HIVAN and medication use in chronic dialysis patients in the United States: analysis of the USRDS DMMS Wave 2 study

BACKGROUND: The use and possible effects of factors known to improve outcomes in patients with human immunodeficiency virus associated nephropathy (HIVAN), namely of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE) and antiretroviral therapy, has not been reported for a national sample of dialysis patients. METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study of the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study (DMMS) Wave 2 to identify risk factors associated with increased mortality in these patients. Data were available for 3374 patients who started dialysis and were followed until March 2000. Cox Regression analysis was used to model adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) with HIVAN as a cause of end stage renal disease (ESRD) and its impact on mortality during the study period, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 3374 patients who started dialysis, 36 (1.1%) had ESRD as a result of HIVAN. Only 22 (61%) of patients with HIVAN received antiretroviral agents, and only nine patients (25%) received combination antiretroviral therapy, and only 14% received ACE inhibitors. Neither the use of multiple antiretroviral drugs (AHR, 0.62, 95% CI, 0.10, 3.86, p = 0.60), or ACE inhibitors were associated with a survival advantage. Patients with HIVAN had an increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.74, 95% Confidence Interval, 3.12, 7.32, p < 0.01) compared to patients with other causes of ESRD. CONCLUSIONS: Medications known to improve outcomes in HIV infected patients were underutilized in patients with HIVAN. Adjusted for other factors, a primary diagnosis of HIVAN was associated with increased mortality compared with other causes of ESRD

Survival of HIV infected patients on maintenance hemodialysis in Cameroon: a comparative study

Abstract Background There are conflicting reports on the impact of HIV in the era of combined antiretroviral (c-ART) on survival of patient with ESKD. We aimed to compare the one-year survival of HIV positive patients to that of their HIV negative counterparts with ESKD on maintenance haemodialysis in Cameroon. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the haemodialysis units of the Douala and Yaoundé General Hospitals. All HIV positive patients treated by maintenance haemodialysis between January 2007 and March 2015 were included. A comparative group of HIV negative patients with ESKD were matched for age, sex, co morbidities, year of dialysis initiation and haemodialysis unit. Relevant data at the time of haemodialysis initiation and during the first year of haemodialysis was noted. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan Meier and Cox regression hazard ratio estimator. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 57 patients with HIV and 57 without HIV were included. Mean age was 46.25 ± 11.41 years, and 52.6% were females in both groups. HIV nephropathy (50.9%) was the main presumed aetiology of ESKD in the HIV group, while chronic glomerulonephritis (33.3%) and diabetes (21.1%) were the main aetiologies in the HIV negative group. At initiation of dialysis, the median CD4 count was 212 cell/mm3 (IQR; 138–455) and 77.2% were receiving c-ART. The proportion of patients who initiated dialysis with a temporary venous catheter was similar in both groups (p = 0.06). After one year on haemodialysis, survival rate was lower in the HIV positive group compared to the HIV negative group (61.4%/78.9%, HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.03–4.08; p = 0.042).Kaplan Meier survival curve was in direction of a lower survival in HIV positive group (p = 0.052). Conclusion The one year survival of HIV positive patients on maintenance haemodialysis in Cameroon seems to be lower compared to their HIV negative counterparts