9 research outputs found
Changes in Perioperative Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy during the COVID-19 Era.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic presented patients with barriers to receiving healthcare. We sought to determine whether changes in healthcare access and practice during the pandemic affected perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy (RAPL).
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 721 consecutive patients who underwent RAPL. With March 1
RESULTS: COVID-19-Era patients had significantly higher preoperative FEV1%, lower cumulative smoking history and higher incidences of preoperative atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and bleeding disorders compared to PreCOVID-19 patients. COVID-19-Era patients had lower intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), reduced incidence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), but higher incidence of effusion or empyema postoperatively. Overall postoperative complication rates between the groups were similar. Older age, increased EBL, lower preoperative FEV1%, and preoperative COPD are all predictive of an increased risk for postoperative complication.
CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-Era patients having lower EBL and less new-onset POAF, despite greater incidences of multiple preoperative comorbidities, demonstrates that RAPL is safe during the COVID-19 era. Risk factors for development of postoperative effusion should be determined to minimize risk of empyema in COVID-19-Era patients. Age, preoperative FEV1%, COPD, and EBL should all be considered when planning for complication risk
A High Preoperative Blood Urea Nitrogen to Serum Albumin Ratio Does Not Predict Worse Outcomes Following the Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy for Lung Cancer.
BACKGROUND: The blood urea nitrogen to serum albumin ratio (BAR) is an emerging prognostic parameter of interest. The utility of BAR as a prognostic factor has not been analyzed in lung cancer patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy. We evaluated the ability of High BAR to predict worse outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy (RAPL) for lung cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 400 patients who underwent RAPL from September 2010 to March 2022 by one surgeon. Patients were stratified by Low BAR (
RESULTS: Receiver operator curves (ROC) confirmed that 6.25 was an optimal threshold for estimating mortality based on Low and High BAR. There were no differences in surgical complications or outcomes between the Low and High BAR groups. The ability of BAR to predict 30-day mortality was evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC) analysis, which showed that higher BAR could not predict mortality (AUC=0.655; 95% CI, 0.435-0.875;
CONCLUSION: High BAR did not predict worse outcomes after RAPL for lung cancer in our study. Further studies are needed to better determine the prognostic ability of BAR in lower-risk populations
Changes in Perioperative Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy during the COVID-19 Era
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic presented patients with barriers to receiving healthcare. We sought to determine whether changes in healthcare access and practice during the pandemic affected perioperative outcomes after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy (RAPL). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 721 consecutive patients who underwent RAPL. With March 1st, 2020, defining the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, we grouped 638 patients as âPreCOVID-19â and 83 patients as âCOVID-19-Eraâ based on surgical date. Demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, intraoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. Variables were compared utilizing Student's t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Chi-square (or Fisher's exact) test, with significance at pâ€0.05. Multivariable generalized linear regression was used to investigate predictors of postoperative complication. Results: COVID-19-Era patients had significantly higher preoperative FEV1%, lower cumulative smoking history and higher incidences of preoperative atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and bleeding disorders compared to PreCOVID-19 patients. COVID-19-Era patients had lower intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), reduced incidence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), but higher incidence of effusion or empyema postoperatively. Overall postoperative complication rates between the groups were similar. Older age, increased EBL, lower preoperative FEV1%, and preoperative COPD are all predictive of an increased risk for postoperative complication. Conclusions: COVID-19-Era patients having lower EBL and less new-onset POAF, despite greater incidences of multiple preoperative comorbidities, demonstrates that RAPL is safe during the COVID-19 era. Risk factors for development of postoperative effusion should be determined to minimize risk of empyema in COVID-19-Era patients. Age, preoperative FEV1%, COPD, and EBL should all be considered when planning for complication risk
Residential Distance to the Cancer Center and Outcomes after Robotic-Assisted Pulmonary Lobectomy
ABSTRACT: Background: Outcomes of lung cancer patients traveling greater distances for surgical oncology care are not well-described. We investigated the effects of increased travel burden after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy (RAPL) for lung cancer. Methods: Clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of 711 consecutive patients who underwent RAPL from September 2010 to March 2022 were compared, stratified by primary residential ZIP code <160 km or â„160 km from the cancer center. Results: Of 711 study patients, 515 (72.4%) lived within 160 km and 196 (27.6%) lived â„160 km away. There were no differences in Charlson Comorbidity Index scores or tumor characteristics. Those traveling â„160 km experienced more unfavorable perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications, and had worse median survival time by 1.68 years, but this survival difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: With the growing centralization of cancer care, travel burden may emerge as a predictor of surgical oncology outcomes