9 research outputs found

    Therapeutic efficacy of platelet transfusion treated with amotosalen/UVA pathogen inactivation technology (INTERCEPTTM Blood System) in acute myeloid leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy with curative intent: a single center experience.

    Full text link
    The INTERCEPTTM Blood System (Intercept Blood System, Cerus Europe BV, Amersfoort, the Netherlands) has been used to reduce or inactivate pathogen load in platelet concentrates in France for three years

    Comparison of HLA antibody identification methods for the selection of platelet products for HLA ‐mediated platelet refractory patients

    Full text link
    In an ineffective transfusion context, solid‐phase immunoassays using the Luminex platform for the detection and characterization of HLA antibodies are currently used to select HLA‐compatible platelet products. A new HLA antibody identification method, the HISTO SPOT¼ HLA AB test (BAG Health care GmbH, Lich, Germany), based on the detection of antibodies directed against a recombinant single antigen (SA) by colored spots detected by HISTO MATCH HLA AB module software, runs fully automated on the MR.SPOT¼. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of the HISTO SPOT HLA AB and C1qScreenℱ (C1q SAB) assays with that of the Labscreen single antigen class I (OL SAB) assay to detect anti‐HLA class I antibodies in 56 serum samples from 54 platelet refractory acute myeloid leukemia patients who received HLA mismatch platelet concentrates at a single oncohematology center. In total, 1414 class I specificities, 433 HLA‐A and 981 HLA‐B, were detected by the OL SAB test. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was >5000 for 874 antigens and 5000, respectively, but did not identify 34% and 44% of OL SAB‐detected antigens, highlighting the lower sensitivity of these techniques. Interestingly, the donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs) identified by the HISTO SPOT¼ HLA AB and C1q SAB assays reacted against HLA mismatch platelet concentrates with the same specificity (86%) and positive predictive (77%) value as in the OL SAB test when the MFI threshold was >2000 for DSA detection. Although the HISTO SPOT¼ HLA AB test is less sensitive than the OL SAB test, this test could be used for the selection of HLA‐compatible platelet products

    Occurrence and severity of adverse events after autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell infusion are related to the amount of granulocytes in the apheresis product.

    Full text link
    International audienceBACKGROUND: Adverse events (AEs) after hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) infusion are rare but might be life-threatening. These reactions have traditionally been associated with the amount of infused cryoprotectant, but persistence of such events after dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) depletion has questioned this assumption. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The incidence of AEs on a cohort of 460 patients (490 HPC infusions) undergoing autologous DMSO-reduced HPC transplantation was prospectively evaluated. HPCs were collected from adult patients with various hematologic or solid malignancies. After quality control (QC) on fresh apheresis products and subsequent cryopreservation, HPC grafts were thawed and washed at the cell therapy facility. QC was performed on each graft after washing, and clinical data were collected for each infusion. RESULTS: AEs were reported in 66 cases (13.5%) and were graded according to the NCI-CTC scale from 1 to 4. Although none of the factors associated with patient characteristics or infusion procedure were different between the two groups (no AE vs. occurrence of AE), it was found that the absolute number of granulocytes measured before freezing was considerably higher in the AE group. Furthermore, within this group, there was a strong correlation between the amount of granulocytes and the grading of the reaction. CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates that AEs occurring in the setting of DMSO-reduced HPC grafts are directly related to the amount of granulocytes and thus emphasizes the need for high-quality apheresis products so as to improve the safety of HPC infusion

    Age at transplantation and outcome after autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The optimal treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is not well defined, in part because these patients are underrepresented in clinical studies. Autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) after high-dose melphalan chemotherapy can result in a prolonged response duration and survival in patients under 65 years of age. DESIGN AND SETTING: Single-center, retrospective study of patients treated at Paoli-Calmettes Institute Cancer Centre, between January 1994 and January 2007 (96 months) PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared the outcome of elderly (age >65 years) patients with younger patients aged between 60 and 65 years with MM. RESULTS: We compared 82 elderly patients with 104 younger patients. Except for age, both groups had comparable demographic features, disease characteristics, and prognostic factors. Induction VAD chemotherapy was comparable between the elderly (87%) and younger (94%) group. Prior to auto-SCT, the calculated hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific co-morbidity index was also comparable. With a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 5-227 months) after auto-SCT, 120 patients were still alive. Disease progression (n=40; 61%) was the main cause of death, and it was comparable in the two groups. Auto-SCT-related mortality was 3.8% (n=4/104) in younger and 3.7% (n=3/82) in older patients. Comparing younger/older subjects, progression-free survival was significantly higher in the younger group (P<.0001). However, disease response rates after the first auto-SCT was comparable and overall survival (OS) was also comparable (57% vs. 54% at 5 years, P=NS; 32% vs. 24% at 10 years, P=NS). In a Cox multivariate analysis model, none of the relevant characteristics was shown to be a critical prognostic feature for OS. CONCLUSIONS: Age was insignificant for both OS and transplant-related mortality. We conclude that there is no biological justification for an age-discriminate policy for MM therapy. Physiologic aging is likely more important than chronologic aging
    corecore