Limits on νμ(νˉμ)→ντ(νˉτ)\nu_\mu(\bar{\nu}_\mu)\to\nu_\tau(\bar{\nu}_\tau) and νμ(νˉμ)→νe(νˉe)\nu_\mu(\bar{\nu}_\mu)\to\nu_e(\bar{\nu}_e) Oscillations from a Precision Measurement of Neutrino-Nucleon Neutral Current Interactions

We present limits on $\nu_\mu(\bar{\nu}_\mu)\to\nu_\tau(\bar{\nu}_\tau)$ and $\nu_\mu(\bar{\nu}_\mu)\to\nu_e(\bar{\nu}_e)$ oscillations based on a study of inclusive $\nu N$ interactions performed using the CCFR massive coarse grained detector in the FNAL Tevatron Quadrupole Triplet neutrino beam. The sensitivity to oscillations is from the difference in the longitudinal energy deposition pattern of $\nu_\mu N$ versus $\nu_\tau N$ or $\nu_e N$ charged current interactions. The $\nu_\mu$ energies ranged from 30 to 500 GeV with a mean of 140 GeV. The minimum and maximum $\nu_\mu$ flight lengths are 0.9 km and 1.4 km respectively. For $\nu_\mu\to\nu_\tau$ oscillations, the lowest 90% confidence upper limit in $\sin^22\alpha$ of $2.7\times 10^{-3}$ is obtained at $\Delta m^2\sim50$~eV$^2$. This result is the most stringent limit to date for $25<\Delta m^2<90$ eV$^2$. For $\nu_\mu\to\nu_e$ oscillations, the lowest 90% confidence upper limit in $\sin^22\alpha$ of $1.9\times 10^{-3}$ is obtained at $\Delta m^2\sim350$~eV$^2$. This result is the most stringent limit to date for $250<\Delta m^2<450$ eV$^2$, and also excludes at 90% confidence much of the high $\Delta m^2$ region favored by the recent LSND observation.Comment: Revised version contains limit on $\nu_\mu\to\nu_e$ oscillations as well as limit on $\nu_\mu\to\nu_\tau$ oscillations found in original. 15 pages, ReVTeX, 3 figures in uuencoded file, submitted to PR

Volunteering and its relationship with personal and neighborhood well-being

Although a relationship between volunteering and well-being has been demonstrated in numerous studies, well-being has generally been poorly operationalized and often defined by the relative absence of pathology. In this study, the authors take a positive approach to defining well-being and investigate the relationship between volunteering and personal and neighborhood well-being. The theoretical approach incorporates elements of the homeostatic model of well-being. A sample of 1,289 adults across Australia completed a questionnaire that assessed personal and neighborhood wellbeing, personality factors, and the psychosocial resources implicated in the homeostatic model of well-being. Analyses reveal that volunteers had higher personal and neighborhood well-being than nonvolunteers and that volunteering contributed additional variance in well-being even after psychosocial and personality factors were accounted for. The findings are discussed in terms of previous research and the homeostatic model of well-being, and it is argued that the relationship between volunteering and well-being is robust.<br /