Indications and Outcomes of Helicopter Rescue Missions in Alpine Mountain Huts: A Retrospective Study.

Pasquier, Mathieu, Louis Marxer, Hervé Duplain, Vincent Frochaux, Florence Selz, Pierre Métrailler, Grégoire Zen Ruffinen, and Olivier Hugli. Indications and outcomes of helicopter rescue missions in alpine mountain huts: A retrospective study. High Alt Med Biol 18:355-362, 2017. This retrospective study describes the rescue indications and outcome of patients rescued by helicopter from mountain huts in the Swiss Alps. The hospital course and operational data were also studied. Among 14,872 helicopter rescue missions undertaken during the 10-year study period, 309 (2.1%) were performed from mountain huts at a mean altitude of 2794 ± 459 m. The mean age of the patients was 43 ± 16 and 66% were male. Thirty-four percent of the patients had a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics score ≥3. Most (89%) patients were transported to hospital and only 12 (3.9%) patients had to stay more than 48 hours. Hospital diagnoses were extremely varied. Trauma accounted for 50% and altitude diseases for 7% of the cases. A winching procedure was performed 18 times and 19 missions included a night flight. Helicopter rescue missions in mountain huts are a small part of all rescue missions. Our study provides a better understanding of medical emergencies arising in mountain huts. The diagnoses encountered are extremely varied in their type and severity. Hut keepers should be prepared for these situations as they will often have to act as first responders in the case of medical problems

A rationalist perspective on the autonomy of international sport governing bodies : towards a pragmatic autonomy in the steering of sports

International sport governing bodies (ISGBs) are built on the foundations of freedom of association and traditionally enjoy a large degree of autonomy in their decision-making. Their autonomy is increasingly confined, however, and their hierarchical self-governance is giving way to a more networked governance, in which different stakeholders exert power in different ways and in different contexts in a complex web of interrelationships. Taking a rationalist perspective on the autonomy of ISGBs, this article demonstrates that ISGBs are deploying strategies to safeguard their waning governing monopoly over international sport. Opting for an inductive approach, the authors present four possible conceptualizations of autonomy as applied to ISGBs, namely political autonomy, legal autonomy, financial autonomy and pyramidal autonomy. For each dimension, they describe the different strategies ISGBs wield in order to safeguard different dimensions of their autonomy. This article uses governance theories to hypothesize that the autonomy of ISGBs can be understood as 'pragmatic autonomy' since ISGBs only cede certain aspects of their autonomy under particular circumstances and when being subject to specific threats. Acting in a rationalist manner, they are able to keep control over governance developments in sport by using indirect and more subtle forms of governance