4 research outputs found

    Older adults with colon cancer are not different from younger ones, but treated differently: Retrospective analysis from single centre

    No full text
    Guner Oytun, Merve/0000-0002-7417-5415; Bulut, Gulcan/0000-0001-7382-0972WOS:000634465200001PubMed: 33752476Aim Decision- making of the treatment of colon cancer for the older patients becomes more complicated in consequence of comorbidities and geriatric syndromes, most importantly frailty. in the present study, we aimed to investigate whether there is a difference between tumour characteristics, treatment choices, and outcomes between the younger and older adults. Method The patients who were diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma in our centre between 2010 and 2015 included. Clinicopathological features of tumour, treatment choices and survivals of the patients were recorded. Patients were separated into two groups according to their chronological age. Results The present study included 465 patients, there were 173 patients aged 65 years and older. Clinicopathological features were similar in both groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in similar rates. Whereas combination chemotherapies were preferred in younger patients as first-line therapy, single agents were given to the older group(p-value 0.05). It was observed that 53.2% of the older patients was not treated with any biological treatment (p-value < 0.001). Discussion Geriatric people are underrepresented in clinical trials,because of the presence of the limitations in the older patients. The results of our study revealed older patients with colon cancer patients underwent surgery less than the younger ones, they recieved monotherapy more frequently as first-line chemotherapy, and less frequently targeted therapy. Their mortality was higher. It was shown that decision-making of colon cancer therapy is influenced by age according to our results

    Contribution of complete response to treatment to survival in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective analysis

    No full text
    Background The aim of the study is to reveal the contribution of complete response (CR) to treatment to overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. In addition, to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who attained CR to treatment and to examine the clinicopathologic features of the patient group with CR. Methods This article is a retrospective chart review. Patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer were divided into two groups. The systemic treatment was compared with the patients who received a full response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1) and those who did not attain CR (progression partial response and stable response) in terms of both PFS and OS data, and the effect of attaining CR to treatment on prognosis was evaluated. Results A total of 222 patients were included in the study. 202 of 222 patients could be evaluated in terms of complete response. All data from their files were tabulated and analyzed retrospectively. The mean age of diagnosis of the study group was 60.13 12.52 years. The total number of patients who attained CR to treatment was 31 (15.3%); 171 (84.6%) patients did not attain CR. Patients who had a CR had longer median PFS times than patients who did not have a CR (15.2 vs. 7.4 months, P<0.001). Patients who had CR had longer median survival times than patients who did not have a CR (39.2 vs. 16.9 months, P<0.001). In subgroup patients who underwent primary surgery, the number of patients who attained CR was statistically higher compared with the number of patients who did not attain CR (p<0.001). Complete response was less common in the presence of liver metastasis and bone metastasis (p = 0.041 and p = 0.046, respectively), had a negative prognostic effect. In other words, 89.1% of patients with liver metastasis, 100.0% of patients with bone metastasis, and 88.7% of those who died did not have a CR to the treatment. According to multivariate analysis, CR to treatment, primary surgery, first-line chemotherapy (combination compared with fluoropyrimidine), and no bone metastasis were found to be predictors for OS. Conclusion Providing CR with systemic treatment in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) contributes to prognosis. The primary resection in our secondary acquisitions from the study, the number of metastatic regions and the combination therapy regimens also contributed to the prognosis

    Increase in interventricular septum thickness may be the first sign of cardiovascular change in kidney donors

    No full text
    Sen, Sait/0000-0002-1100-6657; Gokalp, Cenk/0000-0003-3909-7973; Guner Oytun, Merve/0000-0002-7417-5415; DOGDUS, Mustafa/0000-0002-3895-1923WOS: 000507849800001PubMed: 31955456Background Because of the inadequate number of deceased kidney donors, living kidney donation remains an important issue for kidney transplantation. Previous studies have shown that living donation does not differ life expectancy and progression to end-stage renal disease compared with the normal population. in this study, we investigated short-term cardiovascular changes after donor nephrectomy. Methods Thirty-four patients who underwent donor nephrectomy between January 2015 and July 2015 at Ege University Renal Transplantation Unit were included in the study. Arterial stiffness, multifrequency bioimpedance analysis, renal ARFI elastography, and echocardiography performed prior to the donor nephrectomy and 6 months after nephrectomy. Results A total of 34 kidney donors were enrolled in this study. Twenty donors were female (59%) and 14 donors were male (41%). the pathological evaluation of donor kidneys using implantation renal biopsy sample revealed mean Karpinski Renal Score of 1.5 and the mean glomerulosclerosis ratio was 5% for all donated kidneys. Arterial stiffness, systolic and diastolic blood pressure measures, body fluid composition, and left atrial size did not change significantly during the follow-up. However, interventricular septum thickness of donors increased by 1 mm during a 6-month period (9.6 mm vs 10.6 mm, P = .002). Conclusion We observed an increase in interventricular septum thickness in kidney donors during a 6-month follow-up. in order to evaluate the net effect of this change on donor morbidity, prospective studies investigating an increased number of donors with long-term follow-up should be needed
    corecore