1,435 research outputs found
On the period of the linear congruential and power generators
We consider the periods of the linear congruential and the power generators
modulo and, for fixed choices of initial parameters, give lower bounds that
hold for ``most'' when ranges over three different sets: the set of
primes, the set of products of two primes (of similar size), and the set of all
integers. For most in these sets, the period is at least
for any monotone function tending to zero
as tends to infinity. Assuming the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis, for most
in these sets the period is greater than for any . Moreover, the period is unconditionally greater than , for
some fixed , for a positive proportion of in the above mentioned
sets. These bounds are related to lower bounds on the multiplicative order of
an integer modulo , modulo , and modulo
where range over the primes, ranges over the integers, and where
is the order of the largest cyclic subgroup of .Comment: 20 pages. One of the quoted results (Theorem 23 in the previous
version) is stated for any unbounded monotone function psi(x), but it appears
that the proof only supports the case when psi(x) is increasing rather
slowly. As a workaround, we provide a modified version of Theorem 23, and
change the argument in the proof of Theorem 27 (Theorem 25 in the previous
version
The iterated Carmichael \lambda-function and the number of cycles of the power generator
Iteration of the modular l-th power function f(x) = x^l (mod n) provides a
common pseudorandom number generator (known as the Blum-Blum-Shub generator
when l=2). The period of this pseudorandom number generator is closely related
to \lambda(\lambda(n)), where \lambda(n) denotes Carmichael's function, namely
the maximal multiplicative order of any integer modulo n. In this paper, we
show that for almost all n, the size of \lambda(\lambda(n)) is
n/exp((1+o(1))(log log n)^2 log log log n). We conjecture an analogous formula
for the k-th iterate of \lambda. We deduce that for almost all n, the
psuedorandom number generator described above has at least exp((1+o(1))(log log
n)^2 log log log n) disjoint cycles. In addition, we show that this expression
is accurate for almost all n under the assumption of the Generalized Riemann
Hypothesis for Kummerian fields. We also consider the number of iterations of
\lambda it takes to reduce an integer n to 1, proving that this number is less
than (1+o(1))(log log n)/log 2 infinitely often and speculating that log log n
is the true order of magnitude almost always.Comment: 28 page
Primitive sets with large counting functions
A set of positive integers is said to be primitive if no element of the set
is a multiple of another. If is a primitive set and is the number of
elements of not exceeding , then a result of Erd\H os implies that
converges. We establish an approximate
converse to this theorem, showing that if satisfies some mild conditions
and converges, then there exists a
primitive set with .Comment: 7 pages. Revision includes a strengthening of Theorem 1: an upper
bound for S(x) of the same order of magnitude as the lower bound is now
establishe
Squarefree smooth numbers and Euclidean prime generators
We show that for each prime p > 7, every residue mod p can be represented by
a squarefree number with largest prime factor at most p. We give two
applications to recursive prime generators akin to the one Euclid used to prove
the infinitude of primes.Comment: 8 pages, to appear in Proceedings of the AM
Deterministic elliptic curve primality proving for a special sequence of numbers
We give a deterministic algorithm that very quickly proves the primality or
compositeness of the integers N in a certain sequence, using an elliptic curve
E/Q with complex multiplication by the ring of integers of Q(sqrt(-7)). The
algorithm uses O(log N) arithmetic operations in the ring Z/NZ, implying a bit
complexity that is quasi-quadratic in log N. Notably, neither of the classical
"N-1" or "N+1" primality tests apply to the integers in our sequence. We
discuss how this algorithm may be applied, in combination with sieving
techniques, to efficiently search for very large primes. This has allowed us to
prove the primality of several integers with more than 100,000 decimal digits,
the largest of which has more than a million bits in its binary representation.
At the time it was found, it was the largest proven prime N for which no
significant partial factorization of N-1 or N+1 is known.Comment: 16 pages, corrected a minor sign error in 5.
- …