Evaluation of Swallow Function in Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia: A Retrospective Study

Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is characterized by underdevelopment of the structures derived from the first and second pharyngeal arches resulting in aesthetic, psychological, and functional problems including feeding and swallowing difficulties. The aim of this study is to gain more insight into swallowing difficulties in patients with CFM. A retrospective study was conducted in the population of patients diagnosed with CFM at three major craniofacial units. Patients with feeding difficulties and those who underwent video fluoroscopic swallow (VFS) studies were included for further analyses. The outcome of the VFS-studies was reviewed with regard to the four phases of swallowing. In our cohort, 13.5% of the 755 patients were diagnosed with swallowing difficulties. The outcome of the VFS-studies of 42 patients showed difficulties in the oral and pharyngeal phases with both thin and thick liquids. Patients with more severe mandibular hypoplasia showed more difficulties to form an appropriate bolus compared to patients who were less severely affected. This is the first study to document swallowing problems in patients with CFM. Difficulties were seen in both the oral and pharyngeal phases. We recommend routine screening for swallowing issues by a speech and language therapist in all patients with CFM and to obtain a VFS-study in patients with a type III mandible

Is There a Difference in Orbital Volume Between Affected and Unaffected Sides in Patients With Unilateral Craniofacial Microsomia?

PURPOSE: Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is characterized by malformations of structures derived from the first and second pharyngeal arches. The orbit is variably affected. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in orbital volume between affected and unaffected sides in patients with unilateral CFM. The specific aims were to 1) measure orbital volume, 2) compare affected and unaffected sides, 3) evaluate the correlation between clinical evaluation of orbital size and volumetric measurement, and 4) determine whether there is a correlation between orbital volume and severity of mandibular deformity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective case series of patients with unilateral CFM from Boston Children's Hospital (Boston, MA) who had a computed tomographic (CT) scan. Manual segmentation of the orbit using Mimics software (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) was performed on CT images of the 2 orbits. The predictor variable was laterality (affected vs unaffected side) and the primary outcome variable was orbital volume. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare these measurements and determine whether the affected side differed from the unaffected side. The correlation between orbital volume and Pruzansky-Kaban type of mandibular deformity, as documented in the medical record, was determined using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included. Orbital volume was 10% smaller on the affected side (P = .001) in 80% of patients. There was no correlation between orbital size and severity of mandibular involvement. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed a marked difference in orbital volume between affected and unaffected sides in patients with unilateral CFM. These differences were small and might not be clinically relevant. Orbital volume did not correlate with severity of mandibular deformity