Endometrial Carcinoma Presenting as Vasculitic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy

Paraneoplastic syndromes (PNS) are a heterogeneous group of symptoms which are indirectly caused by primary or metastatic tumor. Paraneoplastic polyneuropathy (PNP) is mostly related to small cell lung cancer (5%), prostate, gastric, and breast cancer. Only sporadic cases have been reported to be associated with endometrial cancer. We present a case of a premenopausal woman with severe vasculitic, asymmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy that developed in conjunction with an endometrial carcinoma responding to surgical therapy of primary tumor combined to steroid therapy. Neurological symptoms such as asymmetrical sensorimotor deficits and painful paresthesias are suspicious when they occur in otherwise healthy women with no medical history. The phenomenon of a paraneoplastic syndrome can point to an underlying malignancy and can be used as marker of progression or regression of the tumor. Due to the rarity of PNP, there is no standard treatment. Recommended therapy is stage-adjusted treatment of the primary tumor

Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study:Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair

Efforts to use traditional native tissue strategies and reduce the use of meshes have been made in several countries. Combining native tissue repair with sufficient mesh applied apical repair might provide a means of effective treatment. The study group did perform and publish a randomized trial focusing on the combination of traditional native tissue repair with pectopexy or sacrocolpopexy and observed no severe or hitherto unknown risks for patients (Noé G.K. J Endourol 2015;29(2):210–215). The short-term follow-up of this international multicenter study carried out now is presented in this article. Material and Methods: Eleven clinics and 13 surgeons in four European counties participated in the trial. In order to ensure a standardized approach and obtain comparable data, all surgeons were obliged to follow a standardized approach for pectopexy, focusing on the area of fixation and the use of a prefabricated mesh (PVDF PRP 3 × 15 Dynamesh). The mesh was solely used for apical repair. All other clinically relevant defects were treated with native tissue repair. Colposuspension or TVT were used for the treatment of incontinence. Data were collected independently for 14 months on a secured server; 501 surgeries were registered and evaluated. Two hundred and sixty-four patients out of 479 (55.1%) returned for the physical examination and interview after 12–18 months. Main Outcome and Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 15 months. The overall success of apical repair was rated positively by 96.9%, and the satisfaction score was rated positively by 95.5%. A positive general recommendation was expressed by 95.1% of patients. Pelvic pressure was reduced in 95.2%, pain in 98.0%, and urgency in 86.0% of patients. No major complications, mesh exposure, or mesh complication occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusion: In clinical routine, pectopexy and concomitant surgery, mainly using native tissue approaches, resulted in high satisfaction rates and favorable clinical findings. The procedure may also be recommended for use by general urogynecological practitioners with experience in laparoscopy

Comparison of survival of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel node biopsy alone or systematic lymphadenectomy

Background Recently, sentinel lymph node mapping was introduced in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer as alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy. However, the survival impact of sentinel node mapping is not well characterized yet. Methods We performed retrospective study of 104 patients with endometrial cancer treated with sentinel lymph node alone (n = 52) or with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n = 52). For sentinel node mapping, indocyanine green was used. The outcome measure was disease-free survival. Results Median follow-up was 42 months. Fifty-two patients staged by sentinel lymph node mapping were matched in 1:1 ratio with 52 patients staged by lymphadenectomy using patient age, histological type, tumor stage, tumor grade and lymph and vascular space invasion as matching criteria. The median number of removed lymph node was 3 (range 1-6) and 36 (13-63) in the sentinel and lymphadenectomy group, respectively. The rate of lymph node metastases was not significantly higher in the sentinel group (19.2%) in comparison with the lymphadenectomy group (14.3%). The overall detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 100% with a bilateral mapping of 98.1%. Most of the 152 lymph nodes identified and removed were localized in upper paracervical pathway (n = 143, 94.1%). During the follow-up period, overall 21 (20.2%) events were observed, 8 (15.4%) in the sentinel group and 13 (25.0%) in the lymphadenectomy group. The estimated disease-free survival was 84.6% and 75.0% for patients in the sentinel and lymphadenectomy groups, respectively. The survival curves demonstrated similar disease-free survival in two groups (p = 0.774). Conclusion Sentinel lymph node mapping did not compromise the outcome of patients with endometrial cancer