Safety and efficacy of methylester of conjugated linoleic acid (t10,c12 isomer) for pigs for fattening, sows and cows

A mixture of methylated conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers (t10,c12 and c9,t11) in equal proportions was not genotoxic and caused no reproductive toxicity. In a sub-acute study in dogs, a sub-chronic toxicity study in rats and a chronic study in dogs, no adverse effects were seen up to the highest levels tested. The maximum recommended feed concentration (5 g CLA (t10,c12)-ME from Lutalin (R)/kg feed for piglets, pigs for fattening and sows) or dose (30 g CLA (t10,c12)-ME from Lutrell (R) Pure/cow per day) is considered safe for target species. The CLA content of milk from cows treated with the highest recommended dose did not exceed background values (in milk of untreated cows) for both CLA isomers. An estimate of consumer exposure to both CLA isomers from food from pigs receiving 3 g of both CLA isomers/kg feed is <= 320 mg CLA isomers/person and day. This quantity corresponds to about 9% of the quantity considered safe for 6 months and is considered unlikely to raise concerns for consumer safety. Exposure of users by inhalation of the additive is likely to be minimal. Neither of the products under application, the liquid or the solid product, was tested as such for skin and eye irritation and skin sensitisation. The use of the additive in animal nutrition would not pose a risk to the environment. In pigs for fattening, CLA (t10,c12)-ME has a potential for improving feed to gain ratio. More consistent effects are a reduction in subcutaneous fat, an increase in intramuscular fat and fat firmness. No essential effects were found in sows. Administration of CLA to dairy cows reduces in a dose-dependent manner the fat content of milk, and milk fat yield. Energy balance in early lactation is improved by CLA (t10,c12)-ME; however, reproductive parameters were not influenced

Safety and efficacy of lactic acid and calcium lactate when used as technological additives for all animal species

This opinion concerns the re-authorisation of lactic acid and calcium lactate for use as preservatives in feed and a new authorisation for lactic acid as a preservative in water for drinking. The maximum level of 50 000 mg lactic acid/kg complete feed and 30 000 mg calcium lactate/kg complete feed are considered safe for functional ruminants and pigs. The maximum safe concentration in water for drinking for pigs can be derived from the maximum safe level in feed (15 000 mg lactic acid/L water). No conclusions on the safety of lactic acid in pre-ruminants and poultry can be drawn. These conclusions cannot be extrapolated to other animal species/categories. The use of lactic acid and calcium lactate as feed additives is safe for the consumer. Lactic acid is considered an irritant to eyes and skin and there is a risk of serious damage to the eyes. Inhalation of the mist causes irritation of the respiratory system. Calcium lactate should be considered an irritant to skin, eyes and the respiratory tract. It is likely that handling the additive will result in the production of respirable dust, which could present a risk to unprotected workers. The use of lactic acid and calcium lactate in animal nutrition would not pose a risk to the environment, provided that the concentrations regarded as safe for the target species are not exceeded. Lactic acid and calcium lactate are used in food as preservatives. It is reasonable to expect that the effect seen in food will be observed in feed when these additives are used at comparable concentrations and under similar conditions. However, the Panel has reservations about the effectiveness of lactic acid and calcium lactate as preservatives in complete feedingstuffs with a typical moisture content of <= 12 %

Long-term glucocorticoid exposure and incident cardiovascular diseases - the Lifelines cohort

CONTEXT: Long-term glucocorticoid levels in scalp hair (HairGCs), including cortisol and the inactive form cortisone, represent the cumulative systemic exposure to glucocorticoids over months. HairGCs have repeatedly shown associations with cardiometabolic and immune parameters, but longitudinal data are lacking.DESIGN: We investigated 6341 hair samples of participants from the Lifelines cohort study for cortisol and cortisone levels, and associated these to incident cardiovascular diseases (CVD) during 5-7 years of follow-up. We computed the odds ratio (OR) of HairGC levels for incident CVD via logistic regression, adjusting for classical cardiovascular risk factors, and performed a sensitivity analysis in subcohorts of participants &lt;60 years and &gt;= 60 years. Also, we associated HairGC levels to immune parameters (total leukocytes and subtypes).RESULTS: Hair cortisone levels (available in n = 4701) were independently associated with incident CVD (p &lt; 0.001), particularly in younger individuals (multivariate-adjusted OR 4.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91-9.07 per point increase in 10-log cortisone concentration (pg/mg), p &lt; 0.001). All immune parameters except eosinophils were associated with hair cortisone (all multivariate-adjusted p &lt; 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: In this large, prospective cohort study, we found that long-term cortisone levels, measured in scalp hair, represent a relevant and significant predictor for future cardiovascular diseases in younger individuals. These results highlight glucocorticoid action as possible treatment target for CVD prevention, where hair glucocorticoid measurements could help identify individuals that may benefit from such treatments.</p

Safety and efficacy of bentonite as a feed additive for all animal species

The EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) received a request from the European Commission to assess the safety and efficacy of bentonite when used as a technological feed additive (substances for reduction of the contamination of feed by mycotoxins) for all animal species. The applicant, EUBA aisbl (European Bentonite Association) representing six companies, submitted to EFSA a technical dossier to support the application. The applicant proposes to use bentonite at the maximum level of 20,000 mg/kg complete feed. The additive apparently interferes with the analysis of aflatoxin B1 in feed. The safety of the additive was already evaluated by the Panel in an opinion delivered in 2012. Bentonites are safe for all animal species, the consumers and the environment when used at a maximum level of 20,000 mg/kg complete feed. The results of a new genotoxicity study reinforced the previous conclusion that smectites are non-genotoxic. Bentonites are not skin irritants but might be mildly irritant to the eye; based on a new study submitted, the additive is not a skin sensitiser. Owing to its silica content, the additive is a hazard by inhalation for the users. The in vitro study showed that the di- and tri-octahedral smectites tested can adsorb aflatoxin B1 at different concentrations and at pH 5; however, no adequate in vivo studies were available. Therefore, the Panel cannot draw conclusions on the additive\u2019s efficacy. The Panel further considers the safety and efficacy conclusions to apply equally to the di- and tri-octahedral smectites under assessment. The FEEDAP Panel posted some recommendations regarding the maximum content of other minerals in the additive and the incompatibilities of the additive with other medicinal substances. The Panel also drew a remark concerning the denomination of the additive and the current regulatory definition of Bentonite

Safety and efficacy of a preparation of algae interspaced bentonite as a feed additive for all animal species

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a preparation of algae interspaced bentonite when used as a flatoxin B1 binder for all animal species. The additive is composed of bentonite and algae belonging to Ulva spp. The additive is considered safe for weaned piglets, dairy cows and chickens for fattening at the maximum recommended dose of 125 mg/kg complete feed (a wide margin of safety is established in weaned piglets and dairy cows); this conclusion is extrapolated to all animal species. The additive is not genotoxic. As bentonite is essentially not absorbed from the gut lumen and algae from Ulva spp. are not expected to be of concern for human consumption, the FEEDAP Panel considers that the use of the additive in animal nutrition is safe for consumers. The additive is not an irritant to the skin or the eyes and it is considered to have low inhalation toxicity. However, the additive has a high dusting potential and contains a high proportion offine particles. A high level of inhalation exposure to an inert dust may be hazardous. In the absence of data, the Panel could not conclude on dermal sensitisation. As the components of the additive are of natural origin (soil and marine environment), it is not expected that the use of the additive in animal nutrition would adversely affect the environment. The FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the efficacy of the additive for all animal species

Safety and efficacy of a preparation of algae interspaced bentonite as a feed additive for all animal species

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a preparation of algae interspaced bentonite when used as aflatoxin B1 binder for all animal species. The additive is composed of bentonite and algae belonging to Ulva spp. The additive is considered safe for weaned piglets, dairy cows and chickens for fattening at the maximum recommended dose of 125 mg/kg complete feed (a wide margin of safety is established in weaned piglets and dairy cows); this conclusion is extrapolated to all animal species. The additive is not genotoxic. As bentonite is essentially not absorbed from the gut lumen and algae from Ulva spp. are not expected to be of concern for human consumption, the FEEDAP Panel considers that the use of the additive in animal nutrition is safe for consumers. The additive is not an irritant to the skin or the eyes and it is considered to have low inhalation toxicity. However, the additive has a high dusting potential and contains a high proportion of fine particles. A high level of inhalation exposure to an inert dust may be hazardous. In the absence of data, the Panel could not conclude on dermal sensitisation. As the components of the additive are of natural origin (soil and marine environment), it is not expected that the use of the additive in animal nutrition would adversely affect the environment. The FEEDAP Panel could not conclude on the efficacy of the additive for all animal species