3 research outputs found
Perceptions on Liking and Disliking Public Agricultural Research Institutes in Uganda: A Case of Abi, Bulindi, Ngetta, Mbarara and Mukono ZARDIs
A ZARDI wide study project ‘Harnessing the domino effect for transformative technology promotion and outreach’ was carried in three different phases starting from 2018/19, 2019/20, 2020/2021. A multi stage qualitative studies were done through Focus Group Discussions, Key Informant Interviews, and observations in addition to employing the use of Social Resource Maps. Quantitative study carried from the five ZARDIs drew a total of N=1093 respondents. The study was subjected to two different tests carried to confirm; the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA) and Bartlett’s test of Sphericity (df) for factors explaining the liking and disliking of the PARIs. The study findings revealed two important factors for liking (Positive PARIs image); reliable and trusted source of technology and information, and exhibits good community relations. Factors explaining disliking (Negative PARIs image) include; Limited access to information, technologies and markets and in-adequate community outreach programs. This study concludes that, Public Agricultural Research Institutes are not just perceived by their managerial practices nor just defined by its programs and mandates, but they are functions of at least interrelated positive and negative factors. Keywords: Public perceptions, technology, likes and dislikes, image and ZARDIs. DOI: 10.7176/JRDM/76-04 Publication date:June 30th 202
Recommended from our members
Adoption intensity and ex-post economic evaluation of improved cassava varieties in Uganda
This thesis analyses the adoption patterns of improved cassava varieties and estimates the
economic impact of research and development on the producers in Uganda. Adoption
patterns were evaluated by examining the extent of adoption using Tobit regression
analysis. Economic impacts of introduced cassava varieties that are tolerant to cassava
mosaic disease, green mites, and white flies, were estimated using economic surplus
analysis.
The results suggest that improved varieties have diffused widely including the extent of
adoption measured by proportion of land planted. The study showed that women were
more involved than men in the production activities, however they received less attention
from extension services. The results from the adoption analysis suggest that the larger the
years of experience in growing cassava, size of farmland, number of land parcels owned,
number of food crops grown, information from traders, level of satisfaction with extension
services, significantly decrease the extent of adoption of improved cassava varieties. The
performance of improved varieties, information obtained from fellow farmers, from
extension, from research, and the value of cassava output, significantly increase the
intensity of adoption of improved cassava varieties.
The economic surplus generated by cassava research and dissemination of the improved
cassava varieties was US$210 million over the period 2000-2014. Cassava research had very
high returns indicating under-investment. The benefit cost ratio was positive and greater
than unity, suggesting that the monies invested are yielding benefits. However, the results
also indicate that annual benefits to society are reducing and therefore need to disseminate and multiply newer varieties that are able to tolerate emerging pests and diseases, and
meet farmer expectations