A Randomized Trial of Pharmacogenetic Warfarin Dosing in Naive Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Genotype-guided warfarin dosing have been proposed to improve patient's management. This study is aimed to determine whether a CYP2C9- VKORC1- CYP4F2-based pharmacogenetic algorithm is superior to a standard, clinically adopted, pharmacodynamic method. Two-hundred naive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were randomized to trial arms and 180 completed the study. No significant differences were found in the number of out-of-range INRs (INR3.0) (p = 0.79) and in the mean percentage of time spent in the therapeutic range (TTR) after 19 days in the pharmacogenetic (51.9%) and in the control arm (53.2%, p = 0.71). The percentage of time spent at INR>4.0 was significantly lower in the pharmacogenetic (0.7%) than in the control arm (1.8%) (p = 0.02). Genotype-guided warfarin dosing is not superior in overall anticoagulation control when compared to accurate clinical standard of care

Antiphospholipid syndrome and the heart: A case series and literature review

Antiphospholipid syndrome is a rare autoimmune disease characterised by a high tendency of developing thrombotic events. It is diagnosed in the presence of specific laboratory criteria (positivity for lupus anticoagulant, and the presence of anticardiolipin and a\u3b22GPI antibodies) and clinical criteria such as thrombosis in any district (arterial or venous) and pregnancy morbidity. Being a multisystem disease, heart is commonly affected by direct (autoimmune mediated action) or indirect (thrombosis) pathological mechanisms. Heart valve lesions are the most frequent manifestations; however, the haemodynamic significance is quite uncommon but when it occurs it may require surgery that further complicates the picture due to the high risk of thrombosis. Coronary arteries and myocardium are also affected leading to ischaemic heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Other findings include chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and accelerated atherosclerosis. The consequences of heart involvement may be significant in overt disease. The treatment of cardiac complications is challenging and requires an in depth knowledge of the disease

The Paradox of the Lupus Anticoagulant: History and Perspectives

A unique coagulation inhibitor prolonging whole-blood clotting time was described more than 50 years ago in two patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The immunoglobulin nature of the inhibitor and its interaction with antiphospholipid antibodies was later demonstrated and the term \u201clupus anticoagulant (LA)\u201d was coined to describe this laboratory finding. It soon became apparent that LA was a misnomer as it is often found in plasma from patients with clinical conditions other than SLE and is associated with thromboembolic events that may occur in otherwise healthy individuals. Individuals with LA have circulating autoantibodies that inhibits blood coagulation. These are mostly of IgG or IgM class and mainly directed against a phospholipid (PL)-binding plasma protein, \u3b22-glycoprotein I (\u3b22GPI). The presence of \u3b22GPI-dependent LA represents a well-recognized risk factor for venous and arterial thromboembolism, as well as pregnancy loss and morbidity. \u3b22GPI-dependent LA in the presence of documented previous thromboembolism, or history of pregnancy loss/morbidity, identifies definite anti-PL syndrome. Laboratory diagnosis of LA is thus of particular importance, as it may assign patients with a common event (thrombosis) to a group with a high risk for recurrence, which is a prerequisite for long-term oral antithrombotic treatment

Laboratory Diagnostics of Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) lies in the recognition of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). As standardization of tests for the detection of aPL is far from being optimal and reference material is not available, inappropriate diagnoses of APS are not unusual. In the last few years, the concept of triple test positivity has emerged as a useful tool to identify patients with APS. Clinical studies on patients and carriers of triple positivity clearly show that these individuals are at high risk of thromboembolic events and pregnancy loss. Moreover, triple positivity arises from a single (probably pathogenic) antibody directed to domain 1 of \u3b22-glycoprotein I, a protein whose function is still unknown. Studies on homogenous group of patients with single or double positivity are scant, and uncertainties arise on their association with clinical events. Promising but undetermined results come also from the determination of antibodies directed to phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex. Interpretation of laboratory profile in APS is challenging, and the collaboration between clinical pathologists and clinicians is highly desirable

Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: Rationale and design of the Trial on Rivaroxaban in AntiPhospholipid Syndrome (TRAPS) trial

Background New oral anticoagulants may simplify long-term therapy in conditions requiring anticoagulation. Rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been extensively studied and is now approved for the prevention and therapy of a number of thromboembolic conditions. Objective and methods This is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, study that will evaluate if Rivaroxaban 20 mg od (or 15 mg od in patients with moderate renal insufficiency) is non-inferior to warfarin (INR target 2.5), for the prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding and death in high risk (triple positive) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Secondary endpoints will assess the incidence of any individual component of the composite end point. An external adjudication committee will evaluate all suspected outcome events. This will be a unique trial, as it will enrol the biggest homogenous cohort of high risk APS individuals. Conclusion The methods and the study design should be appropriate to achieve study results that are both scientifically valid and relevant to clinical practice. </jats:sec

Correct laboratory approach to APS diagnosis and monitoring

Triple positivity (positive Lupus Anticoagulant, anticardiolipin and anti \u3b22-glycoptrotein I antibodies) identifies the pathogenic autoantibody (anti Domain I of \u3b22-glycoptroteinI) that is present in patients with definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). This is supported by the fact that a\u3b22GPI antibodies obtained by affinity purification in these patients possess LA activity. Moreover, patients and carriers of this profile carry a much higher risk of thrombosis and pregnancy loss than APS patients with positivity for only one of the tests. Thus, very different risk categories exist among patients with APS as well as among carriers of aPL. Clinical studies and interventional trials should first take these high risk subjects into consideration. Copyright \ua9 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Minimizing the risk of hemorrhagic stroke during anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation

none7Introduction: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is given for ischemic stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. OAC’s most serious complications are major bleeding and, in particular, hemorrhagic stroke. Together with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are now available which have a more rapid onset/offset of action and more predictable anticoagulant effect. The advent of DOAC has given to the clinician an opportunity to tailor OAC therapy in order to maximize advantages and minimize complications. Areas covered: This review covers data published in literature regarding the risk of hemorrhagic stroke in patients taking OAC. Bleeding risk assessment is discussed and different bleeding risk factors are presented. The paper will also review clinical studies comparing DOAC against standard anticoagulation, in regard to the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. Expert opinion: Bleeding assessment is mandatory in order to select patients at high hemorrhagic risk who will benefit the most from close monitoring. Blood pressure, alcohol intake, concomitant medication and comorbidities should be constantly evaluated and treated accordingly. During VKA therapy, adherence and intensity of anticoagulation must be strictly monitored. DOAC are associated with lower risk of hemorrhagic stroke than VKA. However, periodic hepatic and renal checks as well as careful evaluation of time adherence are necessary to reduce the risk of bleeding.noneGiacomo Zoppellaro;Serena Granziera;Seena Padayattil Jose;Gentian Denas;Alessia Bracco;Sabino Iliceto;Vittorio PengoZoppellaro, Giacomo; Granziera, Serena; PADAYATTIL JOSE, Seena; Denas, Gentian; Bracco, Alessia; Iliceto, Sabino; Pengo, Vittori

A Bridging Protocol in High-Thrombotic Risk Mechanical Valve Bearers Undergoing Surgery or Invasive Procedures

none8nononeDenas, Gentian; Testa, Sophie; Quintavalla, Roberto; Guazzaloca, Giuliana; Padayattil Jose, Seena; Zoppellaro, Giacomo; Bracco, Alessia; Pengo, VittorioDenas, Gentian; Testa, Sophie; Quintavalla, Roberto; Guazzaloca, Giuliana; PADAYATTIL JOSE, Seena; Zoppellaro, Giacomo; Bracco, Alessia; Pengo, Vittori