Application of In Vivo Induced Antigen Technology (IVIAT) to Bacillus anthracis

In vivo induced antigen technology (IVIAT) is an immuno-screening technique that identifies bacterial antigens expressed during infection and not during standard in vitro culturing conditions. We applied IVIAT to Bacillus anthracis and identified PagA, seven members of a N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase autolysin family, three P60 family lipoproteins, two transporters, spore cortex lytic protein SleB, a penicillin binding protein, a putative prophage holin, respiratory nitrate reductase NarG, and three proteins of unknown function. Using quantitative real-time PCR comparing RNA isolated from in vitro cultured B. anthracis to RNA isolated from BALB/c mice infected with virulent Ames strain B. anthracis, we confirmed induced expression in vivo for a subset of B. anthracis genes identified by IVIAT, including L-alanine amidases BA3767, BA4073, and amiA (pXO2-42); the bacteriophage holin gene BA4074; and pagA (pXO1-110). The exogenous addition of two purified putative autolysins identified by IVIAT, N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidases BA0485 and BA2446, to vegetative B. anthracis cell suspensions induced a species-specific change in bacterial morphology and reduction in viable bacterial cells. Many of the proteins identified in our screen are predicted to affect peptidoglycan re-modeling, and our results support significant cell wall structural remodeling activity during B. anthracis infection. Identification of L-alanine amidases with B. anthracis specificity may suggest new potential therapeutic targets

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of the Integrase Inhibitor Dolutegravir

Healthy subjects received dolutegravir at 50 mg in a single-dose crossover study while they were in the fasted state or with low-, moderate-, or high-fat meals. Food increased dolutegravir exposure and reduced the rate of absorption. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0–∞) increased by 33%, 41%, and 66% when administered with low-, moderate-, or high-fat meals, respectively, compared with fasting. This increase in dolutegravir exposure is not anticipated to impact clinical safety, and therefore dolutegravir can be taken with or without food and without regard to fat content

Inhibition of Receptor-Interacting Protein Kinase 1 in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Abstract Introduction Receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1), a key mediator of inflammation through necroptosis and proinflammatory cytokine production, may play a role in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as chronic plaque psoriasis. An experimental medicine study of RIPK1 inhibition with GSK2982772 immediate-release formulation at doses up to 60 mg three times daily in mild to moderate plaque psoriasis indicated that efficacy may be improved with higher trough concentrations of GSK2982772. Methods This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeat-dose study (NCT04316585) assessed the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of 960 mg GSK2982772 (once-daily modified-release formulation) in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Twenty-nine patients were randomized 2:1 to GSK2982772 (N = 19) or placebo (N = 10) for 12 weeks. Results GSK2982772 was well tolerated with trough concentrations greater than tenfold higher than the previous phase 1 study with immediate release. Despite near complete RIPK1 target engagement in blood and modest reduction in circulating inflammatory cytokines, the proportion of patients achieving 75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index score at week 12 was similar between GSK2982772 and placebo (posterior median 1.8% vs 4.9%, respectively), with an estimated median treatment difference of − 2.3%. This analysis incorporated historical placebo data through the use of an informative prior distribution on the placebo arm. Week 4 changes in skin biopsy gene expression suggested sufficient local drug exposure to elicit a pharmacodynamic response. Conclusion Administration of the RIPK1 inhibitor GSK2982772 to patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis did not translate into meaningful clinical improvements

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure‐response analysis of a single dose of sotrovimab in the early treatment of patients with mild to moderate COVID‐19

Abstract Sotrovimab is a recombinant human monoclonal antibody that has been shown to prevent progression to hospitalization or death in non‐hospitalized high‐risk patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 following either intravenous (i.v.) or intramuscular (i.m.) administration. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) and exposure‐response (ER) analyses were performed to characterize single dose sotrovimab pharmacokinetics (PK) and the relationship between exposure and response (probability of progression), as well as covariates that may contribute to between‐participant variability in sotrovimab PK and efficacy following i.v. or i.m. administration. Sotrovimab PK was described by a two‐compartment model with linear elimination; i.m. absorption was characterized by a sigmoid absorption model. PopPK covariate analysis led to the addition of the effect of body weight on systemic clearance and peripheral volume of distribution, sex on i.m. bioavailability and first‐order absorption rate (KA), and body mass index on KA. However, the magnitude of covariate effect was not pronounced and was therefore not expected to be clinically relevant based on available data to date. For ER analysis, sotrovimab exposure measures were predicted using the final PopPK model. An ER model was developed using the exposure measure of sotrovimab concentration at 168 h that described the relationship between exposure and probability of progression within the ER dataset for COMET‐TAIL. The number of risk factors (≤1 vs. >1) was incorporated as an additive shift on the model‐estimated placebo response but had no impact on overall drug response. Limitations in the ER model may prevent generalization of these results to describe the sotrovimab exposure‐progression relationship across severe acute respiratory syndrome‐coronavirus 2 variants

Intravenous zanamivir or oral oseltamivir for hospitalised patients with influenza: an international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial

Background Neuraminidase inhibitors are effective for the treatment of acute uncomplicated influenza. However, there is an unmet need for intravenous treatment for patients admitted to hospital with severe influenza. We studied whether intravenous zanamivir was a suitable treatment in this setting. Methods In this international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 16 years or older with severe influenza admitted to 97 hospitals from 26 countries. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1 stratified by symptom onset ≤4 days or 5–6 days) to receive 300 mg or 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, or standard-of-care (75 mg oral oseltamivir) twice a day for 5–10 days; patients were followed up for 28 days. The randomisation schedule, including stratification, was generated using GlaxoSmithKline's RandAll software. Patients, site study staff, and sponsor were masked to study treatment. The primary endpoint was time to clinical response—a composite of vital sign stabilisation and hospital discharge—in the influenza-positive population. The trial was powered to show an improvement of 1·5 days or greater with 600 mg intravenous zanamivir. Pharmacokinetic, safety, and virology endpoints were also assessed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01231620. Findings Between Jan 15, 2011, and Feb 12, 2015, 626 patients were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=201), 600 mg intravenous zanamivir (n=209), or 75 mg oral oseltamivir (n=205) twice a day; 11 patients discontinued the study before receiving any study treatment. 488 (78%) of 626 patients had laboratory-confirmed influenza. Compared with a median time to clinical response of 5·14 days in the 600 mg intravenous zanamivir group, the median time to clinical response was 5·87 days (difference of −0·73 days, 95% CI −1·79 to 0·75; p=0·25) in the 300 mg intravenous zanamivir group and 5·63 days (difference of −0·48 days, 95% CI −2·11 to 0·97; p=0·39) in the oseltamivir group. Four patients with influenza A/H1N1pdm09 in the oseltamivir group developed H275Y resistance mutations. Adverse events were reported in 373 (61%) of treated patients and were similar across treatment groups; the most common adverse events (300 mg intravenous zanamivir, 600 mg intravenous zanamivir, oseltamivir) were diarrhoea (10 [5%], 15 [7%], 14 [7%]), respiratory failure (11 [5%], 14 [7%], 11 [5%]), and constipation (7 [3%], 13 [6%], 10 [5%]). 41 (7%) treated patients died during the study (15 [7%], 15 [7%], 11 [5%]); the most common causes of death were respiratory failure and septic shock. Interpretation Time to clinical response to intravenous zanamivir dosed at 600 mg was not superior to oseltamivir or 300 mg intravenous zanamivir. All treatments had a similar safety profile in hospitalised patients with severe influenza. Funding GlaxoSmithKline.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe