Paper Tectonics

ProfessionalAcademi

Complexity And Contradiction In Florida Constitutional Law

I. THE ENIGMA OF GRAY V. BRYANT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 881 R II. ARMSTRONG’S UNCERTAIN DOMAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 885 R A. After Armstrong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 887 R B. Before Armstrong . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 R III. “BRASS, IRON, AND CLAY”—AMENDMENTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL FORM . . . . . . 894 R A. Straightforward Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 R B. Fear of Chaotic Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 900 R C. Complex Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 R IV. CONTRA BABEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 910 R A. Self-Executing Terms and Constitutional Complexity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 R 1. INTELLECTUAL ORIGINS OF “SUFFICIENT RULE” . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 912 R 2. “SUFFICIENT RULE” GIVEN COMPLEXITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 914 R a. Access to courts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 R b. Florida due process of law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 R c. The interpretive expectation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 R d. Some examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 920 R B. Canonical Indexes and Ballot Summary Accuracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 R 1. THE LEGISLATIVE SINGLE SUBJECT ANALOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 924 R 2. BALLOT SUMMARY ACCURACY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 928 R a. As applied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 929 R b. Buster revisited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931 R 3. OVERLAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 R V. PREMISES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 938 R A. Associating Voters, Judges, Administrators, and Legislators . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 R B. Institutional or Formal Complexity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 941 R APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 944

The Constitution Glimpsed from Tule Lake

Although Ex Parte Endo undid the wrongs that resulted from the US Supreme Court decision Korematsu v. United States, the Japanese Americans who faced internment during WWII cannot so easily put the past behind them. Gudridge examines the publication The Spoilage, which documents the political efforts of those inside the internment camp at Tule Lake, and relates them to Endo and Korematsu