Pain, depression, and quality of life in adults with MOG-antibody–associated disease

Background and purpose Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody–associated disease (MOGAD) is an inflammatory autoimmune condition of the central nervous system. However, data on pain and depression have remained scarce. The aim of this study was to assess features of chronic pain and depression as well as their impact on health-related quality of life (hr-QoL) in MOGAD. Methods Patients with MOGAD were identified in the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group registry. Data were acquired by a questionnaire, including clinical, demographic, pain (PainDetect, Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form, McGill Pain Questionnaire–Short Form), depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II), and hr-QoL (Short Form-36 Health Survey) items. Results Twenty-two of 43 patients suffered from MOGAD-related pain (11 nociceptive, eight definite neuropathic, three possible neuropathic) and 18 from depression. Patients with neuropathic pain had the highest pain intensity and most profound activities of daily living (ADL) impairment. Fifteen patients reported spasticity-associated pain, including four with short-lasting painful tonic spasms. Later disease onset, profound physical impairment, and depression were associated with chronic pain. Physical QoL was more affected in pain sufferers ($\it p$ < 0.001) than in pain-free patients, being most severely reduced by neuropathic pain ($\it p$ = 0.016). Pain severity, visual impairment, and gait impairment independently predicted lower physical QoL. Depression was the only factor reducing mental QoL. Twelve patients still suffering from moderate pain (pain severity 4.6 $\pm$ 2.3) received pain medication. Only four out of 10 patients with moderate to severe depression took antidepressants. Conclusions Being highly prevalent, pain and depression strongly affect QoL and ADL in MOGAD. Both conditions remain insufficiently controlled in real-life clinical practice

Apheresis therapies for NMOSD attacks

$\bf Objective$ To analyze whether 1 of the 2 apheresis techniques, therapeutic plasma exchange (PE) or immunoadsorption (IA), is superior in treating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attacks and to identify predictive factors for complete remission (CR). $\bf Methods$ This retrospective cohort study was based on the registry of the German Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group, a nationwide network established in 2008. It recruited patients with neuromyelitis optica diagnosed according to the 2006 Wingerchuk criteria or with aquaporin-4 (AQP4-ab)-antibody–seropositive NMOSD treated at 6 regional hospitals and 16 tertiary referral centers until March 2013. Besides descriptive data analysis of patient and attack characteristics, generalized estimation equation (GEE) analyses were applied to compare the effectiveness of the 2 apheresis techniques. A GEE model was generated to assess predictors of outcome. $\bf Results$ Two hundred and seven attacks in 105 patients (87% AQP4-ab-antibody seropositive) were treated with at least 1 apheresis therapy. Neither PE nor IA was proven superior in the therapy of NMOSD attacks. CR was only achieved with early apheresis therapy. Strong predictors for CR were the use of apheresis therapy as first-line therapy (OR 12.27, 95% CI: 1.04–144.91, $\it {p}$ = 0.047), time from onset of attack to start of therapy in days (OR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89–0.99, $\it {p}$ = 0.014), the presence of AQP4-abantibodies (OR 33.34, 95% CI: 1.76–631.17, $\it {p}$ = 0.019), and monofocal attack manifestation (OR 4.71, 95% CI: 1.03–21.62, $\it {p}$ = 0.046). $\bf Conclusions$ Our findings suggest early use of an apheresis therapy in NMOSD attacks, particularly in AQP4-ab-seropositive patients. No superiority was shown for one of the 2 apheresis techniques. $\textbf {Classification of evidence}$ This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with NMOSD, neither PE nor IA is superior in the treatment of attacks