40 research outputs found

    Business process reengineering effectiveness evaluation using CVP analysis

    No full text
    ΠΠΊΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ исслСдования опрСдСляСтся ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² инструмСнтах ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ эффСктивности бизнСса. Одним ΠΈΠ· Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΡ… инструмСнтов являСтся Ρ€Π΅ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π³ бизнСс-процСссов. Он ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΠ΅Ρ‚ΡΡ, ΠΊΠΎΠ³Π΄Π° Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½ΡΡ‚ΡŒ обоснованноС Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅ΡΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ: Ρ€Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… прСобразованиях, рСструктуризации бизнСса, Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡ‚Π²ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… структур управлСния Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€. ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡΡ‚ΠΈΠ΅, стрСмящССся Π²Ρ‹ΠΆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡƒΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΡˆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ своС ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° Ρ€Ρ‹Π½ΠΊΠ΅, Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½ΠΎ постоянно ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΡΡ‚Π²ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ…Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ производства ΠΈ способы ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Ρ… процСссов. Но Ρ€Π΅ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π³ Π½Π° прСдприятиях Π½Π΅ всСгда ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ продуктивности Π΄Π΅ΡΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ обуславливаСт Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ эффСктивности. ЦСль Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ состоит Π² ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ пСрспСктивности использования CVP-ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΊ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ эффСктивности Ρ€Π΅ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π³Π° бизнСс-процСссов. ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹ исслСдования: абстракция, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·, синтСз, ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅, систСмный ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ…ΠΎΠ΄, графичСский ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄. Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ΠžΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ Π±ΡƒΠ΄ΡƒΡ‚ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡ‚ΡŒΡΡ основаниСм для принятия Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π³Π΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ бизнСс- процСсса ΠΈ построСнии ΠΈΡ… очСрСдности. К Π½ΠΈΠΌ относятся: Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ бизнСс-процСсса, Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ, Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ ΡΡ‚ΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ провСдСния ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ бизнСс-процСсса. Π˜Π·ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ стандартныС ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ, оцСнивая ΡΡ„Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ€Π΅ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π³Π° бизнСс-процСссов. ΠŸΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½Ρ‹ возмоТности примСнСния CVP-ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΊ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ Ρ‡Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π· ΠΎΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ влияния ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅ΠΈΠ½ΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ€ΠΈΠ½Π³Π° Π½Π° ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ эффСктивности Π΄Π΅ΡΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ.The relevance of the research is determined by the requirement of the companies for instruments of increasein business performance. One of such tools is business process reengineering. It is used when it is necessary tomake justified decision on activity reorganization: radical transformations, business restructuring and replacementof the operating management structures on new ones. The enterprise aiming to survive or improve the market position shall enhance constantly production technologies and methods of business process organization. But the reengineering performed at the entities, not always leads to increase in productivity of company activity that causes need of its efficiency assessment. The main aim of the study is to determine using CVP method prospects to business process reengineering effectiveness evaluation. Methods: abstraction, analysis, synthesis, modeling, system approach, graphic approach. Results. The authors have determinedthe criteria, which will be the basis for decision making about reengineering of each separate business process and creation of their priority. These methods are importance of business process, its problematicity, opportunity and cost of carrying out changes of business process. The authors studied the standard methods which can be applied to business process reengineering effectiveness evaluation. The paper demonstrates the possibilities of using CVP method for this evaluation through determination of the carried-out reengineering influence on general performance indicators of company activity

    MR diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tracking in spinal cord compression.

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal cord damage can result in major functional disability. Alteration of the spinal cord structural integrity can be assessed by using diffusion tensor imaging methods. Our objective is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA), and fiber tracking in both acute and slowly progressive spinal cord compressions. METHODS: Fifteen patients with clinical symptoms of acute (n = 2) or slowly progressive (n = 13) spinal cord compression and 11 healthy volunteers were prospectively selected. We performed T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) and diffusion tensor imaging by using a 1.5-T MR scanner. ADC and FA maps were computed. Regions of interest were placed at the cervical, upper and lower thoracic cord levels for the healthy subjects and on the area with abnormal T2-weighted signal intensity in the patients with cord compression. In three patients, we used fiber tracking to locate the areas of cord compression precisely. Data were analyzed by using a mixed model. The sensitivity (SE) and specificity (sp) of imaging (T2, ADC, and FA maps) in the detection of spinal cord abnormality were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: For the healthy subjects, averaged ADC values ranged from 0.96 10(-3) mm(2)/s to 1.05 10(-3) mm(2)/s and averaged FA values ranged from 0.745 to 0.751. Ten patients had decreased FA (0.67 +/- 0.087), and one had increased FA values (0.831); only two patients had increased ADC values (1.03 +/- 0.177). There was a statistically significant difference in the FA values between volunteers and patients (P = .012). FA had a much higher sensitivity (SE = 73.3%) and specificity (sp = 100%) in spinal cord abnormalities detection compared with T2-weighted FSE imaging (se = 46.7%, sp = 100%) and ADC (SE = 13.4%, sp = 80%). CONCLUSIONS: FA has the highest sensitivity and specificity in the detection of acute spinal cord abnormalities. Spinal cord fiber tracking is a useful tool to focus measurements on the compressed spinal cord
    corecore