Performance on Middle School Geometry Problems with Geometry Clues Matched to Three Different Cognitive Styles

This study investigated the relationship between 3 ability-based cognitive styles (verbal deductive, spatial imagery, and object imagery) and performance on geometry problems that provided different types of clues. The purpose was to determine whether students with a specific cognitive style outperformed other students, when the geometry problems provided clues compatible with their cognitive style. Students were identified as having a particular cognitive style when they scored equal to or above the median on the measure assessing this ability. A geometry test was developed in which each problem could be solved on the basis of verbal reasoning clues (matching verbal deductive cognitive style), mental rotation clues (matching spatial imagery cognitive style), or shape memory clues (matching object imagery cognitive style). Straightforward cognitive style–clue-compatibility relationships were not supported. Instead, for the geometry problems with either mental rotation or shape memory clues, students with a combination of both verbal and spatial cognitive styles tended to do the best. For the problems with verbal reasoning clues, students with either a verbal or a spatial cognitive style did well, with each cognitive style contributing separately to success. Thus, both spatial imagery and verbal deductive cognitive styles were important for solving geometry problems, whereas object imagery was not. For girls, a spatial imagery cognitive style was advantageous for geometry problem solving, regardless of type of clues provided.Psycholog

Attitudes of potential recipients toward emerging visual prosthesis technologies

Abstract With the advent of multiple visual prosthesis devices to treat blindness, the question of how potential patients view such interventions becomes important in order to understand the levels of expectation and acceptance, and the perceived risk-reward balance across the different device approaches. Building on previous work on single device approaches done with blind individuals in Chicago and Detroit, USA, Melbourne, Australia, and Bejing, China, we investigated attitudes in blind individuals in Athens, Greece with coverage expanded to three of the contemporary approaches, Retinal, Thalamic, and Cortical. We presented an informational lecture on the approaches, had potential participants fill out a preliminary Questionnaire 1, then organized selected subjects into focus groups for guided discussion on visual prostheses, and finally had these subjects fill out a more detailed Questionnaire 2. We report here the first quantitative data that compares multiple prosthesis approaches. Our primary findings are that for these potential patients, perceived risk continues to outweigh perceived benefits, with the Retinal approach having the least negative overall impression and the Cortical approach the most negative. Concerns about the quality of restored vision were primary. Factors that drove the choice of hypothetical participation in a clinical trial were age and years of blindness. Secondary factors focused on positive clinical outcomes. The focus groups served to swing the impressions of each approach from neutrality toward the extremes of a Likert scale, and shifted the overall willingness to participate in a clinical trial from neutral to negative. These results, coupled with informal assessment of audience questions after the informational lecture, suggest that a substantial improvement in performance over currently available devices will be necessary before visual prostheses gain wide acceptance