Fibrinolytic study in plasma and ascitic fluid of cirrhotic patients before and after ascites concentration; reinfusion technique.

Management of cirrhosis with massive ascites involves particular difficulties. The introduction of a peritoneovenous shunt and reinfusion of concentrated ascitic fluid techniques allows increased diuresis and improves renal function. However, these procedures have frequently been associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation and/or activation of fibrinolysis. Factor VIII activity, antigen and ristocetin cofactor, plasminogen, antiplasmin, plasminogen activator activity and plasmin-antiplasmin complex were investigated both in the ascitic fluid and plasma of cirrhotic patients before and after the concentration-reinfusion technique. Our results indicated that no hyperfibrinolysis was seen in the plasma of cirrhotic patients and that activation of fibrinolysis exists in ascites. Significantly higher levels of plasmin-antiplasmin complex and plasminogen activator activity were found in ascitic fluid than in plasma. In post-reinfusion much higher levels of all three Factor VIII components were observed in cirrhotic plasma than in normal plasma. In conclusion, activation of fibrinolysis could explain coagulation complications occurring after ascites reinfusion. Antifibrinolytic treatment could render the concentration-reinfusion technique more acceptable

Clotting changes in borderline hypertension.

Coagulation factors evaluated in a group of patients with borderline hypertension. The following tests were carried out: prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT), Factor VIII coagulant activity, Factor VIII antigen and Factor VIII ristocetin cofactor, Factor XII and Factor XI activities. These tests were selected for their relationship to the contact coagulative activation near the vascular wall. Comparing the results with those of normal controls, Factor VIII coagulant activity, Factor XII and PTT levels were significantly higher. Other tests were all within normal limits in both groups. High Factor VIII and Factor XII levels associated with PTT shortening suggest that an increased synthesis and/or release of these coagulation factors was present in our patients. Activated coagulation seems to be present in borderline hypertension before the appearance of clinical signs of vascular lesions

Combined heterozygous plasminogen deficiency and factor V Leiden defect in the same kindred

Combined plasminogen deficiency and resistance to activated protein C defect (factor V Leiden) have been described in a few families and associated with a variable occurrence of thrombotic events. Here we describe a new family with thrombophilia and the presence of hypoplasminogenemia and factor V Leiden mutation. In addition, a brief review of the literature is presented. Nine patients belonging to this kindred underwent coagulation study for hereditary thrombophilia, which included plasminogen antigen and activity assays, an activated protein C resistance test, and genetic analysis for factor V Leiden mutation and for prothrombin variant 20210A. The proposita, a 40-year-old asymptomatic female with a family history of thrombotic diathesis, was affected by heterozygous plasminogen deficiency. Hypoplasminogenemia was found also in her two sisters, in one instance associated with factor V Leiden mutation. The mother was the putative carrier of hypoplasminogenemia, but she refused to be studied. The symptomatic father was heterozygous for factor V Leiden mutation, but presented with normal plasminogen levels. Among the available siblings investigated from the paternal side, resistance to activated protein C due to factor V Leiden mutation was found in three patients, one of whom experienced venous thromboembolism. Another uncle with a history of thrombotic disease showed no coagulation abnormalities. These findings together with the data from literature confirm the role of factor V Leiden as an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism, whereas isolated hypoplasminogenemia does not seem to increase the risk for thrombosis. There is no clear evidence that the coinheritance of these two defects may be associated with an additional risk for thrombosis compared with the presence of factor V Leiden mutation alone