Economic and Humanistic Burden in Paediatric Patients with Atopic Dermatitis

Data concerning the economic and humanistic burden in patients with paediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) and their families are scarce. This retrospective study investigated these burdens in paediatric patients with AD using maintenance treatment with topical corticosteroids and/or conventional systemic immunosuppressants. Patient-reported outcomes regarding quality of life, AD severity, and parental work-related impairment were completed at inclusion. Data on healthcare resource utilization and medication prescription were collected retrospectively over the previous 12 months. Patients were categorized into mild, moderate or severe AD, based on Eczema Area and Severity Index score and medication use. Costs per patient per year per AD severity category were calculated. A total of 101 patients (median age 11.0 years (interquartile range 7.5-14.0), 47.5% men) were included, of whom 38 had mild AD, 37 moderate AD, and 26 severe AD. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) total costs patient per year for mild, moderate and severe AD were €1,812 ± €1,280, €2,680 ± €3,127, and €5,861 ±  €3,993, respectively. Highest total direct and indirect costs were found in patients with severe AD, mainly due to higher healthcare and medication costs. Highest humanistic burden was found in patients with moderate AD. For example, the median (interquartile range) Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure score was significantly higher in these patients compared with mild and severe AD (19.0 (15.0-24.0) vs 12.0 (8.8-15.0) and 17.0 (9.5-22.0), respectively). AD in paediatric patients incurs considerable direct and indirect costs, especially in patients with severe AD. The high humanistic burden in patients with moderate AD underlines the need for effective and safe new treatment options for children with AD

Comparative cost-effectiveness of focal and total salvage (125)I brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Focal salvage (FS) iodine 125 ((125)I) brachytherapy could be an effective treatment for locally radiorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). Toxicity is often reduced compared to total salvage (TS) while cancer control can be maintained, which could increase cost-effectiveness. The current study estimates the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of FS compared to TS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A decision analytic Markov model was developed, which compares costs and QALYs associated with FS and TS. A 3-year time horizon was adopted with six month cycles, with a hospital perspective on costs. Probabilities for genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and their impact on health-related quality of life (SF-36) were derived from clinical studies in the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis, using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, was performed to quantify the joint decision uncertainty up to the recommended maximum willingness-to-pay threshold of €80,000/QALY. RESULTS: Focal salvage dominates TS as it results in less severe toxicity and lower treatment costs. Decision uncertainty is small, with a 97-100% probability for FS to be cost-effective compared to TS (€0-€80,000/QALY). Half of the difference in costs between FS and TS was explained by higher treatment costs of TS, the other half by higher incidence of severe toxicity. One-way sensitivity analyses show that model outcomes are most sensitive to utilities and probabilities for severe toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Focal salvage (125)I brachytherapy dominates TS, as it has lower treatment costs and leads to less toxicity in our center. Larger comparative studies with longer follow-up are necessary to assess the exact influence on (biochemical disease free) survival and toxicity

Comparative cost-effectiveness of focal and total salvage (125)I brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Focal salvage (FS) iodine 125 ((125)I) brachytherapy could be an effective treatment for locally radiorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa). Toxicity is often reduced compared to total salvage (TS) while cancer control can be maintained, which could increase cost-effectiveness. The current study estimates the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of FS compared to TS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A decision analytic Markov model was developed, which compares costs and QALYs associated with FS and TS. A 3-year time horizon was adopted with six month cycles, with a hospital perspective on costs. Probabilities for genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and their impact on health-related quality of life (SF-36) were derived from clinical studies in the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis, using 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, was performed to quantify the joint decision uncertainty up to the recommended maximum willingness-to-pay threshold of €80,000/QALY. RESULTS: Focal salvage dominates TS as it results in less severe toxicity and lower treatment costs. Decision uncertainty is small, with a 97-100% probability for FS to be cost-effective compared to TS (€0-€80,000/QALY). Half of the difference in costs between FS and TS was explained by higher treatment costs of TS, the other half by higher incidence of severe toxicity. One-way sensitivity analyses show that model outcomes are most sensitive to utilities and probabilities for severe toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Focal salvage (125)I brachytherapy dominates TS, as it has lower treatment costs and leads to less toxicity in our center. Larger comparative studies with longer follow-up are necessary to assess the exact influence on (biochemical disease free) survival and toxicity