UNO per tutto: il cambiamento nel cambiamento

This presentation (at the ITALE -Italian Ex-libris Users Association- Spring Conference held in Milan, IULM University 22-5-2018) presents the Discovery-tool of the Genoa University "UNO per tutto" (PRIMO New UI - Exlibris): project perspectives, context analysis and new solutions aim to place users (and resources) at the heart of the catalog

Primo Total Care, Primo Direct e Primo VE – confronto sulle funzionalità del backoffice

In this presentation, held at the ITALE Seminar "The future is in the network: experiences and sharing strategies (Verona, 9-5-2019), the Primo TC / Primo VE discovery-tool (Ex-libris) back-office management is compared as experienced in Genoa University in the last year. In particular we focus on the lights and shadows of Primo VE in relation to local data inUNIMARC bibliographic forma

Open Access per l' accesso equo e sostenibile alla conoscenza

Presentazione data alla Scuola estiva IANUA Università di Genov

Primo VE e UNIMARC

Il seguente documento nasce nell’ambito delle attività svolte dal Gruppo di Lavoro ITALE (Associazione Italiana Utenti Ex Libris) dedicato ai Discovery Tools (è possibile consultare la lista dei membri nell’ultima pagina). Da giugno 2018 Primo VE è presentato alle installazioni italiane come un nuovo modello di implementazione, parallelo a Primo (Total Care o Direct). Alcune istituzioni italiane (Università di Genova, IULM) sono state coinvolte in un programma “early adopter” per analizzare le problematiche legate ad UNIMARC. Da fine 2018, in concomitanza con il passaggio ad Alma, altre istituzioni ITALE (Università dell’Insubria, Università di Verona, Università di Sassari, LIUC, Ospedale San Raffaele di Milano) sono entrate in produzione. Questo documento è stato predisposto per descrivere meglio le problematiche legate allo standard UNIMARC ed è stato approvato dalla 68. Assemblea dei Soci ITALE

questa è una prova per testare DSpace6

tt

Primo Total Care, Primo Direct e Primo VE \u2013 confronto sulle funzionalit\ue0 del backoffice: l'esperienza dell'Universit\ue0 di Genova

In questa presentazione, tenuta al Seminario ITALE "Il futuro \ue8 nella rete: esperienze e strategie di condivisione (Verona, 10-5-2019), si mettono a confronto la gestione back-office dei discovery-tool Primo TC / Primo VE (Ex-libris) come sperimentato nell dell'Universit\ue0 di Genova nell'ultimo anno. In particolare ci si sofferma su luci ed ombre di Primo VE in relazione ai dati locali nel formato bibliografico UNIMARCIn this presentation, held at the ITALE Seminar "The future is in the network: experiences and sharing strategies (Verona, 10-5-2019), the Primo TC / Primo VE discovery-tool (Ex-libris) back-office management is compared as experienced in Genoa University in the last year. In particular we focus on the lights and shadows of Primo VE in relation to local data inUNIMARC bibliographic forma

Prova per invio mail automatico

prov

Il Manuale per Formatori della Scienza Aperta

Introduzione ai principi generali della scienza apert

Organization and Activity of Italian Echocardiographic Laboratories: A Survey of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging

Background: The Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey to understand better how different echocardiographic modalities are used and accessed in Italy. Methods: We analyzed echocardiography laboratory activities over a month (November 2022). Data were retrieved via an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire, uploaded on the SIECVI website. Results: Data were obtained from 228 echocardiographic laboratories: 112 centers (49%) in the northern, 43 centers (19%) in the central, and 73 (32%) in the southern regions. During the month of observation, we collected 101,050 transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examinations performed in all centers. As concern other modalities there were performed 5497 transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations in 161/228 centers (71%); 4057 stress echocardiography (SE) examinations in 179/228 centers (79%); and examinations with ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in 151/228 centers (66%). We did not find significant regional variations between the different modalities. The usage of picture archiving and communication system (PACS) was significantly higher in the northern (84%) versus central (49%) and southern (45%) centers (P < 0.001). Lung ultrasound (LUS) was performed in 154 centers (66%), without difference between cardiology and noncardiology centers. The evaluation of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was evaluated mainly using the qualitative method in 223 centers (94%), occasionally with the Simpson method in 193 centers (85%), and with selective use of the three-dimensional (3D) method in only 23 centers (10%). 3D TTE was present in 137 centers (70%), and 3D TEE in all centers where TEE was done (71%). The assessment of LV diastolic function was done routinely in 80% of the centers. Right ventricular function was evaluated using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion in all centers, using tricuspid valve annular systolic velocity by tissue Doppler imaging in 53% of the centers, and using fractional area change in 33% of the centers. When we divided into cardiology (179, 78%) and noncardiology (49, 22%) centers, we found significant differences in the SE (93% vs. 26%, P < 0.001), TEE (85% vs. 18%), UCA (67% vs. 43%, P < 0001), and STE (87% vs. 20%, P < 0.001). The incidence of LUS evaluation was similar between the cardiology and noncardiology centers (69% vs. 61%, P = NS). Conclusions: This nationwide survey demonstrated that digital infrastructures and advanced echocardiography modalities, such as 3D and STE, are widely available in Italy with a notable diffuse uptake of LUS in the core TTE examination, a suboptimal diffusion of PACS recording, and conservative use of UCA, 3D, and strain. There are significant differences between northern and central-southern regions and echocardiographic laboratories that pertain to the cardiac unit. This inhomogeneous distribution of technology represents one of the main issues that must be solved to standardize the practice of echocardiography