47 research outputs found

    b→sÎłb \rightarrow s \gamma and Ï”b\epsilon_b Constraints on Two Higgs Doublet Model

    Full text link
    We perform a combined analysis of two stringent constraints on the 2 Higgs doublet model, one coming from the recently announced CLEO II bound on B(b→sÎł)B(b \rightarrow s \gamma) and the other from the recent LEP data on Ï”b\epsilon_b. We have included one-loop vertex corrections to Z→bb‟Z \rightarrow b \overline b through Ï”b\epsilon_b in the model. We find that the new Ï”b\epsilon_b constraint excludes most of the less appealing window \tan\beta\lsim 1 at 90%90\%C.~L. for m_t=150\GeV. We also find that although b→sÎłb \rightarrow s \gamma constraint is stronger for tan⁥ÎČ>1\tan\beta>1, Ï”b\epsilon_b constraint is stronger for \tan\beta\lsim 1, and therefore these two are the strongest and complimentary constraints present in the charged Higgs sector of the model.Comment: LATEX, 9 Pages+1 Figure, the Figure available upon request as a Postscript file, CTP-TAMU-69/9

    Inclusion of Z->b b-bar vertex corrections in Precision Electroweak Tests on the Sp(6)_L X U(1)_Y Model

    Full text link
    We extend our previous work on the precision electroweak tests in the Sp(6)_L X U(1)_Y family model to include for the first time the important Z->b b-bar vertex corrections encoded in a new variable epsilon_b, utilizing all the latest LEP data. We include in our analysis the one loop EW radiative corrections due to the new bosons in terms of epsilon_1, epsilon_b and ΔΓZ\Delta\Gamma_Z. We find that the correlation between epsilon_1 and epsilon_b makes the combined constraint much stronger than the individual ones. The model is consistent with the recent CDF result of m_t=174\pm 10^{+13}_{-12}\GeV, but it can not accomodate m_t\gsim 195\GeV.Comment: Latex, 16 pages+4 figures(not included but available as uuencoded or PS files from [email protected]), PURD-TH-94-08, SNUTP-94-4

    Precision Electroweak Tests on the Sp(6)L×U(1)YSp(6)_L \times U(1)_Y Model

    Get PDF
    We perform precision electroweak tests on the Sp(6)L×U(1)YSp(6)_L \times U(1)_Y model. The purpose of the analysis is to delineate the model parameters such as the mixing angles of the extra gauge bosons present in this model. We find that the model is already constrained considerably by the present LEP data.Comment: 14 pages+2 figures(not included), PURD-TH-93-13, to appear in Phys. Rev. D(figures available upon request by regular mail

    Higgs Boson Mass Bounds in the Standard and Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with Four Generations

    Get PDF
    We study the question of distinguishability of the Higgs sector between the standard model with four generations(SM4) and the minimal supersymmetric standard model with four generations (MSSM4). We find that a gap exists between the SM4 and MSSM4 Higgs boson masses for a range of the fourth generation fermion mass considered in the analysis at a fixed top quark mass. We also compare the Higgs boson mass bounds in these models with those in the standard and the minimal supersymmetric standard models.Comment: 11 pages, Revtex, 3 postscript figures, accepted for publication in Mod. Phys. Lett.

    b→sÎłb\to s\gamma and Ï”1\epsilon_1 Constraints on Supergravity Models

    Full text link
    In the light of the top quark discovered very recently by CDF, we investigate the possibility of narrowing down the allowed top quark masses by combining for the first time only two strongest constraints present in the no-scale SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity model, namely, the ones from the flavor-changing radiative decay b→sÎłb\rightarrow s\gamma and the precision measurements at LEP in the form of Ï”1\epsilon_{1}. It turns out that even without including the most devastating constraint from \Zbb measurement at LEP in the form of RbR_b directly or Ï”b\epsilon_b indirectly, the combined constraint from b→sÎłb\rightarrow s\gamma and Ï”1\epsilon_1 alone in fact excludes m_t(m_t)\gsim 180\GeV altogether in the no-scale model, providing a constraint on mtm_t near the upper end of the CDF values. The resulting upper bound on mtm_t is stronger and 5 \GeV lower than the one from combining Ï”1\epsilon_1 and Ï”b\epsilon_b constraints and also combining b→sÎłb\rightarrow s\gamma and Ï”b\epsilon_b constraints in the previous analysis.Comment: To appear in Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 12 Pages(LaTeX)+2 Figures (not included). The PS figures are available upon request from the author as a uuencoded file or a hard cop

    Implications of the Recent Top Quark Discovery on Two Higgs Doublet Model

    Get PDF
    Concentrating on the impact of the very recent top quark discovery, we perform a combined analysis of two strongest constraints on the 2 Higgs doublet model, one coming from the recent measurement by CLEO on the inclusive branching ratio of b->s \gamma decay and the other from the recent LEP data on Z->b b-bar decay. We have included the model predictions for one-loop vertex corrections to Z->b b-bar through ϔb\epsilon_b. We find that the ϔb\epsilon_b constraint excludes most of the less appealing window \tan\beta\lsim 1 at 95% C.L. for the measured top mass from CDF, mt=176+/- 8+/-10 GeV. Moreover, it excludes \tan\beta\lsim 2 at 95% C.L. for mt>176 GeV. Combining with the b->s \gamma constraint, only very heavy charged Higgs (>670 GeV) is allowed by the measured mt from CDF.Comment: To appear in Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 10 Pages(LaTeX)+1 Figure (not included). The PS figure is available upon request from the author as a file or a hard cop

    New Precision Electroweak Tests in Supergravity Models

    Get PDF
    We update the analysis of the precision electroweak tests in terms of 4 epsilon parameters, Ï”1,2,3,b\epsilon_{1,2,3,b}, to obtain more accurate experimental values of them by taking into account the new LEP data released at the 28th ICHEP (1996, Poland). We also compute Ï”1\epsilon_1 and Ï”b\epsilon_b in the context of the no-scale SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity model to obtain the updated constraints by imposing the correlated constraints in terms of the experimental ellipses in the Ï”1−ϔb\epsilon_1-\epsilon_b plane and also by imposing the new bound on the lightest chargino mass, mχ1±≳79m_{\chi^\pm_1}\gtrsim 79 GeV GeV. Upon imposing these new experimental results, we find that the situations in the no-scale model are much more favorable than those in the standard model, and if mt≳170m_t\gtrsim 170 GeV GeV, then the allowed regions at the 95% C.~L. in the no-scale model are tan⁥ÎČ≳4\tan\beta\gtrsim 4 and mχ1±â‰Č120(82)m_{\chi^\pm_1}\lesssim 120 (82) GeV GeV for ÎŒ>0(ÎŒ<0)\mu>0 (\mu<0), which are in fact much more stringent than in our previous analysis. Therefore, assuming that mt≳170m_t\gtrsim 170 GeV GeV, if the lightest chargino mass bound were to be pushed up only by a few GeV, the sign on the Higgs mixing term ÎŒ\mu in the no-scale model could well be determined from the Ï”1−ϔb\epsilon_1-\epsilon_b constraint to be positive at the 95% C.~L. At any rate, better accuracy in the measured mtm_t from the Tevatron in the near future combined with the LEP data is most likely to provide a decisive test of the no-scale SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity model.Comment: 15 pages, REVTEX, 1 figure (not included but available as a ps file from [email protected]

    New Precision Electroweak Tests of SU(5) x U(1) Supergravity

    Full text link
    We explore the one-loop electroweak radiative corrections in SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity via explicit calculation of vacuum-polarization and vertex-correction contributions to the Ï”1\epsilon_1 and Ï”b\epsilon_b parameters. Experimentally, these parameters are obtained from a global fit to the set of observables Γl,Γb,AFBl\Gamma_{l}, \Gamma_{b}, A^{l}_{FB}, and MW/MZM_W/M_Z. We include q2q^2-dependent effects, which induce a large systematic negative shift on Ï”1\epsilon_{1} for light chargino masses (m_{\chi^\pm_1}\lsim70\GeV). The (non-oblique) supersymmetric vertex corrections to \Zbb, which define the Ï”b\epsilon_b parameter, show a significant positive shift for light chargino masses, which for tan⁥ÎČ≈2\tan\beta\approx2 can be nearly compensated by a negative shift from the charged Higgs contribution. We conclude that at the 90\%CL, for m_t\lsim160\GeV the present experimental values of Ï”1\epsilon_1 and Ï”b\epsilon_b do not constrain in any way SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity in both no-scale and dilaton scenarios. On the other hand, for m_t\gsim160\GeV the constraints on the parameter space become increasingly stricter. We demonstrate this trend with a study of the m_t=170\GeV case, where only a small region of parameter space, with \tan\beta\gsim4, remains allowed and corresponds to light chargino masses (m_{\chi^\pm_1}\lsim70\GeV). Thus SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity combined with high-precision LEP data would suggest the presence of light charginos if the top quark is not detected at the Tevatron.Comment: LaTeX, 11 Pages+4 Figures(not included), the figures available upon request as an uuencoded file(0.4MB) or 4 PS files from [email protected], CERN-TH.7078/93, CTP-TAMU-68/93, ACT-24/9

    Probing Supergravity Models with Indirect Experimental Signatures

    Get PDF
    We explore the one-loop electroweak radiative corrections in the context of the traditional minimal SU(5)SU(5) and the string-inspired SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity models by calculating explicitly vacuum-polarization and vertex-correction contributions to the Ï”1\epsilon_1 and Ï”b\epsilon_b parameters. We also include in this analysis the constraint from b→sÎłb\rightarrow s\gamma whose inclusive branching ratio B(b→sÎł)B(b\rightarrow s\gamma) has been actually measured very recently by CLEO. We find that by combining these three most important indirect experimental signatures and using the most recent experimental values for them, mt≳170GeVm_t\gtrsim 170 {\rm GeV} is excluded for ÎŒ>0\mu>0 in both the minimal SU(5)SU(5) supergravity and the no-scale SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity. We also find that mt≳175(185)GeVm_t\gtrsim 175(185) {\rm GeV} is excluded for any sign of ÎŒ\mu in the minimal (SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1)) supergravity model.Comment: RevTeX 3.0, 16 Pages+4 figures(not included but available as a uuencoded file from [email protected]), SNUTP-94-9

    Precision Electroweak Tests of the Minimal and Flipped SU(5) Supergravity Models

    Full text link
    We explore the one-loop electroweak radiative corrections in the minimal SU(5)SU(5) and the no-scale flipped SU(5)SU(5) supergravity models via explicit calculation of vacuum polarization contributions to the ϔ1,2,3\epsilon_{1,2,3} parameters. Experimentally, ϔ1,2,3\epsilon_{1,2,3} are obtained from a global fit to the LEP observables, and MW/MZM_W/M_Z measurements. We include q2q^2-dependent effects which have been neglected in most previous ``model-independent" analyses of this type. These effects induce a large systematic negative shift on ϔ1,2,3\epsilon_{1,2,3} for light chargino masses (m_{\chi^\pm_1}\lsim70\GeV). In agreement with previous general arguments, we find that for increasingly large sparticle masses, the heavy sector of both models rapidly decouples, \ie, the values for ϔ1,2,3\epsilon_{1,2,3} quickly asymptote to the Standard Model values with a {\it light} Higgs (m_{H_{SM}}\sim100\GeV). Specifically, at present the 90%90\% CL upper limit on the top-quark mass is m_t\lsim175\GeV in the no-scale flipped SU(5)SU(5) supergravity model. These bounds can be strengthened for increasing chargino masses in the 50-100\GeV interval. In particular, for m_t\gsim160\GeV, the Tevatron may be able to probe through gluino(g~\tilde g) and squark(q~\tilde q) production up to m_{\tilde g}\approx m_{\tilde q}\approx250\GeV, exploring at least half of the parameter space in this model.Comment: 15 pages,(6 ps figures available upon request), TeX(harvmac), CTP-TAMU-19/93, ACT-07/9
    corecore