Duchenne's/Becker's muscular dystrophy: Analysis of genotype-feno-type correlation in 28 patients

Duchenne's and Becker's muscular dystrophy (DMD & BMD) is a X linked disease caused by mutations in the dystrophic gene. DMD is the malign form of the disease, which significantly shortens the lifetime of the patient, while BMD has late onset with slow progression. Sixty five percent of DMD and BMD cases are caused by deletion of one or more exons in the dystrophic gene, while duplications cause these diseases in 6 to 7% of the cases. There are two hot spots for deletions and duplications. These are exons in the proximal part of the gene (3rd to 18th) and exons of a distal part of the gene (45th to 52nd). The remaining 30% of DMD and BMD cases are caused by point mutations, small deletions or inversions in the dystrophic gene. The correlation between School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade the severity of the disease and the position of deletion shows that most of the out of frame deletions cause DMD phenotype, while in frame deletions result in BMD pheno-type. We report on the results of 28 non-related DMD and BMD patients. In 57% of cases deletions were detected and all were found in the distal hot spot of the gene. These results suggest that in most of the cases, out of frame deletions produce DMD phenotype while in frame deletions result in BMD phenotype. This is in compliance with data from literature

Analysis of mutations in 17p 11.2 region in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1 disease and patients with tomaculose neuropathy

Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1Α disease (CMT1A) and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) are common inherited disorders of the peripheral nervous system associated with duplication and deletion respectively, of the 17p11.2 segment including the gene of peripheral myelin protein 22. We studied 48 subjects belonging to 29 families with clinical and electrophysiological signs of definite CMT1, 20 patients with suspected CMT phenotype, and 17 patients and healthy members of their families with HNPP. Blood sampling and DNA isolation, PCR, restriction analysis, southern blotting were performed using standard procedures. Of 48 patients with diagnosis of definite CMT1 in 25 (52%) we found a 1.5 Mb tandem duplication in chromosome 17p11.2. These duplications were not found in any of 20 sporadic cases with the clinical phenotype of CMT but without reliable electrophysiological data. Only 13 (44.8%)of 29 unrelated CMT1 patients from the first group had 17p11.2 duplications. Three of 4 sporadic cases (75%) with definite CMT1 had 17p11.2 duplications. Of 17 patients from 6 families with HNPP deletion of 17p11.2 segment was found in 15 (88.2%), as well as in 5 (83.3%) of six unrelated cases. Detection of CMT1A/HNPP recombination hotspot is a simple and reliable DNA diagnostic method, which is useful only for the patients with clinically already verified CMT1, and HNPP for further genetic counseling of patients and members of their families

Why Is the Duration of Erythema Migrans at Diagnosis Longer in Patients with Lyme Neuroborreliosis Than in Those without Neurologic Involvement?

In prior studies, the skin lesion erythema migrans (EM) was present for a longer time period before diagnosis of concomitant borrelial meningoradiculoneuritis (Bannwarth’s syndrome) compared to EM patients without neurologic symptoms. To determine if this observation pertains to other manifestations of Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB), we compared EM characteristics in patients with borrelial meningoradiculoneuritis (n = 122) to those with aseptic meningitis without radicular pain (n = 72 patients), and to patients with EM but without neurologic involvement (n = 12,384). We also assessed factors that might impact duration. We found that the duration of EM at diagnosis in patients with borrelial meningoradiculoneuritis was not significantly different compared with those with LNB without radicular pain (34 vs. 26 days; p = 0.227). The duration of EM for each of these clinical presentations of LNB, however, was significantly longer than in patients with EM without LNB (10 days; p < 0.001). Contributing factors to this difference might have been that patients with LNB failed to recognize that they had EM or were unaware of the importance of not delaying antibiotic treatment for EM. In conclusion, the duration of the EM skin lesion in EM patients with LNB is longer than in patients with just EM, irrespective of the type of LNB