Single Spin Asymmetry ANA_N in Polarized Proton-Proton Elastic Scattering at s=200\sqrt{s}=200 GeV

We report a high precision measurement of the transverse single spin asymmetry $A_N$ at the center of mass energy $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV in elastic proton-proton scattering by the STAR experiment at RHIC. The $A_N$ was measured in the four-momentum transfer squared $t$ range $0.003 \leqslant |t| \leqslant 0.035$ \GeVcSq, the region of a significant interference between the electromagnetic and hadronic scattering amplitudes. The measured values of $A_N$ and its $t$-dependence are consistent with a vanishing hadronic spin-flip amplitude, thus providing strong constraints on the ratio of the single spin-flip to the non-flip amplitudes. Since the hadronic amplitude is dominated by the Pomeron amplitude at this $\sqrt{s}$, we conclude that this measurement addresses the question about the presence of a hadronic spin flip due to the Pomeron exchange in polarized proton-proton elastic scattering.Comment: 12 pages, 6 figure

Systematic Reviews of Animal Experiments Demonstrate Poor Human Clinical and Toxicological Utility

The assumption that animal models are reasonably predictive of human outcomes provides the basis for their widespread use in toxicity testing and in biomedical research aimed at developing cures for human diseases. To investigate the validity of this assumption, the comprehensive Scopus biomedical bibliographic databases were searched for published systematic reviews of the human clinical or toxicological utility of animal experiments. In 20 reviews in which clinical utility was examined, the authors concluded that animal models were either significantly useful in contributing to the development of clinical interventions, or were substantially consistent with clinical outcomes, in only two cases, one of which was contentious. These included reviews of the clinical utility of experiments expected by ethics committees to lead to medical advances, of highly-cited experiments published in major journals, and of chimpanzee experiments — those involving the species considered most likely to be predictive of human outcomes. Seven additional reviews failed to clearly demonstrate utility in predicting human toxicological outcomes, such as carcinogenicity and teratogenicity. Consequently, animal data may not generally be assumed to be substantially useful for these purposes. Possible causes include interspecies differences, the distortion of outcomes arising from experimental environments and protocols, and the poor methodological quality of many animal experiments, which was evident in at least 11 reviews. No reviews existed in which the majority of animal experiments were of good methodological quality. Whilst the effects of some of these problems might be minimised with concerted effort (given their widespread prevalence), the limitations resulting from interspecies differences are likely to be technically and theoretically impossible to overcome. Non-animal models are generally required to pass formal scientific validation prior to their regulatory acceptance. In contrast, animal models are simply assumed to be predictive of human outcomes. These results demonstrate the invalidity of such assumptions. The consistent application of formal validation studies to all test models is clearly warranted, regardless of their animal, non-animal, historical, contemporary or possible future status. Likely benefits would include, the greater selection of models truly predictive of human outcomes, increased safety of people exposed to chemicals that have passed toxicity tests, increased efficiency during the development of human pharmaceuticals and other therapeutic interventions, and decreased wastage of animal, personnel and financial resources. The poor human clinical and toxicological utility of most animal models for which data exists, in conjunction with their generally substantial animal welfare and economic costs, justify a ban on animal models lacking scientific data clearly establishing their human predictivity or utility

Effect of event selection on jetlike correlation measurement in d+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV

AbstractDihadron correlations are analyzed in sNN=200 GeV d+Au collisions classified by forward charged particle multiplicity and zero-degree neutral energy in the Au-beam direction. It is found that the jetlike correlated yield increases with the event multiplicity. After taking into account this dependence, the non-jet contribution on the away side is minimal, leaving little room for a back-to-back ridge in these collisions

Beam-energy Dependence Of Charge Balance Functions From Au + Au Collisions At Energies Available At The Bnl Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Balance functions have been measured in terms of relative pseudorapidity (Δη) for charged particle pairs at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider from Au + Au collisions at sNN=7.7GeV to 200 GeV using the STAR detector. These results are compared with balance functions measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider from Pb + Pb collisions at sNN=2.76TeV by the ALICE Collaboration. The width of the balance function decreases as the collisions become more central and as the beam energy is increased. In contrast, the widths of the balance functions calculated using shuffled events show little dependence on centrality or beam energy and are larger than the observed widths. Balance function widths calculated using events generated by UrQMD are wider than the measured widths in central collisions and show little centrality dependence. The measured widths of the balance functions in central collisions are consistent with the delayed hadronization of a deconfined quark gluon plasma (QGP). The narrowing of the balance function in central collisions at sNN=7.7 GeV implies that a QGP is still being created at this relatively low energy. © 2016 American Physical Society.942CNPq, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationMOE, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaMOST, Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNRF-2012004024, National Research FoundationNSF, National Stroke FoundationConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq

J/ψ polarization in p+p collisions at s=200 GeV in STAR

AbstractWe report on a polarization measurement of inclusive J/ψ mesons in the di-electron decay channel at mid-rapidity at 2<pT<6 GeV/c in p+p collisions at s=200 GeV. Data were taken with the STAR detector at RHIC. The J/ψ polarization measurement should help to distinguish between different models of the J/ψ production mechanism since they predict different pT dependences of the J/ψ polarization. In this analysis, J/ψ polarization is studied in the helicity frame. The polarization parameter λθ measured at RHIC becomes smaller towards high pT, indicating more longitudinal J/ψ polarization as pT increases. The result is compared with predictions of presently available models

Search for the Chiral Magnetic Effect in Au+Au collisions at sNN=27\sqrt{s_{_{\rm{NN}}}}=27 GeV with the STAR forward Event Plane Detectors

A decisive experimental test of the Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) is considered one of the major scientific goals at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC) towards understanding the nontrivial topological fluctuations of the Quantum Chromodynamics vacuum. In heavy-ion collisions, the CME is expected to result in a charge separation phenomenon across the reaction plane, whose strength could be strongly energy dependent. The previous CME searches have been focused on top RHIC energy collisions. In this Letter, we present a low energy search for the CME in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm{NN}}}}=27$ GeV. We measure elliptic flow scaled charge-dependent correlators relative to the event planes that are defined at both mid-rapidity $|\eta|<1.0$ and at forward rapidity $2.1 < |\eta|<5.1$. We compare the results based on the directed flow plane ($\Psi_1$) at forward rapidity and the elliptic flow plane ($\Psi_2$) at both central and forward rapidity. The CME scenario is expected to result in a larger correlation relative to $\Psi_1$ than to $\Psi_2$, while a flow driven background scenario would lead to a consistent result for both event planes[1,2]. In 10-50\% centrality, results using three different event planes are found to be consistent within experimental uncertainties, suggesting a flow driven background scenario dominating the measurement. We obtain an upper limit on the deviation from a flow driven background scenario at the 95\% confidence level. This work opens up a possible road map towards future CME search with the high statistics data from the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Phase-II.Comment: main: 8 pages, 5 figures; supplementary material: 2 pages, 1 figur

Dielectron Azimuthal Anisotropy At Mid-rapidity In Au+au Collisions At Snn =200 Gev

We report on the first measurement of the azimuthal anisotropy (v2) of dielectrons (e+e- pairs) at mid-rapidity from sNN=200 GeV Au+Au collisions with the STAR detector at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC), presented as a function of transverse momentum (pT) for different invariant-mass regions. In the mass region Mee<1.1 GeV/c2 the dielectron v2 measurements are found to be consistent with expectations from π0,η,ω, and φ decay contributions. In the mass region 1.1<Mee<2.9GeV/c2, the measured dielectron v2 is consistent, within experimental uncertainties, with that from the cc¯ contributions.906Adams, J., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 102. , NUPABL 0375-9474Arsene, I., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 1. , NUPABL 0375-9474Adcox, K., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 184. , NUPABL 0375-9474Back, B.B., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 28. , NUPABL 0375-9474Rapp, R., Wambach, J., (2002) Adv. Nucl. Phys., 25, p. 1. , 0065-2970David, G., Rapp, R., Xu, Z., (2008) Phys. Rep., 462, p. 176. , PRPLCM 0370-1573Agakichiev, G., (2005) Eur. Phys. J. C, 41, p. 475. , EPCFFB 1434-6044Arnaldi, R., (2006) Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, p. 162302. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Brown, G.E., Rho, M., (1996) Phys. Rep., 269, p. 333. , PRPLCM 0370-1573Rapp, R., Wambach, J., (1999) Eur. Phys. J. A, 6, p. 415. , EPJAFV 1434-6001Dusling, K., Teaney, D., Zahed, I., (2007) Phys. Rev. C, 75, p. 024908. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Van Hees, H., Rapp, R., (2008) Nucl. Phys. A, 806, p. 339. , NUPABL 0375-9474Renk, T., Ruppert, J., (2008) Phys. Rev. C, 77, p. 024907. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 034911. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adamczyk, L., (2014) Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, p. 022301. , a longer version (unpublished). PRLTAO 0031-9007Rapp, R., Wambach, J., Van Hees, H., (2010) Relativistic Heavy-Ion Physics, , in, edited by R. Stock, Landolt Börnstein New Series I/23A (Springer, Berlin), Chap. 4-1Linnyk, O., Cassing, W., Manninen, J., Bratkovskaya, E.L., Ko, C.M., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 85, p. 024910. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Xu, J.-H., Chen, H.F., Dong, X., Wang, Q., Zhang, Y.F., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 85, p. 024906. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2010) Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, p. 132301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., (1998) Phys. Rev. C, 58, p. 1671. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2012) Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, p. 122302. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Van Hees, H., Gale, C., Rapp, R., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 84, p. 054906. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Chatterjee, R., Srivastava, D.K., Heinz, U., Gale, C., (2007) Phys. Rev. C, 75, p. 054909. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2009) Phys. Lett. B, 670, p. 313. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693Bonner, B., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 508, p. 181. , NIMAER 0168-9002Shao, M., (2002) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 492, p. 344Wu, J., (2005) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 538, p. 243. , NIMAER 0168-9002Landgraf, J.M., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 762. , NIMAER 0168-9002Ackermann, K.H., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 624. , NIMAER 0168-9002Anderson, M., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 659. , NIMAER 0168-9002Bichsel, H., (2006) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 562, p. 154. , NIMAER 0168-9002Xu, Y., (2010) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 614, p. 28. , NIMAER 0168-9002Shao, M., (2006) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 558, p. 419. , NIMAER 0168-9002Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Lett. B, 616, p. 8. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693Ruan, L., Ph.D. thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, 2005, arXiv:nucl-ex/0503018 (unpublished)Llope, W.J., (2004) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 522, p. 252. , NIMAER 0168-9002Adler, C., (2002) Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, p. 202301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, p. 062301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Adamczyk, L., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 86, p. 024906. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Zhao, J., (2013), https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/theses/phd-32, Ph.D. thesis, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, (unpublished)Voloshin, S.A., Poskanzer, A.M., Snellings, R., (2010) Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics, pp. 5-54. , in, Landolt-Börnstein Vol. 1/23 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), ppAdamczyk, L., (2013) Phys. Rev. C, 88, p. 014902. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Abelev, B.I., (2008) Phys. Rev. C, 77, p. 054901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Abelev, B.I., (2006) Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, p. 152301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 034909. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 064903. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Lett. B, 612, p. 181. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693Adler, S.S., (2007) Phys. Rev. C, 75, p. 024909. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Tang, Z., Xu, Y., Ruan, L., Van Buren, G., Wang, F., Xu, Z., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 051901. , (R) () PRVCAN 0556-2813Shao, M., Yi, L., Tang, Z., Chen, H., Li, C., Xu, Z., (2010) J. Phys. G, 37, p. 085104. , JPGPED 0954-3899Afanasiev, S., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 80, p. 054907. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Rev. C, 72, p. 014904. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Abelev, B.I., (2007) Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, p. 112301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Kroll, N.M., Wada, W., (1955) Phys. Rev., 98, p. 1355. , PHRVAO 0031-899XRuan, L., (2011) Nucl. Phys. A, 855, p. 269. , NUPABL 0375-9474Huang, B., (2011), Ph.D. thesis, University of Science and Technology of China, (unpublished)Sjöstrand, T., (2001) Comput. Phys. Commun., 135, p. 238. , CPHCBZ 0010-4655Adamczyk, L., (2012) Phys. Rev. D, 86, p. 072013. , PRVDAQ 1550-7998Agakishiev, H., (2011) Phys. Rev. D, 83, p. 052006. , PRVDAQ 1550-7998Adare, A., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 84, p. 044905. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 85, p. 064914. , PRVCAN 0556-2813Adare, A., (2007) Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, p. 162301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Adams, J., (2004) Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, p. 052302. , PRLTAO 0031-9007Vujanovic, G., Young, C., Schenke, B., Jeon, S., Rapp, R., Gale, C., (2013) Nucl. Phys. A, 904-905, p. 557c. , NUPABL 0375-9474Vujanovic, G., Young, C., Schenke, B., Jeon, S., Rapp, R., Gale, C., (2014) Phys. Rev. C, 89, p. 034904. , PRVCAN 0556-281

J/ψ Production At Low Pt In Au+au And Cu+cu Collisions At Snn =200 Gev With The Star Detector

The J/ψ pT spectrum and nuclear modification factor (RAA) are reported for pT<5GeV/c and |y|<1 from 0% to 60% central Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at sNN=200GeV at STAR. A significant suppression of pT-integrated J/ψ production is observed in central Au+Au events. The Cu+Cu data are consistent with no suppression, although the precision is limited by the available statistics. RAA in Au+Au collisions exhibits a strong suppression at low transverse momentum and gradually increases with pT. The data are compared to high-pT STAR results and previously published BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider results. Comparing with model calculations, it is found that the invariant yields at low pT are significantly above hydrodynamic flow predictions but are consistent with models that include color screening and regeneration. © 2014 American Physical Society.902CNRS/IN2P3; NSF; Arthritis National Research Foundation; NRF-2012004024; ANRF; Arthritis National Research FoundationMatsui, T., Satz, H., (1986) Phys Lett. B, 178, p. 416. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(86)91404-8Digal, S., Petreczky, P., Satz, H., (2001) Phys. Rev. D, 64, p. 094015. , 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.094015Karsch, F., Kharzeev, D., Satz, H., Sequential charmonium dissociation (2006) Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics, 637 (1-2), pp. 75-80. , DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.03.078, PII S037026930600445XBraun-Munzinger, P., Stachel, J., The quest for the quark-gluon plasma (2007) Nature, 448 (7151), pp. 302-309. , DOI 10.1038/nature06080, PII NATURE06080Abreu, M.C., (1999) Phys. Lett. B, 449, p. 128. , (NA38 Collaboration),. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00057-XAbreu, M.C., (1997) Phys. Lett. B, 410, p. 327. , (NA50 Collaboration),. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)00914-3Arnaldi, R., Banicz, K., Castor, J., Chaurand, B., Cicalo, C., Colla, A., Cortese, P., Wohri, H.K., J/ψ production in indium-indium collisions at 158GeV/nucleon (2007) Physical Review Letters, 99 (13), p. 132302. , http://oai.aps.org/oai?verb=GetRecord&Identifier=oai:aps.org: PhysRevLett.99.132302&metadataPrefix=oai_apsmeta_2, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.132302Adare, A., Afanasiev, S., Aidala, C., Ajitanand, N.N., Akiba, Y., Al-Bataineh, H., Alexander, J., Al-Jamel, A., J/ψ production versus centrality, transverse momentum, and rapidity in Au+Au collisions at s NN=200 GeV (2007) Physical Review Letters, 98 (23), p. 232301. , http://oai.aps.org/oai?verb=GetRecord&Identifier=oai:aps.org: PhysRevLett.98.232301&metadataPrefix=oai_apsmeta_2, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.232301Adamczyk, L., (2013) Phys. Lett. B, 722, p. 55. , (STAR Collaboration),. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.04.010Abelev, B., (2012) Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, p. 072301. , (ALICE Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.072301Chatrchyan, S., (2012) J. High Energy Phys., (5), p. 063. , (CMS Collaboration),. JHEPFG 1029-8479 10.1007/JHEP05(2012)063Braun-Munzinger, P., Stachel, J., (2000) Phys. Lett. B, 490, p. 196. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00991-6Grandchamp, L., Rapp, R., (2002) Nucl. Phys. A, 709, p. 415. , NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01027-8Gavin, S., Vogt, R., (1996) Nucl. Phys. A, 610, p. 442. , NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/S0375-9474(96)00376-4Capella, A., (1997) Phys. Lett. B, 393, p. 431. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01650-4Karsch, F., Petronzio, P., (1988) Z. Phys. C, 37, p. 627. , ZPCFD2 0170-9739 10.1007/BF01549724Adare, A., (2012) Phys. Rev. D, 85, p. 092004. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.092004Charm, beauty and charmonium production at HERA-B (2005) European Physical Journal C, 43 (1-4), pp. 179-186. , DOI 10.1140/epjc/s2005-02308-8Vogt, R., Shadowing and absorption effects on J/ψ production in da collisions (2005) Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, 71 (5), pp. 1-11. , http://oai.aps.org/oai/?verb=ListRecords&metadataPrefix= oai_apsmeta_2&set=journal:PRC:71, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevC.71.054902, 054902Gavin, S., Gyulassy, M., (1988) Phys. Lett. B, 214, p. 241. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/0370-2693(88)91476-1Noble, J.V., (1981) Phys. Rev. Lett., 46, p. 412. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.412Tram, V., Arleo, F., (2009) Eur. Phys. J. C, 61, p. 847. , EPCFFB 1434-6044 10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-0864-yAlde, D., Baer, H., Carey, T., Garvey, G., Klein, A., (1991) Phys. Rev. Lett., 66, p. 133. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.133Leitch, M., (1992) Nucl. Phys. A, 544, p. 197. , (E772 and E789 Collaboration),. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/0375-9474(92) 90574-4Leitch, M., (2000) Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, p. 3256. , (NuSea Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3256Alessandro, B., Alexa, C., Arnaldi, R., Atayan, M., Baglin, C., Baldit, A., Beole, S., Willis, N., Charmonium production and nuclear absorption in p-A interactions at 450 GeV (2004) European Physical Journal C, 33 (1), pp. 31-40. , DOI 10.1140/epjc/s2003-01539-yAlessandro, B., Alexa, C., Arnaldi, R., Atayan, M., Beole, S., Boldea, V., Bordalo, P., Wu, T., A new measurement of J/ψ suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at 158 GeV per nucleon (2005) European Physical Journal C, 39 (3), pp. 335-345. , DOI 10.1140/epjc/s2004-02107-9Arnaldi, R., (2012) Phys. Lett. B, 706, p. 263. , (NA60 Collaboration),. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.11.042Adare, A., (2013) Phys. Rev. C, 87, p. 034904. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034904Adare, A., (2013) Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, p. 202301. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.202301Adare, A., (2011) Phys. Rev. Lett., 107, p. 142301. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.142301Zhao, X., Rapp, R., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 82, p. 064905. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.064905Adamczyk, L., (2013) Phys. Rev. Lett., 111, p. 052301. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.052301Ackermann, K.H., Adams, N., Adler, C., Ahammed, Z., Ahmad, S., Allgower, C., Amonett, J., Harris, J.W., STAR detector overview (2003) Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 499 (2-3), pp. 624-632. , DOI 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01960-5Llope, W.J., (2004) Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 522, p. 252. , NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/j.nima.2003.11.414Adler, C., Denisov, A., Garcia, E., Murray, M., Strobele, H., White, S., The RHIC zero-degree calorimeters (2003) Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 499 (2-3), pp. 433-436. , DOI 10.1016/j.nima.2003.08.112Llope, W., (2012) Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 661, pp. S110. , (Suppl. 1),. NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/j.nima.2010.07.086Reed, R., (2010) J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 219, p. 03020. , 1742-6596 10.1088/1742-6596/219/3/032020Beringer, J., (2012) Phys. Rev. D, 86, p. 010001. , (Particle Data Group),. 10.1103/PhysRevD.86.010001Beddo, M., Bielick, E., Fornek, T., Guarino, V., Hill, D., Krueger, K., LeCompte, T., Suaide, A.A.P., The STAR barrel electromagnetic calorimeter (2003) Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 499 (2-3), pp. 725-739. , DOI 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01970-8Miller, M.L., Reygers, K., Sanders, S.J., Steinberg, P., (2007) Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 57, p. 205. , ARPSDF 0163-8998 10.1146/annurev.nucl.57.090506.123020Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Lett. B, 673, p. 183. , (STAR Collaboration),. PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.02.037Bichsel, H., A method to improve tracking and particle identification in TPCs and silicon detectors (2006) Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 562 (1), pp. 154-197. , DOI 10.1016/j.nima.2006.03.009, PII S0168900206005353Shao, M., (2006) Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 558, p. 419. , NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/j.nima.2005.11.251Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 034909. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.034909Adamczyk, L., (STAR Collaboration), arXiv:1402.1791Spiridonov, A., arXiv:hep-ex/0510076Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 80, p. 041902. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.041902Tang, Z., Xu, Y., Ruan, L., Van Buren, G., Wang, F., Xu, Z., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 051901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.051901Tang, Z., Yi, L., Ruan, L., Shao, M., Chen, H., (2013) Chin. Phys. Lett., 30, p. 031201. , CPLEEU 0256-307X 10.1088/0256-307X/30/3/031201Adare, A., (2010) Phys. Rev. D, 82, p. 012001. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.012001Liu, Y., Qu, Z., Xu, N., Zhuang, P., (2009) Phys. Lett. B, 678, p. 72. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.06.006Heinz, U.W., Shen, C., (private communication)Adare, A., (2008) Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, p. 122301. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.122301Adams, J., (2003) Phys. Rev. Lett, 91, p. 172302. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.172302Adare, A., Afanasiev, S., Aidala, C., Ajitanand, N.N., Akiba, Y., Al-Bataineh, H., Alexander, J., Aoki, K., J/ψ Production versus transverse momentum and rapidity in p+p collisions at s=200GeV (2007) Physical Review Letters, 98 (23), p. 232002. , http://oai.aps.org/oai?verb=GetRecord&Identifier=oai:aps.org: PhysRevLett.98.232002&metadataPrefix=oai_apsmeta_2, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.232002Zhao, X., Rapp, R., (2008) Phys. Lett. B, 664, p. 253. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.03.06

Measurement Of Charge Multiplicity Asymmetry Correlations In High-energy Nucleus-nucleus Collisions At Snn =200 Gev

A study is reported of the same- and opposite-sign charge-dependent azimuthal correlations with respect to the event plane in Au+Au collisions at sNN=200 GeV. The charge multiplicity asymmetries between the up/down and left/right hemispheres relative to the event plane are utilized. The contributions from statistical fluctuations and detector effects were subtracted from the (co-)variance of the observed charge multiplicity asymmetries. In the mid- to most-central collisions, the same- (opposite-) sign pairs are preferentially emitted in back-to-back (aligned on the same-side) directions. The charge separation across the event plane, measured by the difference, Δ, between the like- and unlike-sign up/down-left/right correlations, is largest near the event plane. The difference is found to be proportional to the event-by-event final-state particle ellipticity (via the observed second-order harmonic v2obs), where Δ=[1.3±1.4(stat)-1.0+4.0(syst)]×10- 5+[3.2±0.2(stat)-0.3+0.4(syst)]×10-3v2obs for 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The implications for the proposed chiral magnetic effect are discussed. © 2014 American Physical Society.894NRF-2012004024; National Research FoundationArsene, I., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 1. , (BRAHMS Collaboration),. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.130Back, B.B., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 28. , (PHOBOS Collaboration),. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.084Adams, J., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 102. , (STAR Collaboration),. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.085Adcox, K., (2005) Nucl. Phys. A, 757, p. 184. , (PHENIX Collaboration),. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.086Lee, T.D., (1973) Phys. Rev. D, 8, p. 1226. , 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1226Lee, T.D., Wick, G.C., (1974) Phys. Rev. D, 9, p. 2291. , 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2291Morley, P.D., Schmidt, I.A., (1985) Z. Phys. C, 26, p. 627. , ZPCFD2 0170-9739 10.1007/BF01551807Kharzeev, D., Pisarski, R.D., Tytgat, M.H.G., (1998) Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, p. 512. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.512Kharzeev, D., (2006) Phys. Lett. B, 633, p. 260. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.075Kharzeev, D., Zhitnitsky, A., (2007) Nucl. Phys. A, 797, p. 67. , NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.10.001Fukushima, K., Kharzeev, D.E., Warringa, H.J., (2008) Phys. Rev. D, 78, p. 074033. , PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074033Kharzeev, D.E., McLerran, L.D., Warringa, H.J., (2008) Nucl. Phys. A, 803, p. 227. , NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298Voloshin, S.A., (2004) Phys. Rev. C, 70, p. 057901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.057901Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, p. 251601. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.251601Abelev, B.I., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 054908. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.054908Abelev, B., (2013) Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, p. 012301. , (ALICE Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.012301Wang, Q., (2012), http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/theses/phd/quanwang, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, arXiv:1205.4638Ackermann, K.H., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 624. , (STAR Collaboration),. NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01960-5Bieser, F.S., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 766. , (STAR Collaboration),. NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01974-5Adler, C., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 433. , NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/j.nima.2003.08.112Adams, J., (2004) Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, p. 112301. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.112301Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 79, p. 034909. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.034909Ackermann, K.H., (1999) Nucl. Phys. A, 661, p. 681. , (STAR Collaboration),. NUPABL 0375-9474 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)85117-3Anderson, M., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 499, p. 659. , NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01964-2Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., (1998) Phys. Rev. C, 58, p. 1671. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1671Wang, G., (2005), http://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/theses/ph-d/gang-wang, Ph.D. thesis, UCLAAdamczyk, L., (2012) Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, p. 202301. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.202301Wang, F., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 064902. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.064902Pratt, S., Schlichting, S., Gavin, S., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 84, p. 024909. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.024909Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, p. 152301. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.152301Aggarwal, M.M., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 82, p. 024912. , (STAR collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.024912Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. Lett., 102, p. 052302. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.052302Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 80, p. 064912. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.064912Abelev, B.I., (2010) Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, p. 022301. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.022301Agakishiev, H., (STAR Collaboration), arXiv:1010.0690Petersen, H., Renk, T., Bass, S.A., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 83, p. 014916. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.014916Adamczyk, L., (2013) Phys. Rev. C, 88, p. 064911. , (STAR Collaboration),. 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064911Asakawa, M., Majumder, A., Müller, B., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 064912. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.064912Bzdak, A., Koch, V., Liao, J., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, pp. 031901R. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.031901Liao, J., Koch, V., Bzdak, A., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 82, p. 054902. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.054902Ma, G.-L., Zhang, B., (2011) Phys. Lett. B, 700, p. 39. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.057Voloshin, S.A., (2010) Phys. Rev. Lett., 105, p. 172301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.17230

Beam-energy Dependence Of Charge Separation Along The Magnetic Field In Au+au Collisions At Rhic

Local parity-odd domains are theorized to form inside a quark-gluon plasma which has been produced in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. The local parity-odd domains manifest themselves as charge separation along the magnetic field axis via the chiral magnetic effect. The experimental observation of charge separation has previously been reported for heavy-ion collisions at the top RHIC energies. In this Letter, we present the results of the beam-energy dependence of the charge correlations in Au+Au collisions at midrapidity for center-of-mass energies of 7.7, 11.5, 19.6, 27, 39, and 62.4 GeV from the STAR experiment. After background subtraction, the signal gradually reduces with decreased beam energy and tends to vanish by 7.7 GeV. This implies the dominance of hadronic interactions over partonic ones at lower collision energies. © 2014 American Physical Society.1135DOE; National Research Foundation; CNRS/IN2P3; NSF; National Research Foundation; NRF-2012004024; National Research FoundationVafa, C., Witten, E., (1984) Phys. Rev. Lett., 53, p. 535. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.535Lee, D.T., (1973) Phys. Rev. D, 8, p. 1226. , PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.8.1226Lee, T.D., Wick, G.C., (1974) Phys. Rev. D, 9, p. 2291. , PRVDAQ 0556-2821 10.1103/PhysRevD.9.2291Kharzeev, D.E., McLerran, L.D., Warringa, H.J., (2008) Nucl. Phys., A803, p. 227. , NUPBBO 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.02.298Kharzeev, D., (2006) Phys. Lett. B, 633, p. 260. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.11.075Kharzeev, D., Zhitnitsky, A., (2007) Nucl. Phys., A797, p. 67. , NUPBBO 0375-9474 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.10.001Fukushima, K., Kharzeev, D.E., Warringa, H.J., (2008) Phys. Rev. D, 78, p. 074033. , PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.074033Kharzeev, E.D., (2010) Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam), 325, p. 205. , APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1016/j.aop.2009.11.002Gatto, R., Ruggieri, M., (2012) Phys. Rev. D, 85, p. 054013. , PRVDAQ 1550-7998 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.054013Abelev, B.I., (2009) Phys. Rev. Lett., 103, p. 251601. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.251601Abelev, B.I., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 054908. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.054908Adamczyk, L., (2013) Phys. Rev. C, 88, p. 064911. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064911Adamczyk, L., (2014) Phys. Rev. C, 89, p. 044908. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.044908Ajitanand, N.N., Esumi, S., Lacey, R.A., Proceedings of the RBRC Workshops, 2010, 96. , http://www.bnl.gov/isd/documents/74466.pdf, (PHENIX Collaboration), in, Vol.Ajitanand, N.N., Lacey, R.A., Taranenko, A., Alexander, J.M., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 83, p. 011901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.011901Abelev, B.I., (2013) Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, p. 012301. , (ALICE Collaboration),. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.012301Bzdak, A., Koch, V., Liao, J., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 81, p. 031901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.031901Liao, J., Koch, V., Bzdak, A., (2010) Phys. Rev. C, 82, p. 054902. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.054902Kharzeev, D.E., Son, D.T., (2011) Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, p. 062301. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.062301Voloshin, A.S., (2004) Phys. Rev. C, 70, p. 057901. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.057901Anderson, M., (2003) Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 499, p. 659. , NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01964-2Adams, J., (2005) Phys. Rev. C, 72, p. 014904. , (STAR Collaboration), ()PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.72.014904Agakishiev, G., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 86, p. 014904. , (STAR Collaboration), ()PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.014904Adamczyk, L., (2012) Phys. Rev. C, 86, p. 054908. , (STAR Collaboration),. PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.054908Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., (1998) Phys. Rev. C, 58, p. 1671. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1671Barrette, J., (1997) Phys. Rev. C, 56, p. 3254. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.56.3254Ollitrault, J.-Y., Poskanzer, A.M., Voloshin, S.A., (2009) Phys. Rev. C, 80, p. 014904. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.014904Abelev, B.I., (2008) Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, p. 252301. , (STAR Collaboration), () and references therein. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.252301Bzdak, A., Koch, V., Liao, J., (2011) Phys. Rev. C, 83, p. 014905. , PRVCAN 0556-2813 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.014905Ray, R.L., Longacre, R.S., arXiv:nucl-ex/0008009;Ray, R.L., Longacre, R.S., (private communication)Bass, S.A., (1998) Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 41, p. 255. , PPNPDB 0146-6410 10.1016/S0146-6410(98)00058-1Bleicher, M., (1999) J. Phys. G, 25, p. 1859. , JPGPED 0954-3899 10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/308Ma, G.-L., Zhang, B., (2011) Phys. Lett. B, 700, p. 39. , PYLBAJ 0370-2693 10.1016/j.physletb.2011.04.057Okorokov, A.V., (2013) Int. J. Mod. Phys. e, 22, p. 1350041. , IMPEER 0218-3013 10.1142/S0218301313500419Bzdak, A., Koch, V., Liao, J., (2013) Lect. Notes Phys., 871, p. 503. , LNPHA4 0075-8450 10.1007/978-3-642-37305-