Lead in wine: a case study on two varieties at two wineries in South Australia

Sources of lead in wine were inferred from systematic assay of grapes must and wine, during winemaking. Two Australian wineries were monitored during the 1994 vintage with respect to vinification of Riesling and Shiraz. Juice and wine samples were collected at several process stages from crushing through to bottling, and were analysed for their total lead concentration by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Selected samples were subsequently analysed for lead isotope ratio (fingerprinting method) to infer possible sources of lead in samples. Lead concentration in fermenting must was found to vary during vinification. In particular, lead concentration increased significantly in open-top vessels, in holding bins and during pressing. Juice and wine stored in concrete or waxed wood also had a significantly higher concentration of lead compared to juice or wine stored in stainless steel. Moreover, fining with bentonite or filtering with diatomaceous earth contributed further to final lead concentration, while fermentation, both primary and secondary, removed lead. Overall, wines processed via these different systems still contained only traces of lead, and generally less than 30 μg/L (30 micrograms per litre). These trace levels are of no concern to human health when such wines are consumed in moderation.Stockley, Creina S.; Smith, Lester H.; Tiller, The Late Kevin G.; Gulson, Brian L.; Osborn, Chester D' A.; Lee, Terry H

Preventing protein haze in bottled white wine

Slow denaturation of wine proteins is thought to lead to protein aggregation, flocculation into a hazy suspension and formation of precipitates. The majority of wine proteins responsible for haze are grapederived, have low isoelectric points and molecular weight. They are grape pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins that are expressed throughout the ripening period post véraison, and are highly resistant to low pH and enzymatic or non-enzymatic proteolysis. Protein levels in un-fined white wine differ by variety and range up to 300 mg/L. Infection with some common grapevine pathogens or skin contact, such as occurs during transport of mechanically harvested fruit, results in enhanced concentrations of some PR proteins in juice and wine. Oenological control of protein instability is achieved through adsorption of wine proteins onto bentonite. The adsorption of proteins onto bentonite occurs within several minutes, suggesting that a continuous contacting process could be developed. The addition of proteolytic enzyme during short term heat exposure, to induce PR protein denaturation, showed promise as an alternative to bentonite fining. The addition of haze-protective factors, yeast mannoproteins, to wines results in decreased particle size of haze, probably by competition with wine proteins for other non-proteinaceous wine components required for the formation of large insoluble aggregations of protein. Other wine components likely to influence haze formation are ethanol concentration, pH, metal ions and phenolic compounds.E.J. Waters, G. Alexander, R. Muhlack, K.F. Pocock, C. Colby, B.K. O'Neill, P.B. Høp and P. Jone