in ATP concentration, whereas the duration of the two-head-bound state is independent of ATP concentration, indicating that ATP binding occurs in the one-head-bound state. On the contrary, other experimental results showed that the duration of the two-head-bound state increases greatly with a decrease in ATP concentration, whereas the duration of the one-head-bound state increases slightly with a decrease in ATP concentration, indicating that ATP binding occurs mainly in the two-head-bound state. Here, we explain consistently and quantitatively these contradictory experimental results, resolving the controversy that is critical to the chemomechanical coupling mechanism of the kinesin motor

    Dynamics of Forward and Backward Translocation of mRNA in the Ribosome

    No full text
    <div><p>Translocation of the mRNA-tRNA complex in the ribosome, which is catalyzed by elongation factor EF-G, is one of critical steps in the elongation cycle of protein synthesis. Besides this conventional forward translocation, the backward translocation can also occur, which can be catalyzed by elongation factor LepA. However, the molecular mechanism of the translocation remains elusive. To understand the mechanism, here we study theoretically the dynamics of the forward translocation under various nucleotide states of EF-G and the backward translocation in the absence of and in the presence of LepA. We present a consistent explanation of spontaneous forward translocations in the absence of EF-G, the EF-G-catalyzed forward translocations in the presence of a non-hydrolysable GTP analogue and in the presence of GTP, and the spontaneous and LepA-catalyzed backward translocation. The theoretical results provide quantitative explanations of a lot of different, independent experimental data, and also provide testable predictions.</p></div

    Summary of energy barriers during forward translocation.

    No full text
    <p>Summary of energy barriers during forward translocation.</p

    ATP Concentration-Dependent Fractions of One-Head-Bound and Two-Head-Bound States of the Kinesin Motor during Its Chemomechanical Coupling Cycle

    No full text
    Kinesin is a typical motor protein that can use the chemical energy of ATP hydrolysis to step processively on microtubules, alternating between one-head-bound and two-head-bound states. Some published experimental results showed that the duration of the one-head-bound state increases greatly with a decrease in ATP concentration, whereas the duration of the two-head-bound state is independent of ATP concentration, indicating that ATP binding occurs in the one-head-bound state. On the contrary, other experimental results showed that the duration of the two-head-bound state increases greatly with a decrease in ATP concentration, whereas the duration of the one-head-bound state increases slightly with a decrease in ATP concentration, indicating that ATP binding occurs mainly in the two-head-bound state. Here, we explain consistently and quantitatively these contradictory experimental results, resolving the controversy that is critical to the chemomechanical coupling mechanism of the kinesin motor

    Backward translocation.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Schematic of transition from post- (State POST) to pre-translocation state, including the classical non-ratchet state (State NR) and hybrid state (State hybrid). (b) Potential <i>V</i>(<i>x</i>) that characterizes the transition from the pre- to post-translocation state.</p

    Results of forward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, which are calculated by using Eq. (5), with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š23.87 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š24.24 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> (corresponding to the case in the absence of EF-G).

    No full text
    <p>Results of forward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>1</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, which are calculated by using Eq. (5), with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š23.87 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š24.24 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> (corresponding to the case in the absence of EF-G).</p

    Forward translocation.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Schematic of transition from pre-translocation state, including the classical non-ratchet state (State NR) and hybrid state (State hybrid), to post-translocation state (State POST). (b) Potential <i>V</i>(<i>x</i>) that characterizes the transition from the pre- to post-translocation state.</p

    Results of backward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>0</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E</i><sub>0</sub>, which are calculated by Eq. (3) but with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i> being replaced by <i>E</i><sub>0</sub> and <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, respectively. <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š33.91<i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Results of backward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>0</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E</i><sub>0</sub>, which are calculated by Eq. (3) but with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i> being replaced by <i>E</i><sub>0</sub> and <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, respectively. <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š33.91<i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i>.</p

    Results of forward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, which are calculated by using Eq. (7), with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š23.02 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š26.54 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> (corresponding to the case with binding of EF-G.GDPNP).

    No full text
    <p>Results of forward mRNA translocation time <i>T</i><sub>2</sub> as a function of energy barrier <i>E<sub>POST</sub></i>, which are calculated by using Eq. (7), with <i>E<sub>NR</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š23.02 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> and <i>E<sub>H</sub></i>β€Š=β€Š26.54 <i>k<sub>B</sub>T</i> (corresponding to the case with binding of EF-G.GDPNP).</p

    Schematic of the 30S subunit complexed mRNA containing one (a), two (b) and three (c) base pairs in the codon which is immediately adjacent to the mRNA entry channel in the 30S subunit.

    No full text
    <p>Schematic of the 30S subunit complexed mRNA containing one (a), two (b) and three (c) base pairs in the codon which is immediately adjacent to the mRNA entry channel in the 30S subunit.</p
    • …
    corecore