Area under immunosurveillance: dedicated roles of memory CD8 T-cell subsets

Immunological memory, defined as the ability to respond in an enhanced manner upon secondary encounter with the same pathogen, can provide substantial protection against infectious disease. The improved protection is mediated in part by different populations of memory CD8 T cells that are retained after primary infection. Memory cells persist in the absence of pathogen-derived antigens and enable secondary CD8 T-cell responses with accelerated kinetics and of larger magnitude after reencounter with the same pathogen. At least three subsets of memory T cells have been defined that are referred to as central memory CD8 T cells (Tcm), effector memory CD8 T cells (Tem), and tissue-resident memory CD8 T cells (Trm). Tcm and Tem are circulating memory T cells that mediate bodywide immune surveillance in search of invading pathogens. In contrast, Trm permanently reside in peripheral barrier tissues, where they form a stationary defensive line of sentinels that alert the immune system upon pathogen reencounter. The characterization of these different subsets has been instrumental in our understanding of the strategies that memory T cells employ to counter invading pathogens. It is clear that memory T cells not only have a numerical advantage over naive T cells resulting in improved protection in secondary responses, but also acquire distinct sets of competencies that assist in pathogen clearance. Nevertheless, inherent challenges are associated with the allocation of memory T cells to a limited number of subsets. The classification of memory T cells into Tcm, Tem, and Trm may not take into account the full extent of the heterogeneity that is observed in the memory population. Therefore, in this review, we will revisit the current classification of memory subsets, elaborate on functional and migratory properties attributed to Tcm, Tem, and Trm, and discuss how potential heterogeneity within these populations arises and persists

Tissue-resident memory T cells in the urogenital tract

Our understanding of T cell memory responses changed drastically with the discovery that specialized T cell memory populations reside within peripheral tissues at key pathogen entry sites. These tissue-resident memory T (TRM) cells can respond promptly to an infection without the need for migration, proliferation or differentiation. This rapid and local deployment of effector functions maximizes the ability of TRM cells to eliminate pathogens. TRM cells do not circulate through peripheral tissues but instead form isolated populations in the skin, gut, liver, kidneys, the reproductive tract and other organs. This long-term retention in the periphery might allow TRM cells to fully adapt to the local conditions of their environment and mount customized responses to counter infection and tumour growth in a tissue-specific manner. In the urogenital tract, TRM cells must adapt to a unique microenvironment to confer protection against potential threats, including cancer and infection, while preventing the onset of auto-inflammatory disease. In this Review, we discuss insights into the diversification of TRM cells from other memory T cell lineages, the adaptations of TRM cells to their local environment, and their enhanced capacity to counter infection and tumour growth compared with other memory T cell populations, especially in the urogenital tract

Hobit and Blimp-1 instruct the differentiation of iNKT cells into resident-phenotype lymphocytes after lineage commitment

iNKT cells are CD1d-restricted T cells that play a pro-inflammatory or regulatory role in infectious and autoimmune diseases. Thymic precursors of iNKT cells eventually develop into distinct iNKT1, iNKT2, and iNKT17 lineages in the periphery. It remains unclear whether iNKT cells retain developmental potential after lineage commitment. iNKT cells acquire a similar phenotype as tissue-resident memory T cells, suggesting that they also differentiate along a trajectory that enables them to persist in peripheral tissues. Here, we addressed whether lineage commitment and memory differentiation are parallel or sequential developmental programs of iNKT cells. We defined three subsets of peripheral iNKT cells using CD62L and CD69 expression that separate central, effector, and resident memory phenotype cells. The majority of iNKT1 cells displayed a resident phenotype in contrast to iNKT2 and iNKT17 cells. The transcription factor Hobit, which is upregulated in iNKT cells, plays an essential role in their development together with its homolog Blimp-1. Hobit and Blimp-1 instructed the differentiation of central memory iNKT cells into resident memory iNKT cells, but did not impact commitment into iNKT1, iNKT2, or iNKT17 lineages. Thus, we conclude that memory differentiation and the establishment of residency occur after lineage commitment through a Hobit and Blimp-1-driven transcriptional program

Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells shape local and systemic secondary T cell responses

Tissue-resident memory CD8+ T cells (TRM cells) are crucial in protecting against reinvading pathogens, but the impact of reinfection on their tissue confinement and contribution to recall responses is unclear. We developed a unique lineage tracer mouse model exploiting the TRM-defining transcription factor homolog of Blimp-1 in T cells (Hobit) to fate map the TRM progeny in secondary responses. After reinfection, a sizeable fraction of secondary memory T cells in the circulation developed downstream of TRM cells. These tissue-experienced ex-TRM cells shared phenotypic properties with the effector memory T cell population but were transcriptionally and functionally distinct from other secondary effector memory T cell cells. Adoptive transfer experiments of TRM cells corroborated their potential to form circulating effector and memory cells during recall responses. Moreover, specific ablation of primary TRM cell populations substantially impaired the secondary T cell response, both locally and systemically. Thus, TRM cells retain developmental plasticity and shape both local and systemic T cell responses on reinfection

Hobit and Blimp-1 regulate TRM abundance after LCMV infection by suppressing tissue exit pathways of TRMprecursors

Tissue-resident memory T cells (Trm) are retained in peripheral tissues after infection for enhanced protection against secondary encounter with the same pathogen. We have previously shown that the transcription factor Hobit and its homolog Blimp-1 drive Trm development after viral infection, but how and when these transcription factors mediate Trm formation remains poorly understood. In particular, the major impact of Blimp-1 in regulating several aspects of effector T-cell differentiation impairs study of its specific role in Trm development. Here, we used the restricted expression of Hobit in the Trm lineage to develop mice with a conditional deletion of Blimp-1 in Trm, allowing us to specifically investigate the role of both transcription factors in Trm differentiation. We found that Hobit and Blimp-1 were required for the upregulation of CD69 and suppression of CCR7 and S1PR1 on virus-specific Trm precursors after LCMV infection, underlining a role in their retention within tissues. The early impact of Hobit and Blimp-1 favored Trm formation and prevented the development of circulating memory T cells. Thus, our findings highlight a role of Hobit and Blimp-1 at the branching point of circulating and resident memory lineages by suppressing tissue egress of Trm precursors early during infection

Hobit- and Blimp-1-driven CD4+ tissue-resident memory T cells control chronic intestinal inflammation

Although tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM cells) have been shown to regulate host protection in infectious disorders, their function in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains to be investigated. Here we characterized TRM cells in human IBD and in experimental models of intestinal inflammation. Pro-inflammatory TRM cells accumulated in the mucosa of patients with IBD, and the presence of CD4+CD69+CD103+ TRM cells was predictive of the development of flares. In vivo, functional impairment of TRM cells in mice with double knockout of the TRM-cell-associated transcription factors Hobit and Blimp-1 attenuated disease in several models of colitis, due to impaired cross-talk between the adaptive and innate immune system. Finally, depletion of TRM cells led to a suppression of colitis activity. Together, our data demonstrate a central role for TRM cells in the pathogenesis of chronic intestinal inflammation and suggest that these cells could be targets for future therapeutic approaches in IBD

Author Correction: Hobit- and Blimp-1-driven CD4+ tissue-resident memory T cells control chronic intestinal inflammation (Nature Immunology, (2019), 20, 3, (288-300), 10.1038/s41590-018-0298-5)

In the version of this article initially published, a portion of the Acknowledgements section (“the Clinical Research Group CEDER of the German Research Council (DFG)”) was incorrect. The correct statement is as follows: “..the Collaborative Research Center TRR241 of the German Research Council (DFG)..”. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF version of the article

PD-L1 siRNA-mediated silencing in acute myeloid leukemia enhances anti-leukemic T cell reactivity

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an immune-susceptible malignancy, as demonstrated by its responsiveness to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). However, by employing inhibitory signaling pathways, including PD-1/PD-L1, leukemia cells suppress T cell-mediated immune attack. Notably, impressive clinical efficacy has been obtained with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies in cancer patients. Yet, these systemic treatments are often accompanied by severe toxicity, especially after alloSCT. Here, we investigated RNA interference technology as an alternative strategy to locally interfere with PD-1/PD-L1 signaling in AML. We demonstrated efficient siRNA-mediated PD-L1 silencing in HL-60 and patients' AML cells. Importantly, WT1-antigen T cell receptor(+) PD-1(+) 2D3 cells showed increased activation toward PD-L1 silenced WT1(+) AML. Moreover, PD-L1 silenced AML cells significantly enhanced the activation, degranulation, and IFN-γ production of minor histocompatibility antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells. Notably, PD-L1 silencing was equally effective as PD-1 antibody blockade. Together, our study demonstrates that PD-L1 silencing may be an effective strategy to augment AML immune-susceptibility. This provides rationale for further development of targeted approaches to locally interfere with immune escape mechanisms in AML, thereby minimizing severe toxicity. In combination with alloSCT and/or adoptive T cell transfer, this strategy could be very appealing to boost graft-versus-leukemia immunity and improve outcome in AML patients