1 research outputs found
Applicability evaluation of mtDNA based molecular identification in mosquito species/subspecies/biotypes collected from Thessaloniki, Greece
The genus Culex, containing many described species, plays a role as a vector for diseases of medical and veterinary importance worldwide. Among these species, Culex pipiens is one of the most widespread mosquitoes and is classified into two biological forms (biotypes), named as Culex pipiens pipiens and Culex pipiens molestus. Due to similar morphological structure between these biotypes, morphological identification is inadequate. Thus, molecular methods have been developed and are considered more reliable, some of which are based on analyses of mitochondrial DNA. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the applicability and reliability of mtDNA based molecular identification methodologies. Initially, mosquito specimens (n = 100) collected from Thessaloniki, Greece were morphologically analyzed. Then, mitochondrial cox1 sequencing and PCR-RFLP methods were used to confirm the morphological identification results as well as to discriminate species and subspecies/biotype of Culex pipiens complex. According to morphological identification results, Culex pipiens complex (n = 92), Culex modestus (n = 6) and Culex theileri (n = 2) were detected. Using mtDNA sequencing, all Culex modestus and Culex theileri samples were confirmed whereas 86 of Culex pipiens complex were detected as Culex pipiens but surprisingly the remaining six of them were detected as Culex quinquefasciatus. Among Culex pipiens specimens, PCR-RFLP detected that frequency of Culex pipiens pipiens (85%; 85/100) was very high compared to Culex pipiens molestus (1%, 1/100). In conclusion, this study shows the necessity of use of molecular methods beside morphological methods for especially specimens detected as Culex pipiens. Also, it was shown that mtDNA PCR-RFLP methodology represents a well-established alternative for Culex biotypes identification. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.The authors would like to thank USDA-ARS EBCL personnel for facilitation with sample collections