UNO per tutto: il cambiamento nel cambiamento

This presentation (at the ITALE -Italian Ex-libris Users Association- Spring Conference held in Milan, IULM University 22-5-2018) presents the Discovery-tool of the Genoa University "UNO per tutto" (PRIMO New UI - Exlibris): project perspectives, context analysis and new solutions aim to place users (and resources) at the heart of the catalog

Primo Total Care, Primo Direct e Primo VE – confronto sulle funzionalità del backoffice

In this presentation, held at the ITALE Seminar "The future is in the network: experiences and sharing strategies (Verona, 9-5-2019), the Primo TC / Primo VE discovery-tool (Ex-libris) back-office management is compared as experienced in Genoa University in the last year. In particular we focus on the lights and shadows of Primo VE in relation to local data inUNIMARC bibliographic forma

Open Access per l' accesso equo e sostenibile alla conoscenza

Presentazione data alla Scuola estiva IANUA Università di Genov

Primo VE e UNIMARC

Il seguente documento nasce nell’ambito delle attività svolte dal Gruppo di Lavoro ITALE (Associazione Italiana Utenti Ex Libris) dedicato ai Discovery Tools (è possibile consultare la lista dei membri nell’ultima pagina). Da giugno 2018 Primo VE è presentato alle installazioni italiane come un nuovo modello di implementazione, parallelo a Primo (Total Care o Direct). Alcune istituzioni italiane (Università di Genova, IULM) sono state coinvolte in un programma “early adopter” per analizzare le problematiche legate ad UNIMARC. Da fine 2018, in concomitanza con il passaggio ad Alma, altre istituzioni ITALE (Università dell’Insubria, Università di Verona, Università di Sassari, LIUC, Ospedale San Raffaele di Milano) sono entrate in produzione. Questo documento è stato predisposto per descrivere meglio le problematiche legate allo standard UNIMARC ed è stato approvato dalla 68. Assemblea dei Soci ITALE

questa è una prova per testare DSpace6

tt

Primo Total Care, Primo Direct e Primo VE \u2013 confronto sulle funzionalit\ue0 del backoffice: l'esperienza dell'Universit\ue0 di Genova

In questa presentazione, tenuta al Seminario ITALE "Il futuro \ue8 nella rete: esperienze e strategie di condivisione (Verona, 10-5-2019), si mettono a confronto la gestione back-office dei discovery-tool Primo TC / Primo VE (Ex-libris) come sperimentato nell dell'Universit\ue0 di Genova nell'ultimo anno. In particolare ci si sofferma su luci ed ombre di Primo VE in relazione ai dati locali nel formato bibliografico UNIMARCIn this presentation, held at the ITALE Seminar "The future is in the network: experiences and sharing strategies (Verona, 10-5-2019), the Primo TC / Primo VE discovery-tool (Ex-libris) back-office management is compared as experienced in Genoa University in the last year. In particular we focus on the lights and shadows of Primo VE in relation to local data inUNIMARC bibliographic forma

Prova per invio mail automatico

prov

Il Manuale per Formatori della Scienza Aperta

Introduzione ai principi generali della scienza apert

Stress Echocardiography in Italian Echocardiographic Laboratories: A Survey of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging

Background: The Italian Society of Echography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey to understand the volumes of activity, modalities and stressors used during stress echocardiography (SE) in Italy. Methods: We analyzed echocardiography laboratory activities over a month (November 2022). Data were retrieved through an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire, uploaded on the SIECVI website. Results: Data were obtained from 228 echocardiographic laboratories, and SE examinations were performed in 179 centers (80.6%): 87 centers (47.5%) were in the northern regions of Italy, 33 centers (18.4%) were in the central regions, and 61 (34.1%) in the southern regions. We annotated a total of 4057 SE. We divided the SE centers into three groups, according to the numbers of SE performed: <10 SE (low-volume activity, 40 centers), between 10 and 39 SE (moderate volume activity, 102 centers) and >= 40 SE (high volume activity, 37 centers). Dipyridamole was used in 139 centers (77.6%); exercise in 120 centers (67.0%); dobutamine in 153 centers (85.4%); pacing in 37 centers (21.1%); and adenosine in 7 centers (4.0%). We found a significant difference between the stressors used and volume of activity of the centers, with a progressive increase in the prevalence of number of stressors from low to high volume activity (P = 0.033). The traditional evaluation of regional wall motion of the left ventricle was performed in all centers, with combined assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in 90 centers (50.3%): there was a significant difference in the centers with different volume of SE activity: the incidence of analysis of CFVR was significantly higher in high volume centers compared to low - moderate - volume (32.5%, 41.0% and 73.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). The lung ultrasound (LUS) was assessed in 67 centers (37.4%). Furthermore for LUS, we found a significant difference in the centers with different volume of SE activity: significantly higher in high volume centers compared to low - moderate - volume (25.0%, 35.3% and 56.8%, respectively, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This nationwide survey demonstrated that SE was significantly widespread and practiced throughout Italy. In addition to the traditional indication to coronary artery disease based on regional wall motion analysis, other indications are emerging with an increase in the use of LUS and CFVR, especially in high-volume centers