Factors known to influence acceptance of clinical decision support systems

Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) have been shown to improve clinical performance and patient outcomes, but the failure rate of such systems is still over 50 percent. To contribute to a wider understanding of issues surrounding CDDS acceptance, we performed a systematic review of studies that evaluated CDSS implementations in clinical care to determine the factors that are associated with acceptance of CDSS by physicians. The factors that were found were categorized according to the HOT-fit framework. The mapping of factors concerning CDSS acceptance on the HOT-fit framework revealed gaps in each domain of the framework and showed that research has mainly focused on human and technology factors and a lack of research on organizational factors. A potential area of research could thus be studying the organizational factors that may influence CDSS acceptanc

Mobile health for older adult patients: Using an aging barriers framework to classify usability problems

BACKGROUND: With populations aging, digital health tools and mobile health applications (mHealth) are becoming more common to assist older people in independent living and self-management of (chronic) illnesses. These mHealth services can be beneficial to older patients, provided that they are adjusted to their needs and characteristics, as the current mHealth landscape lacks user-friendly services for this target group. Understanding of intrinsic aging barriers, which cause and impact usability problems older patients encounter, is needed to achieve this. OBJECTIVES: This study set out to assess usability problems older patients encounter in two mHealth apps and aims to show the value of MOLD-US, a recent aging barriers framework, as a classification tool to identify the intrinsic cause of these problems. METHOD: A case-study design, with in-depth analysis of usability issues older adult patients' experience. Data on usability issues were collected using the Think Aloud Protocol for two mHealth apps. The MOLD-US framework and Nielsen's severity rating were used to classify identified issues and their potential impact. RESULTS: In total 28 high severe usability issues of the mHealth apps were identified. Core natures of most issues were related to motivational and cognitive barriers of older adults. Participants had difficulties in understanding the navigation structure of the apps. Important text, buttons and icon elements were overseen. CONCLUSION: Current knowledge on creating interfaces for older target groups is not well applied within the assessed mHealth designs. Specifically, design guidelines should address older adults' diminishing cognition skills, physical ability and motivational barriers. By classifying usability problems with MOLD-US, insights on these barriers can be enhanced to adequately address these issues in new designs. In addition, we propose that future research focuses on investigating suitable usability evaluation methods adapted to older patients' characteristics to ultimately be able to gain unbiased sight on usability issues older patients may experience while interacting with technology

Reducing clinicians' cognitive workload by system redesign; a pre-post think aloud usability study

Interactive Health Information systems are often considered cognitively complex by their users, leading to high cognitive burden and increased workload. This paper explores if Think Aloud usability testing provides valuable input to effectively redesign a web-based Data Query Tool in Intensive Care and to reduce physicians' cognitive workload during system interaction. Pre and post redesign usability testing demonstrated a major reduction in the cognitive task workload after redesign of the tool. Classification of revealed usability problems by means of the User Action Framework pointed out that usability problems related to the cognitively planning of actions by system users foremost affected cognitive task workload. This result may support Health Information system (re)design efforts on how to tackle the system's cognitive complexity and in so doing improve on its usabilit

Eleven years of teledermoscopy in the Netherlands: A retrospective quality and performance analysis of 18,738 consultations

Introduction: Teledermoscopy supports and enhances the early detection of skin lesions by general practitioners in primary practice through remote consultation with dermatologists. Teledermoscopy has been a regular health service in Dutch primary care since February 2009. Teledermoscopy quality and performance outcomes on Dutch general practitioner primary care 11 years after its implementation were assessed. Methods: Dutch primary care teledermoscopy consultation data was retrospectively analysed on timestamps and responses on non-mandatory evaluation questions posed to the general practitioner and teledermatologist during the teledermoscopy consultation process. Anonymized data (February 2009–February 2020) was extracted from a Dutch teledermoscopy service database. The timestamps and evaluation questions data were subject to the teledermoscopy quality and performance outcomes. A limited cost evaluation was performed. Results: A total of 18,738 teledermoscopy consultations were sent by 1341 general practitioners (February 2009–February 2020). For 3908 (31.9%) teledermoscopy consultations, the general practitioner requested second opinion advice which led to 712 (18.2%) extra teledermoscopy referrals of patients who would not have been referred without teledermoscopy, including skin cancer teledermoscopy diagnoses. The general practitioner followed the teledermatologists’ advice on patient referral for 8813 (88.5%) patients, reported 97.3% of the teledermoscopy consultations as helpful and 95.1% as instructive, referred 68.0% less patients with teledermoscopy availability, referred overall 59.4% less patients, and needed 5.4 minutes (median) for sending a teledermoscopy consultation. Teledermatologist's median answer and response time was 2 minutes and 2.4 hours, respectively. The estimated cost reduction was €144.18 ($164.65) (50.2%) per teledermoscopy patient. Discussion: Teledermoscopy is a useful service in general practitioner practice for requesting dermatologist advice in primary care settings to support the detection of skin lesion at an early stage and at lower costs. Teledermoscopy could also decrease the burden of secondary dermatology care since general practitioners reported that they did not refer the majority of patients to a dermatologist after the teledermoscopy consultation compared to their initial referral decision. General practitioners reported the teledermoscopy system as helpful and instructive which could contribute to enhancement of their dermatological knowledge