Alien Registration- Doiron, Philios (Jay, Franklin County)

https://digitalmaine.com/alien_docs/20793/thumbnail.jp

Immanuel Kant: Τι είναι η Κριτική του Καθαρού Λόγου

Η παρούσα εργασία αποσκοπεί στην ερμηνεία σύνολης της Κριτικής του Καθαρού Λόγου (ΚΚΛ) του Immanuel Kant. Για να επιτευχθεί μία τέτοια ερμηνεία προαπαιτείται η συνοπτική ανασυγκρότηση ολόκληρου του βιβλίου του Kant. Η ανασυγκρότηση αυτή αν και περιγραφική ως επί το πλείστον προχωράει τόσο σε επιμέρους ερμηνείες όσο και σε κριτική ανάλυση. Αυτή η ανασυγκρότηση καταλήγει στην παρουσίαση πινάκων που συνοψίζουν την δομή του εν λόγω βιβλίου. Στο τελευταίο κεφάλαιο και έπειτα κι από μία σύντομη βιβλιογραφική ανασκόπηση παρέχεται και η ερμηνεία μου η οποία δεν αφορά αποκλειστικά το κατά πόσο απαντάται το κεντρικό ερώτημα της ΚΚΛ που θέτει ο ίδιος ο Kant προς απάντηση, αλλά την ευρύτερη σημασία του φιλοσοφικού συστήματος που θεμελιώνει μέσω της ΚΚΛ. Αυτή η σημασία είναι, σύμφωνα με την ερμηνεία μου, η πρώτη ολοκληρωμένη μεταφυσική θεμελίωση του νεωτερικού υποκειμένου ως ελεύθερου υποκειμένου φορέα της Γνώσης και της Ηθικής. Πρόκειται, με άλλα λόγια, για την κατ’ εξοχήν Φιλοσοφία του Υποκειμένου.This study aims at an interpretation of the work of Immanuel Kant “Critique of Pure Reason” (CPR). For achieving such an interpretation a prerequisite is the concise reconstruction of this Kant’s work. This reconstruction ends up to a presentation of certain tables which summarize the structure of the book in question. In the last chapter of my study, after a brief but succinct survey of the related literature my interpretation is provided which does not concern exclusively the issue of whether the central question of CPR is answered that Kant himself poses for answering, but the wider significance of the philosophical system of which he lays the foundation by the CPR. According to my interpretation this significance is that for the first time a throughout metaphysical foundation of the Subject as a free subject that is bearer of knowledge as well as of morality. In other words Kant’s work under consideration is the Philosophy of Subject par excellence

Women in contact with the Sydney LGBTIQ communities: Report of the SWASH Lesbian, Bisexual and Queer Women’s Health Survey 2016, 2018, 2020

A lack of systematic, nuanced research on the health and wellbeing of Australian lesbian, bisexual and queer (LBQ) women (cis and trans) has been a significant barrier to understanding, recognising and addressing their health needs. A range of social, psychological and economic factors mean that this group has poorer health outcomes than their heterosexual peers. Stigma, family and community rejection, and discrimination towards LBQ women can impact on health and wellbeing, the delivery of health services, and their access to services. The inclusion of lesbian and bisexual women in the 2018 National Women’s Health Strategy1 and the 2018 NSW Women’s Strategy2 is recognition that while LBQ women share many health challenges with heterosexual women, some health problems may be more prevalent, risk factors may be different, and interventions may need to be tailored to the needs of this group. In NSW, the development of an LGBTI Health Strategy (due to be released in 2021) is an acknowledgment that health care systems need to consider how they provide health care to these populations to ensure equity of access and outcomes. The SWASH survey is a comprehensive survey of important health issues relevant to lesbian, bisexual, queer and other non-heterosexual identifying women engaged with Sydney’s lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer (LGBTIQ) communities. SWASH has been run by researchers in collaboration with ACON every two years since 1996, and since 2009 has been run by researchers at the University of Sydney. The survey is regularly revised to reflect the needs of LGBTIQ communities and knowledge deficits identified through research literature. Where possible, questions are sourced from established national surveys. Australian epidemiological data on the health and wellbeing of LBQ women remains limited. Sexuality and gender indicators are seldom included in large epidemiological surveys. Even when they are, data is often reported only by sexuality (e.g. LGB people vs heterosexual people) and not by sexuality and gender (e.g. LBQ women, GBQ men, heterosexual women, heterosexual men). SWASH provides a much-needed local evidence base to inform policy and best practice in healthcare and prevention for chronic diseases, mental health and wellbeing, sexual and reproductive health, and ageing. This report presents results from the three most recent iterations of the survey conducted at the Mardi Gras Fair Day and other community events and venues during the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras seasons in 2016, 2018 and 2020. In 2020, 1588 lesbian, bisexual, queer and other non-heterosexually identifying women (cis and trans) and non-binary people returned valid surveys; an unprecedented number in the 24-year history of the SWASH survey. This data provides unparalleled insights into the health of lesbian, bisexual, queer and other non-heterosexual identifying women aged 16 to 71 years who engaged with LGBTIQ communities in and around Sydney (where 85% of respondents reside). Our analyses highlight several areas of particular concern – many of which have persisted over time – where mainstream preventive health interventions that are inclusive of, or targeted to, LBQ women are needed