The Ki-67 proliferation index predicts recurrence-free survival in patients with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is an uncommon soft tissue sarcoma that originates from the dermis or subcutaneous tissue in the skin. While its prognosis is generally favorable, disease recurrence is relatively frequent. Because morbidity after repeated surgery may be significant, an optimized prediction of recurrence-free survival (RFS) has the potential to improve current management strategies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the Ki-67 proliferation index with respect to RFS in patients with DFSP. We retrospectively analyzed data from 45 patients with DFSP. We calculated the Ki-67 proliferation index as the percentage of immunostained nuclei among the total number of tumor cell nuclei regardless of the intensity of immunostaining. We constructed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify predictors of RFS. Among the 45 patients included in the study, 8 developed local recurrences and 2 had lung metastases (median follow-up: 95.0 months; range: 5.2−412.4 months). The RFS rates at 60, 120, and 240 months of follow-up were 83.8%, 76.2%, and 65.3%, respectively. The median Ki-67 proliferation index was 14%. Notably, we identified the Ki-67 proliferation index as the only independent predictor for RFS in multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (hazard ratio = 1.106, 95% confidence interval = 1.019−1.200, p = 0.016). In summary, our results highlight the potential usefulness of the Ki-67 proliferation index for facilitating the identification of patients with DFSP at higher risk of developing disease recurrences

Why do some patients with stage 1A and 1B endometrial endometrioid carcinoma experience recurrence? A retrospective study in search of prognostic factors

Objectives: Endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) is the most encountered subtype of endometrial cancer (EC). Our study aimed to investigate the factors affecting recurrence in patients with stage 1A and 1B EEC. Material and methods: Our study included 284 patients diagnosed with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage 1A/1B EEC in our center from 2010 to 2018. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were obtained retrospectively from their electronic files. Results: The median age of the patients was 60 years (range 31–89). The median follow-up time of the patients was 63.6 months (range 3.3–185.6). Twenty-two (7.74%) patients relapsed during follow-up. Among the relapsed patients, 59.1% were at stage 1A ECC, and 40.9% were at stage 1B. In our study, the one-, three-, and five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 98.9%, 95.4%, and 92.9%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, grade and tumor size were found to be independent parameters of RFS in all stage 1 EEC patients. Furthermore, the Ki-67 index was found to affect RFS in stage 1A EEC patients, and tumor grade affected RFS in stage 1B EEC patients. In the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the statistically significant cut-off values were determined for tumor size and Ki-67 index in stage 1 EEC patients. Conclusions: Stage 1-EEC patients in the higher risk group in terms of tumor size, Ki-67, and grade should be closely monitored for recurrence. Defining the prognostic factors for recurrence in stage 1 EEC patients may lead to changes in follow-up algorithms

The impact of Ki-67 index, squamous differentiation, and several clinicopathologic parameters on the recurrence of low and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer

Endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) represents approximately 75-80% of endometrial carcinoma cases. Three hundred and thirty-six patients with EEC followed-up in the authors’ medical center between 2010 and 2018 were included in our study. Two hundred and seventy-two low and intermediate EEC patients were identified using the European Society for Medical Oncology criteria and confirmed by histopathological examination. Recurrence was reported in 17 of these patients. The study group consisted of patients with relapse. A control group of 51 patients was formed at a ratio of 3:1 according to age, stage, and grade, similar to that in the study group. Of the 17 patients with recurrent disease, 13 patients (76.5%) were Stage 1A, and 4 patients (23.5%) were Stage 1B. No significant difference was found in age, stage, and grade between the case and control groups (p > 0.05). Body mass index, parity, tumor size, lower uterine segment involvement, SqD, and Ki-67 index with p<0.25 in the univariate logistic regression analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Ki-67 was statistically significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.018); however, there was no statistical significance in SqD and other parameters. Our data suggest that the Ki-67 index rather than SqD needs to be assessed for recurrence in patients with low- and intermediate-risk EEC

Histopathological Features Predicting Neuroendocrine Morphology in Primary Breast Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis

Objective: Neuroendocrine neoplasms of primary breast tumors are rare compared to locations, such as the respiratory system and gastrointestinal system, where they are frequently observed. The diagnostic criteria for primary neuroendocrine tumors of the breast have been changed since first description. Morphological and immunohistochemical features helpful in their diagnosis, which vary due to the heterogeneous nature of these tumors, are highlighted in this retrospective study. The purpose was to determine specific histopathological features that can identify neuroendocrine morphology in primary breast tumors. Materials and Methods: Cases diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma from resection materials in a single center between 2011 and 2022 and in which neuroendocrine markers were investigated were included. Demographic information, initial histopathological diagnosis, presence of tumor in another organ, tumor location, size and surgical details of the cases were obtained from the hospital database and pathology reports. The slides were re-evaluated in terms of tumor growth pattern, cribriformity, tubule formation, nuclear features, prominence of nucleoli, palisading and basal location of nuclei, presence of grooves, cytoplasmic features and evidence of cytoplasmic border. Results: The presence of basally located nuclei, absence of tubule formation, inconspicuous nucleoli, fine nuclear chromatin, granular cytoplasm and inconspicuous cytoplasmic borders were frequent findings in tumors with neuroendocrine features (p<0.05). These features may help differentiate primary breast tumors with neuroendocrine features from other breast carcinomas. Conclusion: The histopathological features that are different from the specific features seen in classical neuroendocrine tumors, the absence of specific clinical and radiological findings, the inability to study neuroendocrine markers in every laboratory and the need to prove that the breast tumor is not a metastasis all create diagnostic difficulties for primary breast neuroendocrine neoplasms. We believe that the results of this study may help diagnose and identify more specific histomorphological features that help determine neuroendocrine morphology in primary breast tumors