5 research outputs found

    Parameterized Edge Hamiltonicity

    Full text link
    We study the parameterized complexity of the classical Edge Hamiltonian Path problem and give several fixed-parameter tractability results. First, we settle an open question of Demaine et al. by showing that Edge Hamiltonian Path is FPT parameterized by vertex cover, and that it also admits a cubic kernel. We then show fixed-parameter tractability even for a generalization of the problem to arbitrary hypergraphs, parameterized by the size of a (supplied) hitting set. We also consider the problem parameterized by treewidth or clique-width. Surprisingly, we show that the problem is FPT for both of these standard parameters, in contrast to its vertex version, which is W-hard for clique-width. Our technique, which may be of independent interest, relies on a structural characterization of clique-width in terms of treewidth and complete bipartite subgraphs due to Gurski and Wanke

    Maximizing Happiness in Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width

    Full text link
    Clique-width is one of the most important parameters that describes structural complexity of a graph. Probably, only treewidth is more studied graph width parameter. In this paper we study how clique-width influences the complexity of the Maximum Happy Vertices (MHV) and Maximum Happy Edges (MHE) problems. We answer a question of Choudhari and Reddy '18 about parameterization by the distance to threshold graphs by showing that MHE is NP-complete on threshold graphs. Hence, it is not even in XP when parameterized by clique-width, since threshold graphs have clique-width at most two. As a complement for this result we provide a nO(cw)n^{\mathcal{O}(\ell \cdot \operatorname{cw})} algorithm for MHE, where \ell is the number of colors and cw\operatorname{cw} is the clique-width of the input graph. We also construct an FPT algorithm for MHV with running time O((+1)O(cw))\mathcal{O}^*((\ell+1)^{\mathcal{O}(\operatorname{cw})}), where \ell is the number of colors in the input. Additionally, we show O(n2)\mathcal{O}(\ell n^2) algorithm for MHV on interval graphs.Comment: Accepted to LATIN 202

    Unit Contact Representations of Grid Subgraphs with Regular Polytopes in 2D and 3D

    No full text
    We present a strategy to construct unit proper contact representations (UPCR) for subgraphs of certain highly symmetric grids. This strategy can be applied to obtain graphs admitting UPCRs with squares and cubes, whose recognition is NP-complete. We show that subgraphs of the square grid allow for UPCR with squares which strengthens the previously known cube representation. Indeed, we give UPCR for subgraphs of a d-dimensional grid with d-cubes. Additionally, we show that subgraphs of the triangular grid admit a UPCR with cubes, implying that the same holds for each subgraph of an Archimedean grid. Considering further polygons, we construct UPCR with regular 3k-gons of the hexagonal grid and UPCR with regular 4k-gons of the square grid

    Are Crossings Important for Drawing Large Graphs?

    No full text
    Abstract. Reducing the number of edge crossings is considered one of the most important graph drawing aesthetics. While real-world graphs tend to be large and dense, most of the earlier work on evaluating the impact of edge crossings utilizes relatively small graphs that are manually generated and manipulated. We study the effect on task performance of increased edge crossings in automatically generated layouts for graphs, from different datasets, with different sizes, and with different densities. The results indicate that increasing the number of crossings negatively impacts accuracy and performance time and that impact is significant for small graphs but not significant for large graphs. We also quantitatively evaluate the impact of edge crossings on crossing angles and stress in automatically constructed graph layouts. We find a moderate correlation between minimizing stress and the minimizing the number of crossings.
    corecore