56 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Differential investment in twin offspring by female pronghorns (Antilocapra americana)
Differential investment in offspring has been reported for many mammals, often in the context of the Trivers–
Willard model of male-biased investment, but evidence of differential investment in pronghorns (Antilocapra
americana) is largely lacking. We assessed the causes and consequences of different birth masses of littermate
fawns in a pronghorn population in Oregon. The mass differential for co-twins ranged from 0% to 89% (median
¼8.35%). Male-biased investment explained the mass differential in opposite-sex litters but not same-sex litters.
The mass differential did not result from mothers producing 1 normal-size fawn and 1 runt fawn, and the smaller
fawn was not deficient in physiological condition. Only 29% of fawns survived to 8 weeks and both fawns died
in 56% of litters, but co-twin mortalities were largely separate events. Mass did not confer a survival advantage
when considering all fawns through age 8 weeks, but there was evidence of such an advantage when comparing
fawns within litters before age 18 days. Differential investment in fawns might be a bet-hedging strategy in
which the mother accepts a lower expected reproductive success in exchange for a lower variance, but neither the
mean nor the variance differed between mothers of different-size (.8.35% mass differential) and similar-size
(,8.35%) litters. In fact, there was evidence of increased reproductive success for mothers of different-size
litters, much of which stemmed from higher survival 4–6 days after birth. Having different-size fawns reduced
the chances of sequential mortality, in which a predator killed one fawn then returned to kill the other.Keywords: Maternal investment, Sex-biased investment, Fawn survival, Antilocapra americana, Bet hedging, Win–stay strategy, Pronghorn, Body mas
Subtle Alterations in PCNA-Partner Interactions Severely Impair DNA Replication and Repair
Dynamic switching of PCNA-partner interactions is essential for normal DNA replication and repair in yeast
Competition of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerases I, II and III with DNA Pol IV in Stressed Cells
Escherichia coli has five DNA polymerases, one of which, the low-fidelity Pol IV or DinB, is required for stress-induced mutagenesis in the well-studied Lac frameshift-reversion assay. Although normally present at ∼200 molecules per cell, Pol IV is recruited to acts of DNA double-strand-break repair, and causes mutagenesis, only when at least two cellular stress responses are activated: the SOS DNA-damage response, which upregulates DinB ∼10-fold, and the RpoS-controlled general-stress response, which upregulates Pol IV about 2-fold. DNA Pol III was also implicated but its role in mutagenesis was unclear. We sought in vivo evidence on the presence and interactions of multiple DNA polymerases during stress-induced mutagenesis. Using multiply mutant strains, we provide evidence of competition of DNA Pols I, II and III with Pol IV, implying that they are all present at sites of stress-induced mutagenesis. Previous data indicate that Pol V is also present. We show that the interactions of Pols I, II and III with Pol IV result neither from, first, induction of the SOS response when particular DNA polymerases are removed, nor second, from proofreading of DNA Pol IV errors by the editing functions of Pol I or Pol III. Third, we provide evidence that Pol III itself does not assist with but rather inhibits Pol IV-dependent mutagenesis. The data support the remaining hypothesis that during the acts of DNA double-strand-break (DSB) repair, shown previously to underlie stress-induced mutagenesis in the Lac system, there is competition of DNA polymerases I, II and III with DNA Pol IV for action at the primer terminus. Up-regulation of Pol IV, and possibly other stress-response-controlled factor(s), tilt the competition in favor of error-prone Pol IV at the expense of more accurate polymerases, thus producing stress-induced mutations. This mutagenesis assay reveals the DNA polymerases operating in DSB repair during stress and also provides a sensitive indicator for DNA polymerase competition and choice in vivo
Blunt impacts to the back: Biomechanical response for model development
The development of advanced injury prediction models requires biomechanical and injury tolerance information for all regions of the body. While numerous studies have investigated injury mechanics of the thorax under frontal impact, there remains a dearth of information on the injury mechanics of the torso under blunt impact to the back. A series of hub-impact tests were performed to the back surface of the mid-thorax of four mid-size male cadavers. Repeated tests were performed to characterize the biomechanical and injury response of the thorax under various impact speeds (1.5m/s, 3m/s and 5.5m/s). Deformation of the chest was recorded with a 59-gage chestband. Subject kinematics were also recorded with a high-speed optoelectronic 3D motion capture system. In the highest-severity tests, peak impact forces ranged from 6.9 to 10.5kN. The peak change in extension angle measured between the 1st thoracic vertebra and the lumbar spine ranged from 39 to 62°. The most commonly observed injuries were strains of the costovertebral/costotransverse joint complexes, rib fractures, and strains of the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments. The majority of the rib fractures occurred in the rib neck between the costovertebral and costotransverse joints. The prevalence of rib-neck fractures suggests a novel, indirect loading mechanism resulting from bending moments generated in the rib necks caused by motion of the spine. In addition to the injury information, the biomechanical responses quantified here will facilitate the future development and validation of human body models for predicting injury risk during impact to the back
Organizational Change and The Human Resource Challenges in Facing Technology Development
- …