Additional file 1: of A conceptual model of treatment burden and patient capacity in stroke

(interview schedule 1). (DOC 110 kb

Additional file 2: of A conceptual model of treatment burden and patient capacity in stroke

(interview schedule 2). (DOC 122 kb

Additional file 3: of A conceptual model of treatment burden and patient capacity in stroke

(participant details). (DOCX 14 kb

Additional file 4: of A conceptual model of treatment burden and patient capacity in stroke

(new treatment burdens found from analysis of the interviews, not found in systematic review). (DOCX 16 kb

Effectiveness of interventions to support the transition home after acute stroke: a protocol for a systematic review [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Background Despite advances in the quality of acute stroke management, there are gaps in knowledge about effective support interventions to better manage the transition of care to home for patients with this complex condition. The goal of this systematic review is to explore the literature around support interventions available for patients as they navigate from acute hospital, rehabilitation or early supported discharge (ESD) services to independent living at home; and to establish if, in comparison with usual care or other comparative active interventions, support services offered to patients as they transition from acute hospital, inpatient rehabilitation/ESD to home, can achieve better patient and / or process outcomes. Protocol In June 2021, we will carry out, on electronic peer-reviewed databases, a comprehensive literature search based on a pre-defined search strategy, developed and conducted in collaboration with an Information Specialist. In an effort to identify all published trials we will perform citation tracking of included studies, check reference lists of relevant articles, review grey literature, and extend our search to google scholar. We will include randomised controlled trials (including cluster and quasi-randomisation) recruiting stroke patients transitioning to home, to receive either usual care or any support intervention designed to improve outcomes after stroke. The primary clinical outcome will be functional status. Two review authors will scrutinise trials, categorise them on their eligibility, and extract data. We will analyse the results for all trials and perform meta-analyses where possible. We will assess risk of bias for the included trials and use GRADE to assess the quality of the body of evidence. Patient and public involvement (PPI) engaged in the development of the research questions, and will participate in co-design of a strategy for dissemination of findings. Conclusions: The findings from this review will be used to identify knowledge gaps to direct future research<br

Effectiveness of interventions to support the transition home after acute stroke: a protocol for a systematic review [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: Despite advances in the quality of acute stroke management, there are gaps in knowledge about effective support interventions to better manage the transition of care to home for patients with this complex condition. The goal of this systematic review is to explore the literature around support interventions available for patients as they navigate from acute hospital, rehabilitation or early supported discharge (ESD) services to independent living at home; and to establish if, in comparison with usual care or other comparative active interventions, support services offered to patients as they transition from acute hospital, inpatient rehabilitation/ESD to home, can achieve better patient and / or process outcomes. Protocol: In September 2021, we will carry out, on electronic peer-reviewed databases, a comprehensive literature search based on a pre-defined search strategy, developed and conducted in collaboration with an Information Specialist. In an effort to identify all published trials we will perform citation tracking of included studies, check reference lists of relevant articles, review grey literature, and extend our search to google scholar. We will include randomised controlled trials (including cluster and quasi-randomisation) recruiting stroke patients transitioning to home, to receive either usual care or any support intervention designed to improve outcomes after stroke. The primary clinical outcome will be functional status. Two review authors will scrutinise trials, categorise them on their eligibility, and extract data. We will analyse the results for all trials and perform meta-analyses where possible. We will assess risk of bias for the included trials and use GRADE to assess the quality of the body of evidence. Patient and public involvement (PPI) engaged in the development of the research questions, and will participate in co-design of a strategy for dissemination of findings. Conclusions: The findings from this review will be used to identify knowledge gaps to direct future research.</div

PRISMA 2009 checklist -Supplemental material for Stroke care in Africa: A systematic review of the literature

<p>Supplemental material, PRISMA 2009 checklist for Stroke care in Africa: A systematic review of the literature by Gerard Urimubenshi, Dominique A Cadilhac, Jeanne N Kagwiza, Olivia Wu and Peter Langhorne in International Journal of Stroke</p

From Hospital to home: Applying a co‐design approach to determine the key components of an intervention to support transition‐to‐home after stroke

Background: People with stroke and their families face numerous challenges as they leave hospital to return home, often experiencing multifaceted unmet needs and feelings of abandonment. The essential elements of an intervention intended to support transition‐to‐home after stroke are unclear. Objective: The aim of the project was to engage in a co‐design process to identify the key components of a pragmatic intervention to inform a transition‐to‐home support pathway following stroke. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using a co‐design process engaging multiple stakeholders, including 12 people with stroke, 6 caregivers, 26 healthcare professionals and 6 individuals from stroke organisations in a series of three workshops, facilitated by the primary researcher, a wider team of researchers and an individual with lived experience of stroke. World Café methodology and Liberating Structures facilitation techniques were adapted to meet the aim of the workshops. Data collection involved observations during workshops, followed by summarising of findings and reaching group consensus agreement on outputs. Facilitated consensus on a prioritisation task resulted in the final output. Results: The co‐design group identified 10 key intervention components of a transition‐to‐home support pathway following stroke. These components focussed on enhancing collaboration, streamlining transition processes and facilitating post‐discharge support. While a stroke coordinator was considered a top priority, increased cross‐setting information sharing and community in‐reach, where community‐based healthcare staff extended their services into hospital settings to provide continuity care, were considered most feasible to implement. Conclusion: The co‐design approach, involving a multi‐stakeholder group and strengthened by patient and public involvement, ensured that the identified transition‐to‐home intervention components are meaningful and relevant for people with stroke and their families. Further co‐design workshops are required to refine, and feasibility test the components for generalisability within the wider Irish healthcare setting.</p

Additional file 1: of Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review

Fig. S1. Example EMBASE search for methods to replace missing variance, SD or standard error. (DOCX 20 kb

Additional file 2: of Dealing with missing standard deviation and mean values in meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a systematic review

Fig. S2. Example EMBASE search for methods to replace missing mean. (DOCX 20 kb