2 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Soil-Structure Interaction for low damage Seismic Rocking Systems
In earthquake prone areas, stakeholders now ask for low damage systems that can be easily repaired, following even earthquakes of catastrophic potential. Seismic protection of structures by means of rocking isolation is becoming increasingly popular, since allowing uplift is an inexpensive way to reduce the damage demand placed in structures. However, understanding the role of soil–structure interaction in the response of rocking systems remains a challenge. The goal of this thesis is to offer new knowledge on this field by assessing experimentally and computationally the response of rocking structures and the soil they are founded in.
For the first time, structural and foundation rocking are unified under a common experimental campaign. Two building models, designed to rock above or below their foundation level so that they can reproduce structural and foundation rocking respectively, were tested side by side in a centrifuge. The models were placed on a dry sand bed and subjected to a sequence of earthquake motions. Dense and then medium dense (loose) sand were used.
The range of rocking amplitude that is required for base isolation was quantified. Overall, it is shown that the relative density of sand does not influence structural rocking, while for foundation rocking, the change from dense to loose sand can affect the time‐frequency response significantly and lead to more predictable load demands. Results also demonstrate that the rocking motion of the buildings is evident in the soil response beneath the structures, and foundation rocking causes larger dynamic differential settlements than structural rocking for a given rocking amplitude.
Within OpenSees, foundation and structural rocking were modelled using a Beam-on-a-Nonlinear-Winkler-Foundation model (BNWF). The modelling incorporated flat-slider elements for footing-soil and superstructure-footing interactions, respectively. A modified BNWF model (mBNWF) was presented that involved an uplift-dependent stiffness and viscosity transmission for both vertical and horizontal directions, and a friction-vertical force coupling. In general, the proposed modelling approach, without calibration, adequately captured the experimental response observed in centrifuge experiments. Due to its inherent dependency on initial conditions, foundation rocking was found more sensitive than structural rocking to the type of soil model and the soil properties. Finally, selecting appropriate modal damping ratios can further improve the response profile and based on these parameters a calibration scheme was proposed.EPSRC FIBE CDT, UK (College and Tuition Fees)
EPSRC FIBE CDT, UK (Secondment expenses)
University of California at Berkeley, USA (Secondment expenses)
Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust, UK (hardship funding)
A. G. Leventis Foundation, Greece (Funding for living costs
Recommended from our members
Soil behaviour beneath buildings with structural and foundation rocking
Structural or foundation rocking are effective ways to prevent the development of large force demands in building systems experiencing ground shaking. In practice, structural rocking may result in large displacements and therefore is often accompanied with dampers, while residual and differential settlements are sometimes a barrier for utilisation of foundation rocking. This paper presents a novel approach to test simultaneously in a centrifuge the performances of a building model rocking above its foundation level (structural rocking) and of a dynamically equivalent building rocking below its foundation level (foundation rocking). These tests are used to explore the role of the foundation and soil response when considering the relative trade-offs between the two building types. In the experiments, dry sand was used in both dense and loose states and a series of earthquake excitations were applied. Results demonstrate that the rocking motion of the buildings is evident in the soil response beneath the structures, and foundation rocking causes larger dynamic differential settlements than structural rocking for a given rocking amplitude. However, these differential settlements may still be small enough to be tolerated from a serviceability limit state point of view.... the authors gracefully acknowledge the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for funding this research through the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Future Infrastructure and Built Environment (EPSRC grant reference number EP/L016095/1)